Index by author
Saha, I.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainYou have accessSpiral T1 Spin-Echo for Routine Postcontrast Brain MRI Exams: A Multicenter Multireader Clinical EvaluationM.B. Ooi, Z. Li, R.K. Robison, D. Wang, A.G. Anderson, N.R. Zwart, A. Bakhru, S. Nagaraj, T. Mathews, S. Hey, J.J. Koonen, I.E. Dimitrov, H.T. Friel, Q. Lu, M. Obara, I. Saha, H. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, M. Temkit, H.H. Hu, T.L. Chenevert, O. Togao, J.A. Tkach, U.D. Nagaraj, M.C. Pinho, R.K. Gupta, J.E. Small, M.M. Kunst, J.P. Karis, J.B. Andre, J.H. Miller, N.K. Pinter and J.G. PipeAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 238-245; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6409
The authors report a multicenter multireader study that was designed to compare spiral with standard-of-care Cartesian postcontrast structural brain MR imaging on the basis of relative performance in 10 metrics of image quality, artifact prevalence, and diagnostic benefit. Seven clinical sites acquired 88 total subjects. For each subject, sites acquired 2 postcontrast MR imaging scans: a spiral 2D T1 spin-echo, and 1 of 4 routine Cartesian 2D T1 spin-echo/TSE scans. Nine neuroradiologists independently reviewed each subject, with the matching pair of spiral and Cartesian scans compared side-by-side, and scored the subject on 10 image-quality metrics. Spiral was superior to Cartesian in 7 of 10 metrics (flow artifact mitigation, SNR, GM/WM contrast, image sharpness, lesion conspicuity, preference for diagnosing abnormal enhancement, and overall intracranial image quality), comparable in 1 of 10 metrics (motion artifacts), and inferior in 2 of 10 metrics (susceptibility artifacts, overall extracranial image quality). Spiral 2D T1 spin-echo for routine structural brain MR imaging is feasible in the clinic with conventional scanners and was preferred by neuroradiologists for overall postcontrast intracranial evaluation.
Sakabe, D.
- Adult BrainYou have accessMetal Artifact Reduction in Head CT Performed for Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: Effectiveness of a Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction AlgorithmY. Nagayama, S. Tanoue, S. Oda, D. Sakabe, T. Emoto, M. Kidoh, H. Uetani, A. Sasao, T. Nakaura, O. Ikeda, K. Yamada and Y. YamashitaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 231-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6375
Saposnik, G.
- NeurointerventionYou have accessEndovascular Treatment Decisions in Patients with M2 Segment MCA OcclusionsM. Almekhlafi, J.M. Ospel, G. Saposnik, N. Kashani, A. Demchuk, M.D. Hill, M. Goyal and B.K. MenonAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 280-285; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6397
- NeurointerventionYou have accessHow Do Physicians Approach Intravenous Alteplase Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Who Are Eligible for Intravenous Alteplase and Endovascular Therapy? Insights from UNMASK-EVTJ.M. Ospel, N. Kashani, U. Fischer, B.K. Menon, M. Almekhlafi, A.T. Wilson, M.M. Foss, G. Saposnik, M. Goyal and M.D. HillAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 262-267; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6396
Sasao, A.
- Adult BrainYou have accessMetal Artifact Reduction in Head CT Performed for Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices: Effectiveness of a Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction AlgorithmY. Nagayama, S. Tanoue, S. Oda, D. Sakabe, T. Emoto, M. Kidoh, H. Uetani, A. Sasao, T. Nakaura, O. Ikeda, K. Yamada and Y. YamashitaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 231-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6375
Scheel, M.
- Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided InterventionsOpen AccessConsiderations for Mean Upper Cervical Cord Area Implementation in a Longitudinal MRI Setting: Methods, Interrater Reliability, and MRI Quality ControlC. Chien, V. Juenger, M. Scheel, A.U. Brandt and F. PaulAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 343-350; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6394
Schubert, G.A.
- EDITOR'S CHOICESpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided InterventionsYou have accessLong-Term Outcome of Patients with Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: The Dilemma of Delayed DiagnosisF. Jablawi, G.A. Schubert, M. Dafotakis, J. Pons-Kühnemann, F.-J. Hans and M. MullAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 357-363; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6372
Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (sdAVFs) usually become symptomatic in elderly men, who are affected 5 times more often than women. Symptoms caused by sdAVF comprise gait disturbances with or without paresis, sensory disturbances in the lower extremities, pain, and sphincter and erectile dysfunction. The authors retrospectively analyzed their medical data base for all patients treated for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula at their institution between 2006 and 2016. Patient age, neurologic status at the time of diagnosis, the duration of symptoms from onset to diagnosis, and follow-up information were evaluated. The extent of medullary T2WI hyperintensity, intramedullary contrast enhancement, and elongation of perimedullary veins on MR imaging at the time of diagnosis were additionally analyzed. Data for long-term outcome analysis were available in 40 patients with a mean follow-up of 52 months. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69 years (median, 71 years; range, 53-84 years) with a male predominance (80%). The mean duration of symptoms was 20 months. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are characterized by inter-individually variable clinical presentations, which make a determination of specific predictors for long-term outcome more difficult. Fast and sufficient diagnosis might result in a better outcome after treatment. The diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula remains markedly delayed, reflecting an ongoing lack of knowledge and awareness among treating physicians of this rare-but-serious disease.
Scoggins, M.
- Pediatric NeuroimagingYou have accessMRI Patterns of Extrapontine Lesion Extension in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine GliomasL. Makepeace, M. Scoggins, B. Mitrea, Y. Li, A. Edwards, C.L. Tinkle, S. Hwang, A. Gajjar and Z. PatayAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 323-330; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6391
Senko, J.L.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainYou have accessAssessment of a Bayesian Vitrea CT Perfusion Analysis to Predict Final Infarct and Penumbra Volumes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison with RAPIDR.A. Rava, K.V. Snyder, M. Mokin, M. Waqas, A.B. Allman, J.L. Senko, A.R. Podgorsak, M.M. Shiraz Bhurwani, Y. Hoi, A.H. Siddiqui, J.M. Davies, E.I. Levy and C.N. IonitaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 206-212; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6395
Data were retrospectively collected for 105 patients with acute ischemic stroke (55 patients with successful recanalization [TICI 2b/2c/3] and large-vessel occlusions and 50 patients without interventions). Final infarct volumes were calculated using DWI and FLAIR 24 hours following CTP imaging. RAPID and the Vitrea Bayesian CTP algorithm (with 3 different settings) predicted infarct and penumbra volumes for comparison with final infarct volumes to assess software performance. RAPID and Vitrea default setting had the most accurate final infarct volume prediction in patients with interventions. Default Vitrea and RAPID were the most and least accurate in determining final infarct volume for patients without an intervention, respectively. Compared with RAPID, the Vitrea default setting was noninferior for patients with interventions and superior in penumbra estimation for patients without interventions as indicated by mean infarct differences and correlations with final infarct volumes.
Sharma, A.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided InterventionsYou have accessRenal Excretion of Contrast on CT Myelography: A Specific Marker of CSF LeakS. Behbahani, J. Raseman, H. Orlowski, A. Sharma and R. EldayaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 351-356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6393
The authors performed a retrospective review of postmyelographic CT scans from 49 consecutive patients seen between January 2009 and August 2018 with imaging and/or clinical findings related to intracranial hypotension. Each scan was evaluated by both a neuroradiology fellow and a board-certified neuroradiologist for the presence of contrast in the renal excretory system. A similar assessment was also performed on 90 consecutive control subjects who underwent CT myelography for alternative indications. Among the 49 patients with suspected CSF leak, 21 (43%) had an overt CSF leak on postmyelographic CT (group 1) and 28 (57%) did not (group 2). Overall, renal contrast was identified in 7/49 patients (14.3%): 5 (24%) patients in group 1, and 2 (7%) patients in group 2. Renal contrast was not seen in any of the 90 controls on postmyelographic CT. Renal contrast was exclusively seen in patients with a clinically or radiographically suspected CSF leak. Identification of this finding should prompt a second look for subtle myelographic contrast extravasation or an underlying CSF-venous fistula.
Shiraz Bhurwani, M.M.
- EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult BrainYou have accessAssessment of a Bayesian Vitrea CT Perfusion Analysis to Predict Final Infarct and Penumbra Volumes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison with RAPIDR.A. Rava, K.V. Snyder, M. Mokin, M. Waqas, A.B. Allman, J.L. Senko, A.R. Podgorsak, M.M. Shiraz Bhurwani, Y. Hoi, A.H. Siddiqui, J.M. Davies, E.I. Levy and C.N. IonitaAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 206-212; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6395
Data were retrospectively collected for 105 patients with acute ischemic stroke (55 patients with successful recanalization [TICI 2b/2c/3] and large-vessel occlusions and 50 patients without interventions). Final infarct volumes were calculated using DWI and FLAIR 24 hours following CTP imaging. RAPID and the Vitrea Bayesian CTP algorithm (with 3 different settings) predicted infarct and penumbra volumes for comparison with final infarct volumes to assess software performance. RAPID and Vitrea default setting had the most accurate final infarct volume prediction in patients with interventions. Default Vitrea and RAPID were the most and least accurate in determining final infarct volume for patients without an intervention, respectively. Compared with RAPID, the Vitrea default setting was noninferior for patients with interventions and superior in penumbra estimation for patients without interventions as indicated by mean infarct differences and correlations with final infarct volumes.