Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Abstract

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in schemes for estimating volume of brain lesions on MR images in multiple sclerosis.

M Filippi, M A Horsfield, M Rovaris, T Yousry, M A Rocca, C Baratti, S Bressi and G Comi
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 1998, 19 (2) 239-244;
M Filippi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M A Horsfield
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Rovaris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Yousry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M A Rocca
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C Baratti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Bressi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Comi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

PURPOSE Our goal was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements of brain lesion load in multiple sclerosis (MS) by using two proposed acquisition schemes.

METHODS Three-millimeter-thick conventional spin-echo (CSE) and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) sequences were obtained and the lesions segmented using a semiautomated technique based on local thresholding to calculate intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. These were compared with images obtained from two separate MR units in which 5-mm CSE sequences were obtained and segmented by using the local thresholding technique and also by manual outlining.

RESULTS The intraobserver coefficient of variation was 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0% to 4.5%) for the 5-mm CSE sequence measured with manual outlining, 3.1% (95% CI, 2.5% to 3.2%) and 5.1% (95% CI, 4.1% to 5.6%) for the two sets of 5-mm CSE sequences measured using the local thresholding technique, 5.7% (95% CI, 3.9% to 6.6%) for the 3-mm CSE sequence, and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.1% to 2.7%) for the fast FLAIR sequence. The interobserver coefficient of variation was 7.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 8.7%) and 8.3% (95% CI, 6.4% to 9.6%) for the two sets of 5-mm CSE sequences, 7.3% (95% CI, 4.7% to 9.1%) for the 3-mm CSE sequence, and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.3% to 3.3%) for the fast FLAIR sequence. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of measurements obtained with the fast FLAIR technique was significantly better than those obtained with the other techniques.

CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that the intraobserver and interobserver variability in quantifying MS lesions can be reduced significantly with the use of fast FLAIR sequences, while no significant improvement is gained by reducing the section thickness from 5 mm to 3 mm.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 19, Issue 2
1 Feb 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intraobserver and interobserver variability in schemes for estimating volume of brain lesions on MR images in multiple sclerosis.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M Filippi, M A Horsfield, M Rovaris, T Yousry, M A Rocca, C Baratti, S Bressi, G Comi
Intraobserver and interobserver variability in schemes for estimating volume of brain lesions on MR images in multiple sclerosis.
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1998, 19 (2) 239-244;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Intraobserver and interobserver variability in schemes for estimating volume of brain lesions on MR images in multiple sclerosis.
M Filippi, M A Horsfield, M Rovaris, T Yousry, M A Rocca, C Baratti, S Bressi, G Comi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1998, 19 (2) 239-244;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Intraventricular CSF Pulsation Artifact on Fast Fluid-Attenuated Inversion-Recovery MR Images: Analysis of 100 Consecutive Normal Studies
  • A Comparison of MR Imaging with Fast-FLAIR, HASTE-FLAIR, and EPI-FLAIR Sequences in the Assessment of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
  • Memory Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis Corresponds to Juxtacortical Lesion Load on Fast Fluid-Attenuated Inversion-Recovery MR Images
  • Fluid-Attenuated Inversion-Recovery MR Imaging in Acute and Subacute Cerebral Intraventricular Hemorrhage
  • Interscanner Variation in Brain MR Lesion Load Measurements in Multiple Sclerosis Using Conventional Spin-Echo, Rapid Relaxation-Enhanced, and Fast-FLAIR Sequences
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire