Table 1:

Quantitative and qualitative conspicuity assessment

CR Median (IQR)CNR Median (IQR)Visual Score
BestaIntermediateWorst
All CELs (n = 54)
    3D-IR GRE MPRAGE80.88 (43.71–125.65)10.02 (5.71–16.06)15 (27.8%)26 (48.1%)13 (24.1%)
    3D-TSE SPACE100.92b,c (73–191.59)19.17b,c (13.21–36.01)54 (100%)00
    3D-GRE VIBE85.86b,c (43.71–135.22)16.76b,c (11–37.22)24 (44.4%)b25 (46.3%)5 (9.3%)b
Gliomas (n = 38)
    3D-IR GRE MPRAGE90.01 (48.29–125.21)10.51 (5.68–17.33)9 (23.7%)19 (50%)10 (26.3%)
    3D-TSE SPACE125.64b,c (88.41–187.45)24.46b,c (12.55–41.23)38 (100%)00
    3D-GRE VIBE94.19b,c (58.34–88.95)16.22d,c (9.89–27.25)16 (42.1%)d18 (47.4%)4 (10.5%)d
Metastases (n = 16)
    3D-IR GRE MPRAGE54.71 (35.24–130.01)9.30 (6.77–12.29)6 (37.5%)7 (43.8%)3 (18.8%)
    3D-TSE SPACE80.04b,c (63.13–200)17.15b,c (13.63–21.26)16 (100%)00
    3D-GRE VIBE72.95b,c (54.19–154.43)17.26b,c (12.14–31.18)8 (50%)7 (43.8%)1 (6.3%)
  • Note:—IR indicates inversion recovery; GRE, gradient recalled-echo; CR, contrast rate; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; IQR, interquartile range.

  • a Because SPACE in the visual assessment was constantly rated as best in all cases, no statistical comparison tests were performed in this analysis.

  • b P < .001.

  • c P ≤ .01 (adjusted for the order of sequence acquisition; FSL General Linear Model).

  • d P = .001 (compared with MPRAGE, Wilcoxon test).