Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Assessment of Brain Abscesses Therapy

Fabiola W. Cartes-Zumelzu, Ioannis Stavrou, Mauricio Castillo, Edith Eisenhuber, Engelbert Knosp and Majda M. Thurnher
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2004, 25 (8) 1310-1317;
Fabiola W. Cartes-Zumelzu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ioannis Stavrou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mauricio Castillo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edith Eisenhuber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Engelbert Knosp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Majda M. Thurnher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgically or conservatively treated brain abscesses may resolve, or pus may re-accumulate, requiring further intervention or treatment change. We hypothesized that diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging is useful in depicting features of abscesses related to therapeutic success or failure.

METHODS: Conventional contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted imaging and DW imaging were performed in seven patients (aged 30–69 years) with proved pyogenic brain abscesses. The center of the abscess was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed at initial and follow-up imaging in all patients. We correlated the signal intensity on trace DW images and the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) with the clinical and laboratory data, particularly with respect to treatment failure and repeat therapy.

RESULTS: Surgical drainage was performed in six patients; one patient was treated with only antibiotics. All abscess cavities initially had high signal intensity (restricted diffusion) on DW images, with a mean ADC value of 0.52 × 10 −3mm 2/s. Low signal intensity at DW imaging with high ADC were seen on follow-up images in the patient receiving medication and in four patients in whom the abscesses were drained; this correlated with a good therapeutic response. Two patients underwent drainage; their second follow-up DW images showed areas of high signal intensity and low ADC values suggesting re-accumulation of pus. Increased C-reactive protein level and WBC count correlated well with DW image findings.

CONCLUSION: DW imaging was superior to conventional MR imaging in evaluating the success or failure of abscess therapy. Restricted diffusion in a drained abscess corresponded to pus.

The typical appearance of a brain abscess at conventional MR imaging is that of a ring-enhancing lesion, with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and low or intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images. A mature abscess has a low-signal-intensity capsule on T2-weighted images (1).

However, the presence of a ring-enhancing lesion in the brain is not diagnostic of abscess and must be distinguished from a necrotic neoplasm and other cystic lesions. Data from recent studies suggest that diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging is more sensitive than conventional MR imaging in distinguishing brain abscesses and cystic tumors (2–8). Pus in brain abscesses is strongly hyperintense on trace DW images and has a reduced apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). On the contrary, most necrotic or cystic brain tumors have intermediate signal intensity on DW images and elevated ADC values (2–10).

The management of brain abscesses varies. CT-guided stereotactic aspiration followed by intravenous antibiotic therapy is the favored treatment for solitary and multiple brain abscesses, but other abscesses may be treated with only antibiotics. Because treatment failure has considerable prognostic implications, early detection of pus re-accumulation is desirable. Unfortunately, laboratory parameters that measure inflammatory responses may lag behind actual relapse of the abscess.

We hypothesized that DW imaging is useful in the post-treatment follow-up of abscesses, as it depicts imaging features related to the success or failure of therapy.

Methods

Subjects

Seven patients with brain abscesses were prospectively enrolled in this study. The four men and three women had a mean age of 42.8 years (range, 30–69 years). Clinical signs, symptoms, and results of their laboratory tests are summarized in Table 1.. In six patients, stereotactic surgical drainage of the abscess cavities was performed, followed by intravenous antibiotics. Two of these patients underwent two surgical interventions. In one patient, the brain abscess was treated with antibiotics only.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory results

MR Imaging Examinations

Brain MR imaging was performed by using clinical 1.5-T systems in two institutions. The following were performed in all patients: 2-mm coronal T2-weighted sequence (TR/TE/NEX,4000/90/1), 4-mm axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence (FLAIR; TR/TE/TI, 11000/80/2800), and axial 1.25-mm gradient-echo T1-weighted sequence (20/1.76/1; flip angle, 35 ο) before and after gadolinium administration.

A single-shot, multisection, spin-echo echo-planar pulse sequence (TR/TE, 4116/89) was used for DW imaging. We collected DW images in three directions (x, y, and z) with b values of 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm 2, a field of view of 230 mm, a matrix of 128 × 128 or 256 × 256, and an acquisition time of 34 seconds. ADC maps were generated from the DW image datasets. First, we qualitatively evaluated the signal intensity from the abscess cavity on the trace DW image and then, round regions of interest were drawn manually; these were placed entirely within the abscess cavities and also in normal-appearing brain regions contralateral to the abscesses. ADC values were recorded from the baseline pretherapeutic studies and on all follow-up studies obtained during treatment. ADC ratios were calculated as the ratio of the mean ADC in the lesion to the mean ADC in normal white matter. On all follow-up MR imaging studies, we also qualitatively evaluated the appearance of the lesions (ie, signal intensity, size, pattern of enhancement, degree of surrounding edema) for any finding that suggested treatment failure (as evidenced by an increase in any of these parameters).

Clinical Examinations

All patients underwent neurologic and laboratory examinations for baseline values and during therapy on a daily and biweekly basis during 4-week intravenous antibiotic treatments. Afterward, patients received oral antibiotics for 4 weeks and were monitored weekly on an outpatient basis for indications of treatment failure.

Results

MR Imaging Findings

Five patients had one lesion, and two patients had multiple lesions. The mean diameter of the abscesses was 2.87 cm (range, 1.1–4.0 cm). Table 1 lists their locations. On T2-weighted images, all lesions showed central high signal intensity with capsules of low signal intensity. T1-weighted images showed central low-to-intermediate signal intensity in all lesions. On FLAIR images, the abscesses were isointense relative to gray matter. Perilesional edema and mass effect were always present. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed ring enhancement in all lesions consistent with mature cerebral abscesses. All follow-up images were obtained on a weekly basis. One patient underwent six follow-up imaging studies; one, five; one, four; and three, three. In four patients, follow-up MR images showed that the central signal intensity of the abscesses did not change with any sequence. The degree of mass effect, surrounding edema, and contrast enhancement decreased slightly but did not change substantially compared with the respective features on pretreatment studies. In three of these patients, therapy was successful; in one, therapy failed. In another patient, the abscesses mildly increased in size; this change corresponded to the clinical failure of treatment.

DW Findings

Table 2 summarizes the signal intensities of the lesions on DW images and the measured ADC values on initial and subsequent MR images in the six patients who underwent surgical drainage.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

Signal intensities on DWI and ADC values

On initial DW imaging studies, all brain abscesses showed central high signal intensity, and low ADC values (mean, 0.52 × 10 −3 mm 2/s; range, 0.36–0.75 × 10 −3mm 2/s) indicating restricted diffusion. In patients 1, 6, and 7, who underwent surgical intervention, first follow-up trace DW images showed low signal intensity, and mean ADC values increased (from 0.47 × 10 −3 to 1.15 × 10 −3 mm 2/s). Subsequent follow-up demonstrated further increase in ADC and low signal intensity on DW images (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Patient 1. A 40-year-old man with mild ataxia and homonymous hemianopia. CRP level was initially 0.5 mg/dL and did not change in the clinical course. WBC count was mildly increased initially and decreased soon after surgical drainage. DW images were well correlated with conventional MR images, showing no re-accumulation of pus.

A, Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image shows a ring-enhancing lesion in the left occipital region, with perifocal edema.

B and C, Trace DW images show a hyperintense lesion and a low ADC indicating restricted diffusion. Clinical and imaging findings were consistent with brain abscess.

D–F, Four days after surgical drainage, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image (D) shows that the lesion is diminished, with predominantly low signal intensity on a DW image (E) and a high ADC on ADC map (F); these finding suggest clear fluid in the abscess cavity.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Patient 1. Additional images.

A–C, Follow-up images obtained 9 days later (2 weeks after drainage) show further decrease in the size of the abscess (A), persistence of low signal intensity on DW imaging (B), and a high ADC (C).

D-F, Last DW images (E) (1 month after drainage) show no enhancement and no abnormality.

Patient 3 had two lesions, one that was surgically drained and showed low signal intensity on trace images and increased ADC (from 0.53 × 10 −3 to 0.81 × 10 −3 mm 2/s) at first follow-up. The second lesion was not aspirated and showed increased ADC (from 0.81 × 10 −3 to 2.76 × 10 −3 mm 2/s) at first follow-up. At second follow-up, the abscess that was not drained increased in size and showed a decrease in ADC value (from 1.12 × 10 −3 to 0.46 × 10 −3 mm 2/s); this finding suggested the persistence of purulent fluid and an insufficient therapeutic response to antibiotics. This abscess was not drained, but the antibiotics were changed.

In patients 2 and 5, first follow-up images obtained after drainage showed decreased mean ADC in the abscess cavity (from 0.5 × 10 −3 to 2.75 × 10 −3 mm 2/s). At second follow-up in patient 2 (13 days after surgical drainage), trace DW images showed increased signal intensity, and ADC decrease (from 2.56 × 10 −3to 1.16 × 10 −3 mm 2/s) was documented (Figs 3 and 4). Surgical drainage was repeated; the findings confirmed the presence of pus. Subsequent images (7 days after the second intervention) showed persistence of high signal intensity on trace DW images and a further decrease in ADC value (0.76 × 10 −3 mm 2/s). After a change in antibiotics, a follow-up image obtained 11 days after second drainage showed an increase in ADC (1.17 × 10 −3 mm 2/s) and low signal intensity on trace DW images, suggesting improvement. In patient 5, third follow-up studies showed high signal intensity on DW images and decreased ADC, suggesting relapse of purulent fluid. After repeat intervention, follow-up MR study showed low signal intensity on DW images and an increase in ADC value.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Patient 2. A 31-year-old man with fever, seizures, and weakness of the left upper extremity. DW images were superior to conventional MR images showing re-accumulation of pus and well correlated with increased CRP levels and WBC counts.

A–C, Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted shows a peripheral enhancing lesion with a hypointense center in the right parietal region. Hyperintensity at DW imaging (B) and a low ADC (C) suggest abscess formation with restricted diffusion due to pus.

D–F, One day after surgery, images show decreased size of the abscess (D), hypointensity at DW imaging (E), and a high ADC of 2.56 × 10 −3mm 2/s (F).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Patient 2. Additional MR images.

A–C, Follow-up image (A) obtained 15 days after surgical intervention shows reduced size of the abscess cavity. Corresponding DW image (B) shows hyperintensity in the abscess cavity with a decreased ADC to 0.76 × 10 −3mm 2/s (C), indicating reappearance of pus. Second drainage was performed 1 day later.

D–F, Forty days after second intervention, follow-up images show resolution of the abscess cavity, with residual hypointensity on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image and no abnormality on DW images.

In patient 4, who was treated with antibiotics only, the first and all subsequent trace DW images demonstrated low signal intensity, with a corresponding increase in ADC. These findings suggested no pus and, therefore, a good therapeutic response.

Clinical Findings

Six patients initially underwent surgical drainage of the abscesses. One procedure was done via open craniotomy, and five, with stereotactic guidance. After the pus was drained, all cavities were washed with artificial CSF solution containing vancomycin. In three patients, pathogens were established (S intermedius, S aureus, Nocardia species, and P nigros). In three other patients, cultures grew no organisms. In the patient who did not undergo surgical drainage, findings of multiple blood cultures were negative, and the abscess was conservatively treated on an empirical basis. All patients received combination intravenous antibiotics for 4 weeks followed by oral antibiotics for 4 weeks. Patients 2 and 5 underwent second surgical interventions. In both patients, CRP levels increased, and their clinical symptoms worsened. DW images showed high signal intensity in the abscess cavity, with decreased ADC in both cases. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed decreased size of the abscesses, with an enhancing capsule. A second aspiration was done on the basis of the DW imaging, clinical, and laboratory findings; pus was recovered from both abscesses.

Discussion

A ring-enhancing lesion in the brain is a nonspecific finding, and a variety of inflammatory and neoplastic processes can have a similar appearance. Moreover, it is important to differentiate between a pyogenic brain abscess and a necrotic neoplasm, as both have different treatments and prognoses.

Several studies have addressed the utility of DW imaging in distinguishing cerebral abscesses from necrotic tumors (2–10). DW imaging is based on the microscopic motion of water molecules and depends mostly on the water located in the extracellular space (11). To quantify the degree of water motion, ADC maps are needed (11). Necrotic material in cerebral abscesses contains inflammatory cells, a matrix of proteins, cellular debris, and bacteria in high-viscosity pus; all of these factors restrict water motion. Additionally, water molecules are bound to amino acid groups on the surface of macromolecules, further restricting their motion. Therefore, restricted water motion in cerebral abscesses has increased signal intensity on trace DW imaging and low ADC values. Conversely, necrotic material in tumors contains cellular debris, serous fluid, and fewer inflammatory cells; thus, water molecules have a greater freedom of motion (12). Most necrotic tumors show mildly increased diffusion with low-to-intermediate signal intensity on trace DW images and high ADC values. In one in vitro study, DW imaging of extracellular purulent and serous fluids was performed (13). ADC values of serous fluids were close to those of free water, whereas ADC values for purulent fluids were significantly lower.

In 1996 Ebisu et al (14) reported restricted diffusion in a cerebral abscess. Guo et al (3) confirmed these DW findings in large abscesses while showing that smaller abscesses had nearly normal ADC values. A possible explanation for this observation is that the small size leads to difficulties in region-of-interest positioning and ADC measurements. Another explanation is that the content of small abscesses results in a normal rate of water diffusion. Other investigators (4) have suggested that variable concentrations of inflammatory cells and bacteria are present with different pathogenic organisms and that the host immune response and the age of an abscess might influence the viscosity of the pus, resulting in variations in ADC values. In our patients, all abscess cavities initially had high signal intensity on trace DW images and low ADC values consistent with restricted diffusion.

After the first optimistic reports about using DW imaging to distinguish brain abscesses from necrotic neoplasms were published, other studies (14,15) showed that restricted diffusion in a ring-enhancing lesion might be characteristic but not pathognomonic of brain abscess. Hartmann et al (16) found restricted diffusion in one metastatic adenocarcinoma and unrestricted diffusion in one postoperative abscess cavity. The reasons for restricted diffusion in this particular metastasis remain unclear. Possible explanations for high signal intensity on trace DW images of processes other than pyogenic brain abscess include high cellularity and reduced extracellular space, as seen in lymphomas and medulloblastomas (16). In two cases of lymphoma, restricted diffusion was demonstrated as high signal intensity on trace DW images and low ADC (16). Tung et al ( 15) reported restricted diffusion in two cases of metastases and in one case of radiation necrosis. Hemorrhagic metastasis had high signal intensity on DW images in another report (17).

After a cerebral abscess is diagnosed, the decision for surgical versus medical treatment is made immediately. However, the management of brain abscesses remains somewhat controversial, mainly because of discordant results from studies in small patient groups. CT-guided stereotactic aspiration of brain abscesses is minimally invasive, it results in minimal morbidity and mortality, and it is currently a valid alternative to the traditional surgical methods (18). Published results indicate a combined surgical and medical approach is optimal for the treatment of brain abscesses (19). Most authors advocate aspiration of small solitary abscesses for diagnostic purposes, followed by a 6–8-week course of intravenous antibiotics and surgical drainage of all abscesses larger than 2.5 cm in diameter and combined with 6–8 weeks of intravenous antibiotics (20). CT scanning or MR imaging performed biweekly or with any sign of clinical deterioration is needed to closely monitor for evidence of abscess growth or treatment failure that prompts another intervention. This imaging interval is based on the results of a study of 102 patients with brain abscesses that were monitored with weekly CT scans (21). Abscess size substantially decreased at a mean of 2.1 weeks after the initiation of therapy. The resolution of ring enhancement and the disappearance of the low-signal-intensity capsule on T2-weighted images indicate a sufficient therapeutic response. Repeated surgical drainage is recommended if an abscess enlarges after 2 weeks of antibiotic therapy or if it fails to resolve after 3–4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. In one study, 43 surgical procedures were performed in 13 patients, eight (62%) of whom required more than one surgical procedure (20). Therefore, treatment failure is not unusual.

To our knowledge, no published reports have described DW image findings of treated brain abscesses or their appearance on follow-up DW images. All surgically drained abscesses in our study showed a signal intensity change on trace DW images at first follow-up study. They changed from initial high signal intensity to low signal intensity, indicating the disappearance of purulent content. In one patient who was treated with only medication, follow-up DW images and MR images showed similar changes, indicating a good therapeutic response. Our study clearly showed the value of DW imaging in the surveillance of therapy for brain abscesses; two abscesses showed persistent high signal intensity on trace images and low ADC values suggesting the presence of pus despite therapy (one treated surgically, and one treated with medication only). Laboratory parameters were well correlated with these imaging findings (and also in patients whose findings showed unrestricted diffusion in the cavities of successfully treated abscesses).

The imaging, clinical, and laboratory findings altered patient care. In two patients in whom DW images suggested re-accumulation of pus, a second surgical intervention was performed and confirmed the presence of pus. With contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, the differentiation of purulent fluid from serous fluid inside the abscess cavity is not possible. On visual inspection of the postcontrast T1-weighted images in these patients with relapse, the decrease in size of the abscess cavities suggested a good therapeutic response, but this was not the case. In one patient, the size of the abscess remained stable, and in the other, growth was observed. In a partially treated cavity, the continuous accumulation of a substantial amount of pus might be necessary before the abscess enlarges again.

Limitations of our investigation include the small number of patients; therefore, our imaging findings and conclusions should be interpreted as preliminary and subject to further investigation. Additionally we cannot exclude the possibility that postsurgical blood and antibiotic solution in the abscess cavities may alter their signal intensity on DW images. However, blood products and the free water and antibiotic-containing solutions should result in lower signal intensity on DW images and not restricted diffusion. Therefore, it is also possible that magnetic susceptibility effects of blood might have obscured a small amount of residual pus in the immediate postdrainage period, resulting in signal intensity loss. This would have resulted in the loss of signal intensity on trace DW images and ADC maps, an appearance not seen in any of our patients. With regard to follow-up intervals, weekly MR imaging studies are indicated during antibiotic therapy and in the week afterward (or sooner if the patients experience clinical deterioration).

Conclusion

Our preliminary experience indicates that trace DW imaging and ADC maps are useful in the post-treatment follow-up of brain abscesses. Decreased signal intensity on trace DW images and increasing ADC values in the abscess cavity correlated with successful treatment. Conversely, persisting or reappearing high signal intensity in the abscess cavity on trace DW images and low ADC values indicating restricted diffusion were seen in cases of treatment failure and were correlated with pus re-accumulation. Findings in successfully and unsuccessfully treated brain abscesses were similar on conventional MR images and did not allow for their differentiation; therefore, we believe that DW imaging may play an important role in evaluating treated brain abscess. Further studies with a larger number of abscesses managed with ongoing medical or surgical therapy and imaged in different stages are needed to make solid conclusions. The degree of viscosity, the causative organism, and the level of protein in the abscess cavity may affect DW image findings and ADC values.

References

  1. Falcone S, Post MJ. Encephalitis, cerebritis, and brain abscess: pathophysiology and imaging findings. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2000;10:333–353
  2. Stadnik TW, Chaskis C, Michotte A, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR-Imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR-imaging and histologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:969–976
  3. Guo AC, Provenzale JM, Cruz LCH, et al. Cerebral abscesses: investigation using apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Neuroradiology 2001;43 ,370–374
  4. Kim YJ, Chang KH, Song IC, et al. Brain abscess and necrotic or cystic brain tumor: discrimination with signal intensity on diffusion weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1487–1490
  5. Stadnik TW, Demaerel P, Luypaert RR, et al. Imaging tutorial: differential diagnosis of bright lesions on diffusion-weighted MR images. Radiographics 2003;23:7 ; Erratum in: Radiographics 2003;23:686
  6. Leuthard EC, Wippold FJ, Oswood MC, Rich KM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the preoperative assessment of brain abscesses. Surg Neurol 2002;58:395—402
  7. Guzman R, Barth A, Lovblad, et al. Use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating purulent brain processes from cystic brain tumors. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1101–1107
  8. Lai PH, Ho JT, Chen WL, et al. Brain abscess and necrotic brain tumor: discrimination with proton MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1369–1377
  9. Tsui EY, Chan JH, Cheung YK, Lai KF, Ong D, Ng SH. Evaluation of cerebral abscesses by diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2002;26:347–351
  10. Deprechins B, Stadnik T, Koerts G, Shabana W, Breucq C, Osteaux M. Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1252–1257
  11. Le Bihan D. Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991;7:1–30
  12. Castillo M, Mukherji SK. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of intracranial lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000;21:405–416
  13. Spüntrup E, Bucker A, Adam G, van Vaals JJ, Gunther RW. Differentiation of serous and purulent fluids in vitro and in vivo by means of diffusion-weighted MRI. Roefo Fortschr Geb Roentgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001;173:65–71
  14. Ebisu T, Tanaka C, Umeda M, et al. Discrimination of brain abscess from necrotic or cystic tumors by diffusion -weighted echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:11:1113–1116
  15. Tung GA, Evangelista P, Rogg JM, Duncan JA III. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses: is markedly decreased water diffusion specific for brain abscess? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:709—712
  16. Hartmann M, Jansen O, Heiland S, Sommer C, Muenkel K, Sartor K. Restricted diffusion within ring enhancement is not pathognomonic for brain abscess. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1738–1742
  17. Mori H, Abe O, Aoki S, et al. Hemorrhagic brain metastasis with high signal intensity on diffusion-weighted MR imaging: A case report. Acta Radiol 2002;43:563–566
  18. Boviatsis EJ, Kouyialis AT, Stranjalis G, Korfias S, Sakas DE. CT-guided stereotactic aspiration of brain abscesses. Neurosurg Rev 2003;26:206–209
  19. Orhan B, Altay S, Kaan E, Haluk E, Serra S, Cicek B. Stereotactic surgery in the management of brain abscesses. Surg Neurol 1999;52:404–411
  20. Mamelak AN, Mampalam TJ, Obana WG, Rosenblum ML. Improved management of multiple brain abscesses. Neurosurgery 1995;36:76–85
  21. Mampalam TJ, Rosenblum ML. Trends in the management of bacterial brain abscesses: a review of 102 cases over 17 years. Neurosurgery 1988;23:451–458
  • Received December 30, 2003.
  • Accepted after revision March 12, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire