Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

LetterLetter

Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Is One of These Procedures the Best Choice for All Patients?

Mark E. Myers
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2004, 25 (7) 1297;
Mark E. Myers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a widespread problem in elderly populations, with approximately 700,000 VCFs occurring in the United States each year as a result of osteoporosis. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are two minimally invasive procedures that are increasingly used to treat VCFs. Both procedures stabilize VCFs by injecting bone cement into the vertebral body, with kyphoplasty having the additional step of reducing the fracture with an inflatable bone tamp (IBT).

Both of these procedures provide excellent pain relief for most patients, with a low incidence of serious complications. It has been suggested, however, that kyphoplasty may afford a lower risk of clinical complications than vertebroplasty. Use of the IBT can elevate the vertebral endplates toward their prefracture levels and create an intravertebral cavity. This cavity allows for the injection of more viscous cement under lower pressure, which may result in a lower rate of clinically significant cement leaks.

In addition to creating a cavity, the potential fracture reduction would restore vertebral height and correct kyphotic deformity. This can reduce the risk of serious comorbidities related to kyphotic deformity, many of which involve pulmonary dysfunction. It has also been suggested that kyphotic deformity resulting from VCFs might increase the risk of subsequent VCFs (1).

Recently, there have been reports of height restoration and kyphosis correction in a few vertebroplasty studies. These studies found the greatest degree of height restoration in vertebrae exhibiting intravertebral clefts, or pseudarthosis. In some of these studies, physicians were able to manipulate the spine through padding and positioning during the procedure. Although height restoration and kyphosis correction were observed, they were not to the same degree as that observed in published kyphoplasty studies (2).

The low cost and short procedural time associated with vertebroplasty make the procedure an attractive choice for VCFs not exhibiting a high degree of kyphotic deformity or vertebral height loss. Although vertebroplasty may successfully treat the pain experienced by patients with severe vertebral deformity, it does not address deformity to the same degree as kyphoplasty. Because of the risks and comorbidities often associated with kyphotic deformity, it is a common symptom of VCFs that needs to be addressed.

The degree of height restoration and kyphotic deformity correction experienced by kyphoplasty patients leads me to believe that it may become the standard of care for VCFs under certain circumstances. In a 2003 publication by Fourney and colleagues (3), both procedures were performed using a decision tree to determine which procedure was best for which patients. They performed kyphoplasty for patients with significant vertebral collapse, kyphosis greater than 20°, or disruption of the posterior vertebral cortex, whereby more controlled cement delivery was advantageous to minimize risks of spinal compromise. In the future, I believe many clinicians may use decision trees of this nature to determine which procedure is best for each individual case.

References

  1. ↵
    Phillips FM. Minimally invasive treatments of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [Suppl]. Spine 2003;28:S45–S53
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Teng MM, Wei CJ, Wei LC, et al. Kyphosis correction and height restoration effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1893–1900
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Fourney DR, Schomer DF, Nader R, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for painful vertebral body fractures in cancer patients [Suppl]. J Neurosurg 2003;98:S21–S30
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 7
1 Aug 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Is One of These Procedures the Best Choice for All Patients?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Mark E. Myers
Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Is One of These Procedures the Best Choice for All Patients?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2004, 25 (7) 1297;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Is One of These Procedures the Best Choice for All Patients?
Mark E. Myers
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2004, 25 (7) 1297;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Reply:
  • Brain AVM’s Nidus: What if We Hadn’t Understood Anything?
  • Letter to the Editor regarding “Automated Volumetric Software in Dementia: Help or Hindrance to the Neuroradiologist?”
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire