Table 1:

Comparison of DWI and FLAIR DWI b = 1500 s/mm2 images

Tissue and TechniqueSISNRCNR
MeanσMeanσMeanσ
Air
    DWI48.415.2
    FLAIR DWI54.018.5
    % Difference−11.6
CSF
    DWI57.924.62.20.5−23.35.2
    FLAIR DWI48.018.31.70.3−14.93.9
    % Difference17.122.736.1
Globus pallidus
    DWI140.361.75.51.8−20.04.2
    FLAIR DWI120.049.54.51.3−12.23.7
    % Difference14.518.239.0
Gray matter
    DWI336.1117.513.22.9−12.23.5
    FLAIR DWI236.478.48.81.9−7.83.5
    % Difference29.733.336.1
Insular cortex
    DWI409.8148.915.93.1−9.64.5
    FLAIR DWI255.581.89.51.9−7.13.8
    % Difference37.740.326.0
Ischemic tissue
    DWI654.3237.025.55.1
    FLAIR DWI456.7183.616.64.0
    % Difference30.234.9
Putamen
    DWI229.098.58.82.3−16.64.9
    FLAIR DWI155.361.35.81.7−10.83.8
    % Difference32.234.134.9
White matter
    DWI407.5148.016.03.8−9.54.3
    FLAIR DWI346.7124.412.82.5−3.83.2
    % Difference14.920.060.0
  • Note.—One-way ANOVA of DWI and FLAIR DWI for each tissue showed that all means differed significantly with (P < .001) except for the mean SI and SNR of the globus pallidus (P < .05) and the CNR of the insula (P < .05). CNRs reported are negative because the ischemic tissue has the most intense signal on the image.