TABLE 2:

CBF data

MeasurerCBF in ROI on 2D Displays, mL/100g/minMean Hemispheric CBF on 2D Displays, mL/100g/minArea of Decreased Cortical CBF on 3D Displays, cm2
Cases*
 With DIND (n = 15)25.0 ± 5.135.5 ± 5.522.6 ± 10.0
 Without DIND (n = 43)37.0 ± 4.838.0 ± 5.37.4 ± 6.6
Size of infarction
 Large (n = 5)21.8 ± 4.332.6 ± 3.832.3 ± 6.6§
 Small (n = 10)26.6 ± 4.636.9 ± 5.817.8 ± 7.5
Prognosis at 3 mo
 Poor (n = 6)22.2 ± 4.233.7 ± 4.829.8 ± 7.9
 Fair (n = 9)26.9 ± 4.536.7 ± 5.817.8 ± 8.4
  • * The CBF data obtained at the onset of DIND in the 15 DIND cases were compared with the data on routine studies in the 43 cases without DIND.

  • P < .001 compared with cases without DIND.

  • The CBF data obtained at the onset of DIND in the 15 DIND cases were compared.

  • § P = .006 compared with small size of infarction.

  • P = .043 compared with fair prognosis.