Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Coefficient Dav Is More Sensitive Than Fractional Anisotropy in Monitoring Progression of Irreversible Tissue Damage in Focal Nonactive Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbeg, Fabrizio Fasano, Gisela Hagberg, Ugo Nocentini, Massimo Filippi and Carlo Caltagirone
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2003, 24 (4) 663-670;
Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbeg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrizio Fasano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gisela Hagberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ugo Nocentini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Massimo Filippi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlo Caltagirone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Three examples of MS lesions (arrows) with different T1 appearance. Top, isointense lesion (FA=0.30 ± 0.06, coefficient Dav=1.10 ± 0.07 × 10−3 mm2/s); middle, mildly hypointense lesion (FA=0.27 ± 0.05, coefficient Dav=1.24 ± 0.06 × 10−3 mm2/s); bottom, severely hypointense lesion (FA=0.19 ± 0.04, coefficient Dav = 1.76 ± 0.07 × 10−3 mm2/s). For each row, from left to right: axial view fast spin-echo T2-weighted image, spin-echo T1-weighted image, coefficient Dav map, and FA map.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Scatter plots for the 76 lesions studied.

    A, Coefficient Dav versus SIlesion/SICSF ratio. Significant inverse correlation was shown.

    B, FA versus SIlesion/SICSF ratio. No correlation was shown.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    Mean values (± SD) for fractional anisotropy and coefficient Dav in the various investigated white matter brain regions

    FADav (×10−3 mm2/s)
    All plaques (n = 76)0.22 ± 0.071.54 ± 0.33
    NAWM regions (n=76)0.32 ± 0.091.00 ± 0.14
    NWM regions (n=76)0.37 ± 0.090.89 ± 0.08
    • Note.—FA indicates fractional anisotropy; Dav, average diffusivity; NAWM, normal appearing white matter; NWM, normal white matter. Note that FA is expressed as a unitless number that may range from 0 to 1 and that Dav is equal to one-third of the trace of the diffusion tensor.

      The P value was <.001 for all paired t tests between groups (plaques and NAWM regions, plaques and NWM regions, NAWM and NWM regions).

    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    Mean values (± SD) for absolute and relative fractional anisotropy and coefficient Dav in the three groups of lesions of increasing hypointensity on the T1-weighted images

    FADav (×10−3 mm2/s)ΔFA
    T1 isointense (n = 25)0.26 ± 0.071.29 ± 0.1719 ± 4
    T1 mildly hypointense (n=26)0.21 ± 0.061.54 ± 0.3123 ± 6
    T1 severely hypointense (n=25)0.19 ± 0.061.80 ± 0.3236 ± 4
    • Note.—FA indicates fractional anisotropy; Dav, averaged diffusivity; ΔFA, percentage FA variation in the lesion, obtained in relation to a symmetric normal appearing white matter area in the contralateral hemisphere.

Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 4
1 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Coefficient Dav Is More Sensitive Than Fractional Anisotropy in Monitoring Progression of Irreversible Tissue Damage in Focal Nonactive Multiple Sclerosis Lesions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbeg, Fabrizio Fasano, Gisela Hagberg, Ugo Nocentini, Massimo Filippi, Carlo Caltagirone
Coefficient Dav Is More Sensitive Than Fractional Anisotropy in Monitoring Progression of Irreversible Tissue Damage in Focal Nonactive Multiple Sclerosis Lesions
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2003, 24 (4) 663-670;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Coefficient Dav Is More Sensitive Than Fractional Anisotropy in Monitoring Progression of Irreversible Tissue Damage in Focal Nonactive Multiple Sclerosis Lesions
Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbeg, Fabrizio Fasano, Gisela Hagberg, Ugo Nocentini, Massimo Filippi, Carlo Caltagirone
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2003, 24 (4) 663-670;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Short-term surrogate biomarkers of chronic lesion expansion
  • Choroid plexus volume is enlarged in clinically isolated syndrome patients with optic neuritis
  • Mechanisms of central brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis
  • Choroid plexus volume predicts expansion of chronic lesions and brain atrophy
  • Loss of corticospinal tract integrity in early MS disease stages
  • Increased diffusivity in acute multiple sclerosis lesions predicts risk of black hole
  • Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis
  • A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire