Index by author
Wang, C.-W.
- HEAD & NECKYou have accessEvaluating Instantaneous Perfusion Responses of Parotid Glands to Gustatory Stimulation Using High-Temporal-Resolution Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted ImagingT.-W. Chiu, Y.-J. Liu, H.-C. Chang, Y.-H. Lee, J.-C. Lee, K. Hsu, C.-W. Wang, J.-M. Yang, H.-H. Hsu and C.-J. JuanAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) 1909-1915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4852
Wang, P.-N.
- EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAROpen AccessIntervention versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Cognition in Severe Asymptomatic Carotid StenosisC.-J. Lin, F.-C. Chang, K.-H. Chou, P.-C. Tu, Y.-H. Lee, C.-P. Lin, P.-N. Wang and I.-H. LeeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) 1889-1897; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4798
Wang, Y.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEADULT BRAINOpen AccessMagnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium InjectionY. Zhang, S.A. Gauthier, A. Gupta, L. Tu, J. Comunale, G.C.-Y. Chiang, W. Chen, C.A. Salustri, W. Zhu and Y. WangAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) 1794-1799; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4856
In 54 patients, new T2-weighted lesions were evaluated for enhancement on conventional T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, and their susceptibility values were measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping. Eighty-six of 133 new lesions that were gadolinium-enhancing had relative susceptibility values significantly lower than those of nonenhancing lesions. Using susceptibility values to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing lesions showed a sensitivity of 88.4% and specificity of 91.5%, with a cutoff value of 11.2 parts per billion for QSM.
- ADULT BRAINOpen AccessIn Vivo 7T MR Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Reveals Opposite Susceptibility Contrast between Cortical and White Matter Lesions in Multiple SclerosisW. Bian, E. Tranvinh, T. Tourdias, M. Han, T. Liu, Y. Wang, B. Rutt and M.M. ZeinehAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) 1808-1815; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4830
Weprin, B.
- PEDIATRICSYou have accessMR Imaging of the Cervical Spine in Nonaccidental Trauma: A Tertiary Institution ExperienceR. Jacob, M. Cox, K. Koral, C. Greenwell, Y. Xi, L. Vinson, K. Reeder, B. Weprin, R. Huang and T.N. BoothAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) 1944-1950; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4817
Wong, M.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEHEAD & NECKYou have accessImaging Appearance of SMARCB1 (INI1)-Deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma: A Newly Described Sinonasal MalignancyD.R. Shatzkes, L.E. Ginsberg, M. Wong, A.H. Aiken, B.F. Branstetter, M.A. Michel and N. AygunAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) 1925-1929; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4841
SMARCB1 (INI1) is a tumor-suppressor gene that has been implicated in a growing number of malignancies involving multiple anatomic sites, including the kidneys, soft tissues, and the CNS (See OMIM *601607). The authors describe a case series of 17 patients collected from 6 different centers to give a comprehensive description of the appearance of these tumors on CT, MR, and PET/CT studies. SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis of a central sinonasal mass demonstrating aggressive imaging features, particularly when there is associated calcification.