Table 4:

Correlation between whole-disk and partial-disk segmentation methods^{^a}

	Nondegenerated Group				Degenerated Group
	T2 Mapping		T1ρ Mapping		T2 Mapping		T1ρ Mapping
	R	CI 99%	R	CI 99%	R	CI 99%	R	CI 99%
WDS × PDS-6	0.96	0.95–0.97	0.97	0.96–0.97	0.97	0.95–0.98	0.97	0.95–0.98
WDS ×PDS-5A	0.75	0.69–0.81	0.96	0.95–0.97	0.69	0.53–0.80	0.96	0.94–0.98
WDS × PDS-5B	0.91	0.88–0.93	0.95	0.93–0.96	0.94	0.90–0.96	0.93	0.89–0.96
WDS × PDS-4	0.90	0.88–0.93	0.95	0.94–0.96	0.94	0.91–0.96	0.95	0.92–0.97
WDS × PDS-3	0.83	0.78–0.86	0.90	0.87–0.92	0.89	0.82–0.93	0.89	0.82–0.93
WDS × PDS-1	0.73	0.67–0.79	0.80	0.75–0.84	0.74	0.61–0.84	0.78	0.66–0.86
WDS × CROI	0.74	0.67–0.79	0.88	0.85–0.91	0.82	0.71–0.88	0.83	0.72–0.89
WDS × NP	0.72	0.65–0.72	0.80	0.74–0.84	0.77	0.63–0.85	0.76	0.63–0.85
WDS × PAF	0.42	0.30–0.52	0.59	0.49–0.67	0.48	0.25–0.66	0.65	0.47–0.77
WDS × AAF	0.40	0.28–0.51	0.58	0.48–0.66	0.50	0.27–0.67	0.54	0.33–0.70

↵a The result of the correlation is expressed by R confidence intervals of 99%.