Test–retest results for example subjects in Figure 2
| Subject 1 | Subject 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S 1 | S 2 | S 1 | S 2 | ||
| fMRI acquisition quality | tSNRmed | 107.0 | 100.9 | 102.8 | 93.9 |
| Motion (mm) | 1.08 | 0.58 | 0.38 | 0.34 | |
| Motion correl* | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.20 | |
| Inferior frontal ROI | LIF-Ave | 0.94 | 0.88 | −0.83 | −0.80 |
| LIVOL | 0.87 | 0.70 | −0.59 | −0.47 | |
| Volume (mm3) | 4102 | 3893 | 2506 | 5881 | |
| Rvolume | 97.4 | 59.8 | |||
| Roverlap | 63.2 | 37.6 | |||
| Temporoparietal ROI | LIF-Ave | 0.98 | 0.90 | −0.89 | −0.92 |
| LIVOL | 1.00 | 1.00 | −0.65 | −0.76 | |
| Volume (mm3) | 1644 | 1506 | 2431 | 5364 | |
| Rvolume | 95.6 | 62.4 | |||
| Roverlap | 58.2 | 35.2 | |||
Note:— fMRI indicates functional MR imaging; ROI, region of interest; tSNRmed, first temporal signal-to-noise ratio estimate; LIF-Ave, LI calculated using F values; LIVOL, LI calculated using activation volume. Rvolume, reproducibility of volume of activation; Roverlap, reproducibility of location of activation and volume of activation combined. Volume and concordance ratios are for the language dominant hemisphere.
* Correlation between head motion and experimental paradigm.