Table 2:

Procedure and device characteristics

CharacteristicsIPH/SubtotalaORP Value
Preprocedural antiplatelet use
    Yes2.5% (17/681)0.93 (0.27–3.23).91
    No2.7% (3/112)Ref
Preprocedural platelet aggregation studies
    Yes2.5% (14/564)0.95 (0.36–2.49).91
    No2.6% (6/229)Ref
Heparin administration
    Yes2.6% (18/704)1.14 (0.26–5.00).86
    No2.2% (2/89)Ref
Reversal of heparin
    Yes5.6% (1/18)2.33 (0.29–18.49).43
    No2.5% (17/689)Ref
No. of PEDs used
    11.7% (9/533)Ref
    23.3% (6/183)1.97 (0.69–5.62).96
    3+6.6% (5/76)4.10 (1.34–12.58).04
How multiple PEDs were used
    Overlapping1.4% (2/140)Ref
    Multiple layers7.5% (3/40)5.59 (0.90–34.72).96
    Additional length7.9% (6/76)5.91 (1.16–30.06).96
    Multiple layers and overlapping0.0% (0/2)NA
Sheaths used
    Medical Arrow-Flexb
        Yes0.0% (0/35)NA
        No3.5% (19/546)
    Medical Shuttle Select
        Yes3.2% (8/249)0.97 (0.38–2.45).95
        No3.3% (11/332)Ref
    Pinnacle Destinationc
        Yes5.9% (2/34)1.95 (0.43–8.80).39
        No3.1% (17/547)Ref
Microcatheter used
    Marksmand
        Yes3.2% (18/557)0.77 (0.10–6.00).80
        No4.2% (1/24)Ref
  • a The number of IPHs does not add up to 20 in all subanalyses because these data were missing in some patients.

  • b Teleflex, Limerick, Pennsylvania.

  • c Terumo, Tokyo, Japan.

  • d Covidien, Irvine, California.