Putaminal Volume in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Alzheimer Disease: Differential Volumes in Dementia Subtypes and Controls

References

1. ↵
   1. Looi JCL,
   2. Lindberg O,
   3. Zandbelt BB,
   4. et al

   . Caudate nucleus volumes in frontotemporal lobe dementia: differential atrophy in subtypes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1537– 43

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Schroeter ML,
   2. Razcka K,
   3. Neumann J,
   4. et al

   . Towards a nosology for frontotemporal lobar degenerations: a meta-analysis involving 267 subjects. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 497– 510

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Alexander GE,
   2. DeLong MR,
   3. Strick PL

   . Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 1986; 9: 357– 81

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Hodges JR

   1. Hodges JR,
   2. Patterson K

   . The neuropsychology of frontotemporal dementia. In Hodges JR. Frontotemporal Dementia Syndromes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007: 102– 33
5. ↵
   1. Leh SE,
   2. Ptito A,
   3. Chakravaty MM,
   4. et al

   . Fronto-striatal connections in the human brain: a probabilistic diffusion tractography study. Neurosci Lett 2007; 419: 113– 18

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Postuma RB,
   2. Dagher A

   . Basal ganglia functional connectivity based on a meta-analysis of 126 positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging publications. Cereb Cortex 2007; 16: 1508– 21

   CrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Bumke O

   1. von Braunmühl A,
   2. Picksche K

   . In: Bumke O. Handbuch der Geisteskrankheiten. vol. 11, part VII. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1930: 673– 715
8. ↵
   1. von Bagh K

   . Klinische und pathologisch-anatomische Studien an 30 Fällen systematischer umschriebener Atrophie der Grosshirnrinde (Pickscher Krankheit): Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae—Series A.V. Medica-Anthropologica. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemia; 1946
9. ↵
   1. Lubarsch O,
   2. Rössle F,
   3. Henke F

   1. Lüers T,
   2. Spatz H

   . Picksche Krankheit: Progressive umschriebene Großhirnatrophie. In: Lubarsch O, Rössle F, Henke F. Handbuch der speziellen pathologischen Anatomie und Histologie. vol. 13, part 1A. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1957: 614– 715
10. ↵
    1. Perneczky R,
    2. Diehl-Schmid J,
    3. Förstl H,
    4. et al

    . Urinary incontinence and its functional anatomy in frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 35: 605– 10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Jeong Y,
    2. Cho SS,
    3. Park JM,
    4. et al

    . ¹⁸FDG-PET findings in frontotemporal dementia: an SPM analysis of 29 patients. J Nuc Med 2005; 46: 233– 39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    1. Kim EJ,
    2. Rabinovici GD,
    3. Seeley WW,
    4. et al

    . Patterns of MRI atrophy in tau positive and ubiquitin positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 1375– 78. Epub 2007 Jul 5

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Looi JC,
    2. Lindberg O,
    3. Liberg B,
    4. et al

    . Volumetrics of the caudate nucleus: reliability and validity of a new manual tracing protocol. Psychiatry Res Neuroimag 2008; 163: 279– 88. Epub 2008 Jul 25

    CrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Eritaia J,
    2. Wood SJ,
    3. Stewart GW,
    4. et al

    . An optimized method for estimating intracranial volume from magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 973– 77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000
16. ↵
    World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: 10th Revision Version for 2007. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online. Accessed January 11, 2007
17. ↵
    1. Neary D,
    2. Snowden JS,
    3. Gustafson L,
    4. et al

    . Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998; 51: 1546– 54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Folstein MF,
    2. Folstein SE,
    3. McHugh PR

    . “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 1975; 12: 189– 98

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Woods RP,
    2. Grafton ST,
    3. Holmes CJ,
    4. et al

    . Automated image registration. I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comput Assisted Tomogr 1998; 22: 139– 52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Langen M,
    2. Durston S,
    3. Staal WG,
    4. et al

    . Caudate nucleus is enlarged in high-functioning medication-naïve subjects with autism. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62: 262– 66

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Raz N,
    2. Rodrigue KM,
    3. Kennedy KM,
    4. et al

    . Differential aging of the human striatum: longitudinal evidence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1849– 56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Shrout PE,
    2. Fleiss JL

    . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420– 28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Szabo CA,
    2. Lancaster JL,
    3. Xiong J,
    4. et al

    . MR imaging volumetry of subcortical structures and cerebellar hemispheres in normal persons. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 644– 47

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    1. Gur RE,
    2. Maany V,
    3. Mozley PD,
    4. et al

    . Subcortical MRI volumes in neuroleptic-naive and treated patients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1711– 17

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. DeCarli C,
    2. Hatta J,
    3. Fazilat S,
    4. et al

    . Extratemporal atrophy in patients with complex partial seizures of left temporal origin. Ann Neurol 1998; 43: 41– 45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Murphy DG,
    2. DeCarli C,
    3. Schapiro MB,
    4. et al

    . Age-related differences in volumes of subcortical nuclei, brain matter, and cerebrospinal fluid in healthy men as measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 1992; 49: 839– 45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Krishnamoorthy E

    . A differential role for the hippocampus and amygdala in neuropsychiatric disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 1165

    FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Tekin S,
    2. Cummings JL

    . Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res 2002; 53: 647– 54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Cummings JL

    . Frontal subcortical circuits and human behavior. Arch Neurol 1993; 5: 873– 80
30. ↵
    1. Andrewes DG

    . Neuropsychology: From Theory to Practice. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press; 2001
31. ↵
    1. Feigin VL,
    2. Bennett DA

    1. Barker-Collo S,
    2. McCarthy D

    . Neuropsychological assessment. In: Feigin VL, Bennett DA. Handbook of Clinical Neuroepidemiology. New York: Nova Science; 2007: 621– 48
32. ↵
    1. Parent A,
    2. Hazrati LN

    . Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1995; 20: 91– 127

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Neary D,
    2. Snowden J,
    3. Mann D

    . Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 771– 80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Alexander MP,
    2. Naeser MA,
    3. Palumbo CL

    . Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasia profiles. Brain 1987; 110: 961– 91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Lindberg O,
    2. Östberg P,
    3. Zandbelt BB,
    4. et al

    . Cortical morphometric subclassification of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1233– 39 Epub 2009 Apr 3

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    1. Gottlieb A

    . The Dream of Reason. London, UK: Penguin; 2000: 41