Comparison of study end points between SAPT and DAPTa
SAPT (n = 90) | DAPT (n = 132) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Complications | |||
Thromboembolic (all) | 6 | 12 | .188 |
Thromboembolic (permanently disabling) | 0 | 5 | <.001b |
Hemorrhagic | 0 | 3 | .003b |
Intimal hyperplasia/asymptomatic parent artery occlusion | 3 (2.9%) mild/3 (2.9%) | 6 (4.0%) mild/2 (1.3%) | .768 |
Radiologic and clinical follow-up | |||
Follow-up duration | 18 (SD, 12.3) (3–60) | 18 (SD, 12.6) (6–74) | .553 |
Complete occlusion (RROC I) at latest follow-up | 82 (80.4%) | 115 (78.2%) | .367 |
Good clinical outcome at latest clinical follow-up (mRS 0-1) | 90 (100%) | 116 (87.8%) | <.001b |