The Fate of Neuroradiologic Abstracts Presented at National Meetings in 1993: Rate of Subsequent Publication in Peer-Reviewed, Indexed Journals

References

1. ↵
   Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. [published correction appears in JAMA 1994;272:1410] JAMA 1994;272:158-162

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. Yentis SM, Campbell FA, Lerman J. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:632-634

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. Juzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey J, Juzych L, Shin D. Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association for research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1879-1882

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. De Bellefeuille C, Morrison CA, Tannock IF. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol 1992;3:187-191

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. Juzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey JB, Parrow KA, Tsai CS, Briggs KS. Pattern of publication of ophthalmic abstracts in peer-reviewed journals. Ophthalmology 1991;98:553-556

   PubMed
6. Corry AM. A survey of the publication history of randomly selected IADR/AADR abstracts presented in 1983 and 1984. J Dent Res 1990;69:1453-1455

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. Weintraub WH. Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisal. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:11-13

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. Meranze J, Ellison N, Greenhow DE. Publications resulting from anesthesia meeting abstracts. Anesth Analg 1982;61:445-448

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Goldman L, Loscalzo A. Fate of cardiology research originally published in abstract form. N Engl J Med 1980;303:255-259

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. Gavazza JB, Foulkes GD, Meals RA. Publication pattern of papers presented at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand annual meeting. J Hand Surg [Am] 1996;21:742-745

    PubMed
11. ↵
    Soffer A. Beware the 200-word abstract. Arch Intern Med 1976;136:1232-1233

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. Kraft AR, Collins JA, Carey LC, Skinner DB. Art and logic in scientific communication: abstracts, presentations, and manuscripts. J Surg Res 1979;26:591-604

    CrossRefPubMed
13. Rubin HR, Redelmeier DA, Wu AW, Steinberg EP. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:255-258

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993;50:4967
15. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263:1385-1389

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards [see comments]. JAMA 1992;267:374-378

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Anonymous Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [see comments]. [published correction appears in JAMA 1998;279:510]. JAMA 1997;277:927-934

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. Chalmers I, Adams M, Dickersin K, et al. A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials. JAMA 1990;263:1401-1405

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993;703:135-146

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science