Intravenous C-Arm Conebeam CT Angiography following Long-Term Flow-Diverter Implantation: Technologic Evaluation and Preliminary Results

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Miranda C,
   4. Ceratto R, et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–3; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Berentei Z,
   4. Kulcsar Z, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Nelson PK,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. Am J Neuroradiol AJNR 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Fischer S,
   3. Vajda Z,
   4. Aguilar Perez M, et al

   . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiol 2012;54:369–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x pmid:21881914

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. McAuliffe W,
   3. Wycoco V,
   4. Rice H, et al

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2727 pmid:21979492

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Yu SCH,
   3. Kwok CK,
   4. Cheng PW, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Zanaty M,
   3. Chalouhi N,
   4. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

   . Flow-diversion panacea or poison? Front Neurol 2014;5:21 doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00021 pmid:24592254

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Gascou G,
   3. Lobotesis K,
   4. Brunel H, et al

   . Extra-aneurysmal flow modification following Pipeline embolization device implantation: focus on regional branches, perforators, and the parent vessel. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:725–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4191 pmid:25523592

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Saatci I,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Ozer C, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Napoli M,
    4. Leone G, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1683–90 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.029 pmid:24985339

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Curtin KR,
    3. Walker MT,
    4. Shaibani A

    . Appearance of the Neuroform stent on computed tomography angiographic images: imaging pitfall—case illustration. J Neurosurg 2007;107:1249 doi:10.3171/JNS-07/12/1249 pmid:18077969

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Lövblad KO,
    3. Yilmaz H,
    4. Chouiter A, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysm stenting: follow-up with MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:418–22 doi:10.1002/jmri.20642 pmid:16795090

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Saake M,
    4. Ott S, et al

    . Intravenous flat detector CT angiography for non-invasive visualisation of intracranial flow diverter: technical feasibility. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1797–801 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2113-7 pmid:21720943

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Saake M,
    3. Struffert T,
    4. Goelitz P, et al

    . Angiographic CT with intravenous contrast agent application for monitoring of intracranial flow diverting stents. Neuroradiology 2012;54:727–35 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0965-9 pmid:21969242

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Kizilkilic O,
    3. Kocer N,
    4. Metaxas GE, et al

    . Utility of VasoCT in the treatment of intracranial aneurysm with flow-diverter stents. J Neurosurg 2012;117:45–49 doi:10.3171/2012.4.JNS111660 pmid:22559846

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Viera AJ,
    3. Garrett JM

    . Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360–63 pmid:15883903

    PubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Gupta R,
    3. Cheung AC,
    4. Bartling SH, et al

    . Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics 2008;28:2009–22 doi:10.1148/rg.287085004 pmid:19001655

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Miracle AC,
    3. Mukherji SK

    . Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1285–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1654 pmid:19461061

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Bai M,
    3. Liu B,
    4. Mu H, et al

    . The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): a phantom study. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3577–80 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.006 pmid:21963617

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Mettler FA Jr.,
    3. Huda W,
    4. Yoshizumi TT, et al

    . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254–63 doi:10.1148/radiol.2481071451 pmid:18566177

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Yu L,
    3. Vrieze TJ,
    4. Bruesewitz MR, et al

    . Dose and image quality evaluation of a dedicated cone-beam CT system for high-contrast neurologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W193–201 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2951 pmid:20093573

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Engelhorn T,
    3. Struffert T,
    4. Richter G, et al

    . Flat panel detector angiographic CT in the management of aneurysmal rupture during coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1581–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1119 pmid:18499792

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Pfaff J,
    3. Struffert T,
    4. Gölitz P, et al

    . Angiographic CT for intraprocedural monitoring of complex neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E77–80 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3014 pmid:22492566

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Benndorf G,
    3. Strother CM,
    4. Claus B, et al

    . Angiographic CT in cerebrovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1813–18 pmid:16091535

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Patel NV,
    3. Gounis MJ,
    4. Wakhloo AK, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced angiographic cone-beam CT of cerebrovascular stents: experimental optimization and clinical application. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:137–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2239 pmid:20966059

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Flood TF,
    3. van der Bom IM,
    4. Strittmatter L, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced, cone-beam CT for the detection of intracranial in-stent hyperplasia. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:118–25 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010950 pmid:24480728

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. van der Marel K,
    3. Gounis M,
    4. King R, et al

    . P-001 high-resolution optical and angiographic CT imaging of flow-diverter stents for assessment of vessel wall apposition. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6(suppl 1):A21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011343.37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Psychogios MN,
    3. Scholz B,
    4. Rohkohl C, et al

    . Impact of a new metal artefact reduction algorithm in the noninvasive follow-up of intracranial clips, coils, and stents with flat-panel angiographic CTA: initial results. Neuroradiology 2013;55:813–18 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1165-6 pmid:23588613

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. van der Bom IM,
    3. Hou SY,
    4. Puri AS, et al

    . Reduction of coil mass artifacts in high-resolution flat detector conebeam CT of cerebral stent-assisted coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2163–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3561 pmid:23721899

    Abstract/FREE Full Text