Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Reply

Reply:

T. Granberg
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2016, 37 (10) E70; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4896
T. Granberg
aDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
bDepartment of Radiology Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T. Granberg

We thank Vargas et al for their interest in our work and agree that synthetic MR imaging indeed is a promising technique with many potential applications for both clinical practice and research. As the authors mention, there are similarities between synthetic MR imaging and MR fingerprinting in their potential to reduce scanning time and provide quantitative MR imaging measurements to more objectively characterize tissue properties.1

In terms of clinical applications, SyMRI (SyntheticMR, Linköping, Sweden) has come far in making the sequence available on clinical scanners and integrating the analysis software in the clinical PACS system, making it feasible for clinical practice.2 Further validations of the technique are expected, and recently its quantification of proton-density, T1, and T2 have been shown to be accurate and reproducible, even with different coils.3 These results are promising for multicenter and longitudinal use. A precision study of synthetic MR imaging across scanners and field strengths would, therefore, be especially valuable for future studies and is planned. There are also areas for future developments of the technique, in which FLAIR artifacts are currently being addressed. 3D and further accelerated acquisitions remain on the wish list. In our group, we are currently evaluating nonconventional synthetic contrast weightings, such as phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting cortical involvement in multiple sclerosis, and more advanced tissue modeling based on the relaxometry. Other likely future applications include spinal imaging and body imaging, such as musculoskeletal imaging.

Meanwhile, MR fingerprinting is still in the early phases of development with many promising applications. How and where these techniques can be applied and provide clinically important and possibly complementing information remains to be explored. As often found in MR imaging, the main bottleneck in terms of possibilities for both techniques is our imagination.4

References

  1. 1.
    European Society of Radiology (ESR). Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: a promising new approach to obtain standardized imaging biomarkers from MRI. Insights Imaging 2015;6:163–65 doi:10.1007/s13244-015-0403-3 pmid:25800993
  2. 2.
    1. Granberg T,
    2. Uppman M,
    3. Hashim F, et al
    . Clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a diagnostic and volumetric validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1023–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4665 pmid:26797137
  3. 3.
    1. Krauss W,
    2. Gunnarsson M,
    3. Andersson T, et al
    . Accuracy and reproducibility of a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging method for concurrent measurements of tissue relaxation times and proton density. Magn Reson Imaging 2015;33:584–91 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.013 pmid:25708264
  4. 4.
    1. Ma D,
    2. Pierre EY,
    3. Jiang Y, et al
    . Music-based magnetic resonance fingerprinting to improve patient comfort during MRI examinations. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:2303–14 doi:10.1002/mrm.25818 pmid:26178439
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire