Comparison between Neuro3D and SPM analysis in language paradigm experiments
| Verbal Fluency (%) | Semantic Judgment (%) | Oral Comprehension (%) | Total (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overl | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 2 (18.2) | 4 (12.1) | |
| Tth | Part.overl | 6 (54.5) | 9 (81.8) | 9 (81.8) | 24 (72.7) |
| Not overl | 3 (27.3) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 5 (15.2) | |
| Not pres | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 4 (36.4) | 6 (18.2) | |
| Noise | Pres.not inter | 6 (54.5) | 7 (63.6) | 7 (63.6) | 20 (60.6) |
| Interfere | 4 (36.4) | 3 (27.3) | 0 (0) | 7 (21.2) | |
| Overl | 5 (45.4) | 5 (45.4) | 6 (54.5) | 16 (48.5) | |
| Tmax | Part.overl | 3 (27.3) | 4 (36.4) | 5 (45.4) | 12 (36.4) |
| Not overl | 3 (27.3) | 2 (18.2) | 0 (0) | 5 (15.1) | |
| SPM | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Cluster size | Neuro3D | 10 (90.9) | 10 (90.9) | 10 (90.9) | 30 (90.9) |
| Equal | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 3 (9.1) | |
| SPM | 10 (90.9) | 10 (90.9) | 8 (72.7) | 28 (84.8) | |
| Preference | Neuro3D | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (3.1) |
| Equal | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 2 (18.2) | 4 (12.1) |
Note:—Overl indicates overlapping; inter, interfering; part.overl, partially overlapping; pres, present.