Table 3:

Comparison of unnecessary FNA rates for thyroid cancer diagnosis in all nodulesa

No. of FNAsNo. of Malignant Nodules among FNA NodulesNo. of Benign Nodules among FNA NodulesUnnecessary FNA Rate
CAD based on K-TIRADS (categories 3, 4, and 5)85.5 (388/454)42.0 (163/388)58.0 (225/388)49.6 (225/454)
CAD based on K-TIRADS (categories 4 and 5)64.3 (292/454)51.0 (149/292)49.0 (143/292)31.5 (143/454)
CAD based on ATA-TIRADS (categories 3, 4, and 5)79.3 (360/454)43.9 (158/360)56.1 (202/360)44.5 (202/454)
CAD based on ATA-TIRADS (categories 4 and 5)55.3 (251/454)57.5 (146/254)42.5 (108/254)23.8 (108/454)
CAD based on possible diagnosis41.4 (188/454)72.3 (136/188)27.7 (52/188)11.5 (52/454)
Radiologist K-TIRADS (categories 3, 4, and 5)76.2 (346/454)47.1 (163/346)52.9 (183/346)40.3 (183/454)
Radiologist K-TIRADS (categories 4 and 5)48.5 (220/454)69.5 (153/220)30.5 (67/220)14.8 (67/454)
Radiologist ATA-TIRADS (categories 3, 4, and 5)68.3 (310/454)48.4 (150/310)51.6 (160/310)35.2 (160/454)
Radiologist ATA-TIRADS (categories 4 and 5)43.0 (195/454)71.8 (140/195)28.2 (55/195)12.1 (55/454)
Radiologist based on possible diagnosis32.8 (149/454)91.9 (137/149)8.1 (12/149)2.6 (12/454)
  • a The numbers are percentages. Categories 5, 4, and 3 refer to high-, intermediate-, and low-suspicion nodules in each guideline.