Table 2:

Radiomics model performance for prediction of OS and PFS

Outcome/ MR Imaging Time PointTraining SiteTesting SiteOOB Training, Mean
C-Index (95% CI)
Testing AUC, Mean
C-Index (95% CI)
OS
 PretreatmentSites 2–6 (n = 72Site 1 (n = 31)0.471 (0.467–0.474)0.521 (0.515–0.527)
Site 1, 3–6 (n = 74)Site 2 (n = 29)0.523 (0.517–0.530)0.472 (0.468–0.476)
Site 1–2 (n = 60)Site 3–6 (n = 43)0.529 (0.526–0.532)0.485 (0.483–0.488)
 First on-treatmentSites 2–6 (n = 70)Site 1 (n = 32)0.690 (0.688–0.692)0.750 (0.747–0.753)
Site 1, 3–6 (n = 73)Site 2 (n = 29)0.710 (0.708–0.713)0.748 (0.744–0.752)
Site 1–2 (n = 61)Site 3–6 (n = 41)0.721 (0.719–0.723)0.692 (0.691–0.694)
PFS
 PretreatmentSites 2–6 (n = 72)Site 1 (n = 31)0.469 (0.467–0.472)0.524 (0.518–0.530)
Site 1, 3–6 (n = 74)Site 2 (n = 29)0.521 (0.515–0.526)0.472 (0.469–0.476)
Site 1–2 (n = 60)Site 3–6 (n = 43)0.528 (0.524–0.531)0.486 (0.484–0.488)
 First on-treatmentSites 2–6 (n = 70)Site 1 (n = 32)0.660 (0.658–0.663)0.691 (0.688-0.693)
Site 1, 3–6 (n = 73)Site 2 (n = 29)0.641 (0.640–0.643)0.715 (0.712–0.717)
Site 1–2 (n = 61)Site 3–6 (n = 41)0.648 (0.645–0.650)0.680 (0.677–0.683)
  • Note:—OOB indicate out of bag.