Table 2:

Imaging characteristics of 28 patients with LEC of the salivary gland

CharacteristicsNo. of Patients/Values
Tumor location
    Parotid18 (64.3%)
    Submandibular gland8 (28.5%)
    Palate1 (3.6%)
    Sublingual gland1 (3.6%)
Tumor size (cm)1.6∼7 (3.5)
Tumor margin
    Partially defined13 (46.4%)
    Well-defined5 (17.9%)
    Ill-defined10 (35.7%)
Morphologic patterns
    Type 15 (17.9%)
    Type 216 (57.1%)
    Type 37 (25.0%)
Inner nature
    Necrosis4 (14.3%)
    Calcification0 (0%)
Density on unenhanced CT (n = 23)
    Slightly hypodense19 (82.6%)
    Isodensity4 (17.4%)
Enhancement degree on CT (n = 23)
    Poor6 (26.1%)
    Moderate14 (56.5%)
    Intense3 (17.4%)
Signal intensity on MR imaging (n = 6)
    T1WI
        Hyperintense1 (16.7%)
        Isointense5 (83.3%)
    T2WI
        Hypointense4 (66.7%)
        Hyperintense2 (33.3%)
Enhancement degree on MR imaging (n = 6)
    Poor1 (16.7%)
    Moderate4 (66.6%)
    Intense1 (16.7%)
Inner nature after contrast enhancement
    Homogeneous16 (57.1%)
    Heterogeneous12 (42.9%)
Adjacent structure invasion5 (17.9%)
    Bone destroyed2 (7.1%)
Pathologic lymph nodes17 (60.7%)