Transradial Approach for Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Single-Center Review of Safety and Feasibility

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Archbold RA,
   2. Robinson NM,
   3. Schilling RJ

   . Radial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. BMJ 2004;329:443–46 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7463.443 pmid:15321904

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Caputo RP,
   2. Tremmel JA,
   3. Rao S, et al

   . Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:823–39 doi:10.1002/ccd.23052 pmid:21544927

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Hamon M,
   2. Pristipino C,
   3. Di Mario C, et al

   ; Working Group on Thrombosis on the European Society of Cardiology. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 2013;8:1242–51 doi:10.4244/EIJV8I11A192 pmid:23354100

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Mann JT 3rd.,
   2. Cubeddu MG,
   3. Schneider JE, et al

   . Right radial access for PTCA: a prospective study demonstrates reduced complications and hospital charges. J Invasive Cardiol 1996;8 (Suppl D):40d–44 pmid:10785786

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Mason PJ,
   2. Shah B,
   3. Tamis-Holland JE, et al

   ; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e000035 doi:10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035 pmid:30354598

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Mitchell MD,
   2. Hong JA,
   3. Lee BY, et al

   . Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:454–62 doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965269 pmid:22740010

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Bernat I,
   2. Horak D,
   3. Stasek J, et al

   . ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:964–72 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1651 pmid:24211309

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Jolly SS,
   2. Yusuf S,
   3. Cairns J, et al

   . Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409–20 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2 pmid:21470671

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Mehta SR,
   2. Jolly SS,
   3. Cairns J, et al

   ; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2490–99 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050 pmid:23103036

   FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Romagnoli E,
    2. Biondi-Zoccai G,
    3. Sciahbasi A, et al

    . Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2481–89 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017 pmid:22858390

    FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Valgimigli M,
    2. Gagnor A,
    3. Calabró P, et al

    ; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2015;385:2465–76 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6 pmid:25791214

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Posham R,
    2. Biederman DM,
    3. Patel RS, et al

    . Transradial approach for noncoronary interventions: a single-center review of safety and feasibility in the first 1,500 cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;27:159–66 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.026 pmid:26706186

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kumar AJ,
    2. Jones LE,
    3. Kollmeyer KR, et al

    . Radial artery access for peripheral endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 2017;66:820–25 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.430 pmid:28571881

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ruzsa Z,
    2. Nemes B,
    3. Pinter L, et al

    . A randomised comparison of transradial and transfemoral approach for carotid artery stenting: RADCAR (RADial access for CARotid artery stenting) study. EuroIntervention 2014;10:381–91 doi:10.4244/EIJV10I3A64 pmid:25042266

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Zussman BM,
    2. Tonetti DA,
    3. Stone J, et al

    . A prospective study of the transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral arteriography. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1045–49 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014686 pmid:30842303

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Matsumoto Y,
    2. Hokama M,
    3. Nagashima H, et al

    . Transradial approach for selective cerebral angiography: technical note. Neurol Res 2000;22:605–08 doi:10.1080/01616412.2000.11740727 pmid:11045024

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Matsumoto Y,
    2. Hongo K,
    3. Toriyama T, et al

    . Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography: results of a consecutive series of 166 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:704–08 pmid:11290482

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Jo KW,
    2. Park SM,
    3. Kim SD, et al

    . Is transradial cerebral angiography feasible and safe? A single center’s experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010;47:332–37 doi:10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.332 pmid:20539791

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Levy EI,
    2. Boulos AS,
    3. Fessler RD, et al

    . Transradial cerebral angiography: an alternative route. Neurosurgery 2002;51:335–42 pmid:12182771

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Park JH,
    2. Kim DY,
    3. Kim JW, et al

    . Efficacy of transradial cerebral angiography in the elderly. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013;53:213–17 doi:10.3340/jkns.2013.53.4.213 pmid:23826476

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Snelling BM,
    2. Sur S,
    3. Shah SS, et al

    . Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:874–81 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013584 pmid:29311120

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Barbeau GR,
    2. Arsenault F,
    3. Dugas L, et al

    . Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen’s test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 2004;147:489–93 doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.038 pmid:14999199

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Starke RM,
    2. Snelling B,
    3. Al-Mufti F, et al

    . Transarterial and transvenous access for neurointerventional surgery: report of the SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:733–41 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015573 pmid:31818970

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Rashid M,
    2. Kwok CS,
    3. Pancholy S, et al

    . Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002686 doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002686] pmid:26811162

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Chen SH,
    2. Brunet MC,
    3. Sur S, et al

    . Feasibility of repeat transradial access for neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:431–34 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015438 pmid:31586940

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Khanna O,
    2. Sweid A,
    3. Mouchtouris N, et al

    . Radial artery catheterization for neuroendovascular procedures. Stroke 2019;50:2587–90 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025811 pmid:31311466

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Hess CN,
    2. Peterson ED,
    3. Neely ML, et al

    . The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2014;129:2277–86 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006356 pmid:24756064

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Sur S,
    2. Snelling B,
    3. Khandelwal P, et al

    . P-005 adoption of the transradial approach for cerebral angiography: learning curve and early experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:A24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-SNIS.42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Carvalho MS,
    2. Calé R,
    3. de Araújo Gonçalves P, et al

    . Predictors of conversion from radial into femoral access in cardiac catheterization [in Portuguese]. Arq Bras Cardiol 2015;104:401–08 doi:10.5935/abc.20150017 pmid:25789883

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Titano JJ,
    2. Biederman DM,
    3. Zech J, et al

    . Safety and outcomes of transradial access in patients with international normalized ratio 1.5 or above. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018;29:383–88 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2017.11.010 pmid:29395902

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Brunet M-C,
    2. Chen SH,
    3. Peterson EC

    . Transradial access for neurointerventions: management of access challenges and complications. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:82–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015145 pmid:31350370

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Levin SR,
    2. Farber A,
    3. Bertges DJ, et al

    . Larger sheath size for infrainguinal endovascular intervention is associated with minor but not major morbidity or mortality. Ann Vasc Surg 2019;60:327–34 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.003 pmid:31200055

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Chung R,
    2. Weller A,
    3. Morgan R, et al

    . Are complication rates lower with 4-Fr versus 6-Fr transfemoral arterial access: prospective audit at a single interventional radiology centre. CVIR Endovasc 2018;1:15 doi:10.1186/s42155-018-0022-4 pmid:30652147

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Uhlemann M,
    2. Möbius-Winkler S,
    3. Mende M, et al

    . The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:36–43 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.011 pmid:22230148

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Stone JG,
    2. Zussman BM,
    3. Tonetti DA, et al

    . Transradial versus transfemoral approaches for diagnostic cerebral angiography: a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority comparative effectiveness study. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:993–98 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015642 pmid:31974282

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Chen SH,
    2. Snelling BM,
    3. Sur S, et al

    . Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:874–78 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014485 pmid:30670623

    Abstract/FREE Full Text