Table 3:

Comparison of brain SI values and DN-pons and GP-thalamus SI ratios between gadobenate-exposed and GBCA-naïve control subjectsa

Reader/Patient GroupDNPonsGPThalamusDN-Pons RatioGP-Thalamus Ratio
Reader 1
    Exposed366.4 ± 8.62370.5 ± 8.59360.5 ± 10.2360.3 ± 9.990.989 ± 0.0041.0 ± 0.003
    Control374.3 ± 8.12377.0 ± 8.65364.4 ± 10.3363.2 ± 9.880.994 ± 0.0041.0 ± 0.002
    P value.526.6090.796.842.383.572
Reader 2
    Exposed367.8 ± 9.33373.6 ± 8.84392.3 ± 11.17370.5 ± 10.660.984 ± 0.0061.06 ± 0.009
    Control370.9 ± 9.70381.9 ± 10.25380.5 ± 11.59373.3 ± 11.10.972 ± 0.0071.02 ± 0.009
    P value.826.547.476.859.217.185
Reader 3
    Exposed389.2 ± 9.79374.5 ± 8.63383.6 ± 10.68356.9 ± 9.061.04 ± 0.0091.07 ± 0.012
    Control386.3 ± 10.14380.9 ± 10.73383.5 ± 12.98365.6 ± 11.671.02 ± 0.0091.05 ± 0.011
    P value.839.642.996.555.101.134
Reader 4
    Exposed365.3 ± 8.40372.6 ± 8.71381.1 ± 9.95369.9 ± 9.540.98 ± 0.0061.03 ± 0.006
    Control368.3 ± 9.47378.5 ± 10.28381.8 ± 10.57376.3 ± 9.280.97 ± 0.0051.01 ± 0.007
    P value.816.661.959.644.388.083
Reader 5
    Exposed386.5 ± 9.82374.9 ± 9.04392.9 ± 10.64371.0 ± 9.681.03 ± 0.0131.06 ± 0.006
    Control386.3 ± 10.85383.4 ± 10.71385.4 ± 12.47376.8 ± 11.171.01 ± 0.0071.02 ± 0.009
    P value.987.547.647.699.147.002

  • ↵a Values are mean ± standard error of the mean.