Table 3:

Influence of angioarchitectural features on the treatment success—summary and univariate models

Angioarchitectural Feature, Treatment Success RateP Value (Univariate Analysis)
LocationTransverse/Sigmoid Sinus, 80.4%Tentorial/Petrosal, 72.0%Superior Sagittal Sinus, 95.0%Torcular, 100%Anterior Cranial Fossa, 83.3%Sphenoparietal Sinus, 75.0%.084
Cognard typeI, 60.0%IIa, 75.0%IIb, 100%IIa+b 70.0%III, 96.4%IV, 80.4%.047a
Borden typeI, 66.7%II, 76.9%III, 86.1%.144
Venous drainageInto dural venous sinus, 71.4%Directly into cortical veins, 85.4%.099
Presence of cortical venous refluxYes, 85.9%No, 61.1%.013
No. of feeding arteries<10, 92.6%≥10, 71.4%.004a
Bilateral feedersYes, 83.3%No, 80.4%.686
Pial artery supplyYes, 77.8%No, 83.1%.531
Involvement of the middle meningeal arteryYes, 80.2%No, 92.9%.252
Involvement of the occipital arteryYes, 80.7%No, 85.2%.602
Involvement of the internal carotid arterybYes, 70.7%No, 88.4%.020a
Involvement of the vertebral arterybYes, 75.6%No, 85.5%.193
Involvement of the superficial temporal arteryYes, 81.3%No, 82.1%.921
Involvement of the ascending pharyngeal arteryYes, 61.5%No, 88.1%.002a
  • a Statistically significant.

  • b Dural branches.