Index by author
Baal, J.D.
- Adult BrainOpen AccessPreoperative MR Imaging to Differentiate Chordoid Meningiomas from Other Meningioma Histologic SubtypesJ.D. Baal, W.C. Chen, D.A. Solomon, J.S. Pai, C.-H. Lucas, J.H. Hara, N.A. Oberheim Bush, M.W. McDermott, D.R. Raleigh and J.E. Villanueva-MeyerAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 433-439; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5996
Barbe, C.
- InterventionalOpen AccessAneurysm Characteristics, Study Population, and Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large, Prospective, Multicenter Cohort: Results of the Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm StudyM. Gawlitza, S. Soize, C. Barbe, A. le Clainche, P. White, L. Spelle and L. Pierot ARETA Study GroupAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 517-523; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5991
Batchala, P.P.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBAdult BrainYou have accessNeuroimaging-Based Classification Algorithm for Predicting 1p/19q-Codeletion Status in IDH-Mutant Lower Grade GliomasP.P. Batchala, T.J.E. Muttikkal, J.H. Donahue, J.T. Patrie, D. Schiff, C.E. Fadul, E.K. Mrachek, M.-B. Lopes, R. Jain and S.H. PatelAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 426-432; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5957
One hundred two IDH-mutant lower grade gliomas with preoperative MR imaging and known 1p/19q status from The Cancer Genome Atlas composed a training dataset. Two neuroradiologists in consensus analyzed the training dataset for various imaging features: tumor or cyst texture, margins, cortical infiltration, T2-FLAIR mismatch, tumor cyst, T2* susceptibility, hydrocephalus, midline shift, maximum dimension, primary lobe, necrosis, enhancement, edema, and gliomatosis. Statistical analysis of the training data produced a multivariate classification model for codeletion prediction based on a subset of MR imaging features and patient age. Training dataset analysis produced a 2-step classification algorithm with 86.3% codeletion prediction accuracy, based on the following: 1) the presence of the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign, which was 100% predictive of noncodeleted lowergrade gliomas; and 2)a logistic regression model based on texture, patient age, T2* susceptibility, primary lobe, and hydrocephalus. Independent validation ofthe classification algorithm rendered codeletion prediction accuracies of 81.1% and 79.2% in 2 independent readers.
Bathla, G.
- LETTERYou have accessEngorged Medullary Veins in Neurosarcoidosis: A Reflection of Underlying Phlebitis?G. Bathla, N. Soni, T. Moritani and A.A. CapizzanoAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) E14-E15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5951
Baxter, B.W.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEYou have accessImaging of Patients with Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion at Primary Stroke Centers: Available Modalities and a Suggested ApproachM.A. Almekhlafi, W.G. Kunz, B.K. Menon, R.A. McTaggart, M.V. Jayaraman, B.W. Baxter, D. Heck, D. Frei, C.P. Derdeyn, T. Takagi, A.H. Aamodt, I.M.R. Fragata, M.D. Hill, A.M. Demchuk and M. GoyalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 396-400; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5971
Endovascular thrombectomy has proven efficacy for a wide range of patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke and in selected cases up to 24 hours from onset. While primary stroke centers have increased the proportion of patients withstroke receiving thrombolytic therapy, delays can be encountereduntil patients with LVO are identified and transferred from the primary stroke center to acomprehensive stroke center. Therefore, any extra steps need to be carefullyweighed. The use of CTA (especially multiphase) at the primary stroke center levelhas many advantages in expediting the transfer of appropriate patients to a comprehensive center.
Baxter, L.C.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBAdult BrainOpen AccessAccurate Patient-Specific Machine Learning Models of Glioblastoma Invasion Using Transfer LearningL.S. Hu, H. Yoon, J.M. Eschbacher, L.C. Baxter, A.C. Dueck, A. Nespodzany, K.A. Smith, P. Nakaji, Y. Xu, L. Wang, J.P. Karis, A.J. Hawkins-Daarud, K.W. Singleton, P.R. Jackson, B.J. Anderies, B.R. Bendok, R.S. Zimmerman, C. Quarles, A.B. Porter-Umphrey, M.M. Mrugala, A. Sharma, J.M. Hoxworth, M.G. Sattur, N. Sanai, P.E. Koulemberis, C. Krishna, J.R. Mitchell, T. Wu, N.L. Tran, K.R. Swanson and J. LiAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 418-425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5981
The authors evaluated tumor cell density using a transfer learning method that generates individualized patient models, grounded in the wealth of population data, while also detecting and adjusting for interpatient variabilities based on each patient's own histologic data. They collected 82 image-recorded biopsy samples, from 18 patients with primary GBM. With multivariate modeling, transfer learning improved performance (r = 0.88) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.39). They conclude that transfer learning significantly improves predictive modeling performance for quantifying tumor cell density in glioblastoma.
Baylosis, B.
- Head & NeckYou have accessEtiology-Specific Mineralization Patterns in Patients with Labyrinthitis OssificansK. Buch, B. Baylosis, A. Fujita, M.M. Qureshi, K. Takumi, P.C. Weber and O. SakaiAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 551-557; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5985
Beaujeux, R.
- InterventionalYou have accessPredictors and Clinical Impact of Delayed Stent Thrombosis after Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke with Tandem LesionsR. Pop, I. Zinchenko, V. Quenardelle, D. Mihoc, M. Manisor, J.S. Richter, F. Severac, M. Simu, S. Chibbaro, O. Rouyer, V. Wolff and R. BeaujeuxAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 533-539; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5976
Becske, T.
- CommentaryYou have accessPipeline Sizing Based on Computer SimulationT. BecskeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 531-532; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5998
Bendok, B.R.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBAdult BrainOpen AccessAccurate Patient-Specific Machine Learning Models of Glioblastoma Invasion Using Transfer LearningL.S. Hu, H. Yoon, J.M. Eschbacher, L.C. Baxter, A.C. Dueck, A. Nespodzany, K.A. Smith, P. Nakaji, Y. Xu, L. Wang, J.P. Karis, A.J. Hawkins-Daarud, K.W. Singleton, P.R. Jackson, B.J. Anderies, B.R. Bendok, R.S. Zimmerman, C. Quarles, A.B. Porter-Umphrey, M.M. Mrugala, A. Sharma, J.M. Hoxworth, M.G. Sattur, N. Sanai, P.E. Koulemberis, C. Krishna, J.R. Mitchell, T. Wu, N.L. Tran, K.R. Swanson and J. LiAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology March 2019, 40 (3) 418-425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5981
The authors evaluated tumor cell density using a transfer learning method that generates individualized patient models, grounded in the wealth of population data, while also detecting and adjusting for interpatient variabilities based on each patient's own histologic data. They collected 82 image-recorded biopsy samples, from 18 patients with primary GBM. With multivariate modeling, transfer learning improved performance (r = 0.88) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.39). They conclude that transfer learning significantly improves predictive modeling performance for quantifying tumor cell density in glioblastoma.