Table 1:

Comparison of the degree of stenosis and the minimal luminal diameter

Degree of Stenosis (%)Minimal Luminal Diameter (mm)
Observer 1Observer 2Observer 1Observer 2
DSAa71.72 ± 21.21b70.64 ± 23.18b0.50 ± 0.40c0.51 ± 0.42c
    Interobserver agreement0.930 (0.868–0.963)0.916 (0.838–0.956)
HR-MRa74.27 ± 20.39b70.42 ± 23.12b0.61 ± 0.49c0.59 ± 0.48c
    Interobserver agreement0.909 (0.828–0.952)0.915 (0.836–0.956)
Agreement
    Continuous valuesd0.937 (0.882–0.967)0.943 (0.892–0.970)0.892 (0.791–0.944)0.949 (0.902–0.974)
    Classified stenosise0.548 (0.310–0.785)0.614 (0.403–0.825)
Correlation
    Continuous valuesf0.861 (P < .001)0.892 (P < .001)0.816 (P < .001)0.879 (P < .001)
    Classified stenosisf0.773 (P < .001)0.766 (P < .001)
  • a Data indicate the mean ± SD.

  • b There were no significant differences between DSA and HR-MR (P > .05).

  • c There were significant differences between DSA and HR-MR (P < .05).

  • d Agreement refers to the interclass correlation coefficients between DSA and HR-MR, and data in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals.

  • e Agreement refers to the κ values between DSA and HR-MR, and data in parentheses indicate 95% confidence intervals.

  • f Correlation refers to the Spearman R values between DSA and HR-MR.