Index by author
Venkatraghavan, L.
- Adult BrainOpen AccessVascular Dysfunction in LeukoaraiosisK. Sam, A.P. Crawley, J. Poublanc, J. Conklin, O. Sobczyk, D.M. Mandell, J. Duffin, L. Venkatraghavan, J.A. Fisher, S.E. Black and D.J. MikulisAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology December 2016, 37 (12) 2258-2264; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4888
Ventikos, Y.
- InterventionalOpen AccessPorcine In Vivo Validation of a Virtual Contrast Model: The Influence of Contrast Agent Properties and Vessel Flow RatesT.W. Peach, Y. Ventikos, J.V. Byrne and Z. YouAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology December 2016, 37 (12) 2304-2309; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4884
Vitorino, R.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainOpen AccessComparison of Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements Performed by Bookend Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisR.M. D'Ortenzio, S.P. Hojjat, R. Vitorino, C.G. Cantrell, L. Lee, A. Feinstein, P. O'Connor, T.J. Carroll and R.I. AvivAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology December 2016, 37 (12) 2265-2272; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4939
Both dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion with bookend T1-calibration and pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling have been used recently for CBF quantification in relapsing-remitting MS. The authors compared pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling CBF with the bookend technique in a prospective cohort of 19 healthy controls, 19 subjects with relapsing-remitting MS without cognitive impairment, and 20 subjects with relapsing-remitting MS with cognitive impairment. Voxelwise paired t tests revealed no significant CBF differences between techniques after normalization of global meanintensities. They conclude that there is agreement between pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling and bookend technique CBF measurements in healthy controls and patients with relapsing-remitting MS.