Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleINTERVENTIONAL

Horner Syndrome Related to Ipsilateral Carotid Wall Hematoma after Stent Placement for the Treatment of Carotid Stenoses

Michael Rosenkranz, Bernd Eckert, Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Cornelius Weiller and Ulrich Sliwka
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2003, 24 (8) 1508-1511;
Michael Rosenkranz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernd Eckert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolf-Dirk Niesen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cornelius Weiller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Sliwka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We prospectively studied the incidence and natural history of Horner syndrome following stent-supported percutaneous angioplasty of the carotid artery (SPAC). We assessed the hypothesis that postinterventional Horner syndrome is related to ipsilateral carotid wall hematoma.

METHODS: We performed duplex sonography of the carotid arteries and clinical examination in 28 consecutive patients before and 4 hours ± 2, 24 hours ± 2, and 7 days ± 1 after SPAC.

RESULTS: Within 24 hours ± 2 after SPAC, 11 of the 28 patients developed ipsilateral Horner syndrome. Ten of these 11 patients had a postinterventional sonographic appearance of a carotid wall hematoma, whereas only two of the 17 patients without Horner syndrome had this finding (P < .001). In all patients, both Horner syndrome and carotid wall hematoma had resolved 7 days ± 1 after SPAC.

CONCLUSION: Horner syndrome appears to be a common yet transient event after SPAC. Although postinterventional Horner syndrome is significantly related to ipsilateral carotid wall hematoma, causality of the procedure-related formation of a carotid wall hematoma and oculosympathetic disturbance remains unproven.

The use of balloon angioplasty and stent placement for the treatment of carotid artery stenoses has gained increasing popularity. Over a period of 6 months, we saw several cases of Horner syndrome in patients who had been treated with stent-supported percutaneous angioplasty of the carotid artery (SPAC). Some of these patients did not have a complete Horner syndrome, but rather, pupillary dilatation in absence of eyelid ptosis (ie, partial Horner syndrome). We therefore saw the need for a prospective study of the incidence and natural history of Horner syndrome following SPAC. We assessed the hypothesis that Horner syndrome is related to the postinterventional appearance of an ipsilateral carotid wall hematoma.

Methods

Twenty-eight consecutive patients (four female, 24 male; mean age ± SD, 64.4 years ± 11.3) scheduled to undergo SPAC were enrolled in the study. The patients had a proximal, symptomatic, high-grade (≥70%; mean, 86.3% ± 8.3) internal carotid stenosis, according to the European Carotid Surgery Trial methods of measuring carotid stenosis (1). All carotid stenoses were due to atherosclerotic disease. None of the patients had undergone prior carotid artery interventions.

Pretreatment anticoagulation and antiplatelet medication regimens consisted of daily applications of aspirin (300 mg), clopidogrel (75 mg), and enoxaparin (1 mg per kilogram of body weight) for at least 3 days before SPAC. Immediately before the intervention, the activated clotting time was elevated to a minimum of 250 seconds by means of intravenous application of unfractionated heparin. Endovascular treatment was initiated by navigating a 7F introducer catheter into the common carotid artery. A 0.014-inch, high torque guidewire (Guidant; Guidant Europe S.A., Diegem, Belgium) was navigated through the stenosis into the distal internal carotid artery. A self-expandable stent (Carotid Wallstent, 7.0 × 30 mm; Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA) was deployed inside the stenosis. After stent delivery, the stent catheter was removed. With the guidewire maintained in the distal internal carotid artery, a balloon dilation catheter (Bypass Speedy, 20 mm in length, 5.0–6.0 mm in diameter; Boston Scientific Corporation) was navigated to the residual stenosis inside the stent and was inflated with 7–12 bar for 5 seconds. In all cases, the final angiogram demonstrated complete vessel restoration. No predilation was performed, and no distal protection device was used in any of the cases.

Duplex sonography of the extracranial carotid arteries and perivascular tissue and clinical examination was performed before and 4 hours ± 2, 24 hours ± 2, and 7 days ± 1 after SPAC. Duplex sonography was performed in axial and sagittal planes by using the Sonoline Elegra sonography system and a 7.5L40 linear-array 7.5-MHz transducer (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Sonographic criteria for carotid wall hematoma were: 1) an imaging appearance of a homogeneous, echolucent thickening of the vessel wall that was crescent-shaped and spindle-shaped in the axial and sagittal planes, respectively; and 2) its resolution during follow-up sonography. Sonographic evaluations were performed by physicians with explicit expertise in neurovascular sonography (M.R., U.S.). Since vascular stents are visualized by means of duplex sonography, the sonography investigators were not blinded to the side of the carotid intervention. Horner syndrome was assumed to be present in case of miosis with or without eyelid ptosis, as diagnosed by a physician who was blinded to the side of SPAC (W.-D.N.).

The study was approved by the local institutional review board. The Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis, and statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05.

Results

Before SPAC, none of the 28 patients had a carotid wall hematoma, as detected with sonography or an incidence of Horner syndrome. Within 24 hours ± 2 after SPAC, 11 of the 28 patients had developed ipsilateral Horner syndrome (patients 1–11, Table). Ten of these 11 patients had a sonographic appearance of a carotid wall hematoma (Fig 1), whereas only two of the 17 patients without Horner syndrome had this finding (Fisher exact test, P < .001). None of the 28 patients had carotid dissection outside of the stented portion of the vessel, as shown in any of the sonography investigations.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial (A) and sagittal (B) duplex sonograms obtained during tissue harmonic imaging of the left internal carotid artery after SPAC in a patient with postinterventional Horner syndrome. The crescent-shaped (A) and respective spindle-shaped (B), homogeneous, echolucent thickening of the vessel wall indicates a carotid wall hematoma.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of study patients and the postinterventional appearance of Horner syndrome and carotid wall hematoma

All cases of carotid wall hematoma and 10 of the 11 cases of Horner syndrome had developed within 4 hours ± 2 after SPAC. However, one of the patients with a carotid wall hematoma did not have Horner syndrome during the examination performed 4 hours ± 2 after SPAC; however, it was observed in the examination performed 24 hours ± after SPAC (patient 10, Table). In all patients, both carotid wall hematoma and Horner syndrome had resolved at 7 days ± 1 after SPAC.

The age of the patients with Horner syndrome and of those with carotid wall hematoma was not significantly different from that of the patients who did not develop Horner syndrome and of those without carotid wall hematoma, respectively (Mann-Whitney U Test).

Discussion

In this study, we found ipsilateral Horner syndrome after SPAC in 11 of 28 patients. Horner syndrome was significantly related to a postinterventional appearance of an ipsilateral carotid wall hematoma. In all patients, both Horner syndrome and carotid wall hematoma had resolved within 7 days ± 1 day. Thus, Horner syndrome appears to be a common yet transient event following SPAC. The rather small number of patients in this study, however, limits conclusions regarding the incidence of procedure-related complications.

Before we consider the pathophysiologic mechanisms of Horner syndrome during carotid interventions, we should highlight the sympathetic innervation of the eye. The sympathetic pathway to the eye consists of a three-neuron chain (2). The first-order neuron originates from the posterolateral hypothalamus and descends through the brain stem to reach the second-order neuron located in the intermediolateral cell column of the lower cervical and the upper thoracic cord (C8-T2). The second-order neuron leaves the cord with the spinal nerve roots and ascends along the cervical sympathetic chain to synapse with the third-order neuron located in the superior cervical ganglion. The postganglionic third-order neuron ascends to the cranium as part of the internal carotid plexus and innervates the dilator of the iris and the superior and inferior tarsal muscles. The fibers involved in facial sweating travel along the external carotid artery (2). Interruption of postganglionic sympathetic fibers along the carotid artery may result in ipsilateral oculosympathetic dysfunction with miosis and facultative eyelid ptosis (ie, Horner syndrome).

Horner syndrome is a common sign of spontaneous or traumatic carotid artery dissection (3–5), which poses a risk of ischemic injury to the brain (6, 7). Moreover, carotid dissection associated with Horner syndrome has been reported to complicate cerebrovascular interventions (eg, carotid endarterectomy, cerebral angiography, and carotid artery stent placement) (8–10). Therefore, in the event of Horner syndrome following SPAC, carotid dissection outside of the stented portion of the vessel must be ruled out immediately.

In this study, Horner syndrome following SPAC was significantly related to a postinterventional appearance of an ipsilateral carotid wall hematoma. This observation suggests that the hematoma itself may have caused sympathetic disturbance due to stretching or compression of periarterial sympathetic fibers traveling along the carotid artery. However, two of the 28 patients had a carotid wall hematoma without a sympathetic disturbance, and one of the 11 patients who developed Horner syndrome did not have an imaging appearance of a carotid wall hematoma. Thus, although a causal relation of Horner syndrome and carotid wall hematoma appears to be obvious, both Horner syndrome and carotid wall hematoma could independently result from mechanical stretch injury.

We used self-expandable stents and primary stent placement in all cases. With this technique, the stent is unfolded within the stenosis before angioplasty itself is performed; this process allows dilation of the residual stenosis during stent protection. Thus, potential dissections during and after balloon dilation are fixed to the vessel wall and prevented from obstructing the vessel (11).

A nonobstructive carotid wall hematoma may be diagnosed by means of MR imaging or sonography (12, 13). However, MR imaging cannot be used to visualize a wall hematoma after stent placement because of extensive stent artifacts. In contrast, sonography is not affected by the use of ferromagnetic material, and thus, it is suitable for an examination of stented vessels. Although data about the sonographic diagnosis of carotid wall hematoma with a normal carotid angiogram is limited, complete resolution of echolucent wall thickening within 7 days ± 1 after intervention allowed us to differentiate a wall hematoma from compressed plaque debris.

Conclusion

Horner syndrome appears to be a common yet transient event after SPAC. Although postinterventional Horner syndrome is significantly related to ipsilateral carotid wall hematoma, whether the formation of the hematoma itself is responsible for sympathetic disturbances remains unproven.

References

  1. ↵
    Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–1387
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Fields CR, Barker FM 2nd. Review of Horner’s syndrome and a case report. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:481–485
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Mokri B, Sundt TM Jr, Houser OW. Spontaneous internal carotid dissection, hemicrania, and Horner’s syndrome. Arch Neurol 1979;36:677–680
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. Leira EC, Bendixen BH, Kardon RH, Adams HP Jr. Brief, transient Horner’s syndrome can be the hallmark of a carotid artery dissection. Neurology 1998;50:289–290
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Chan CC, Paine M, O’Day J. Carotid dissection: a common cause of Horner’s syndrome. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;29:411–415
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Anson J, Crowell RM. Cervicocranial arterial dissection. Neurosurgery 1991;29:89–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Mokri B, Sundt TM Jr, Houser OW, Piepgras DG. Spontaneous dissection of the cervical internal carotid artery. Ann Neurol 1986;19:126–138
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Ringer AJ, Fessler RD, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Horner’s syndrome after carotid artery stenting: case report. Surg Neurol 2000;54:439–443
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. Cloft HJ, Jensen ME, Kallmes DF, Dion JE. Arterial dissections complicating cerebral angiography and cerebrovascular interventions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:541–545
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Perry C, James D, Wixon C, Mills J, Ericksen C. Horner’s syndrome after carotid endarterectomy: a case report. Vasc Surg 2001;35:325–327
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Koch C, Kucinski T, Eckert B, Wittkugel O, Röther J, Zeumer H. Endovaskuläre Behandlung hochgradiger Halsgefäβstenosen - Stentgestützte perkutane Angioplastie der Arteria Carotis ohne Protektion. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002;174:1506–1510
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    Fiebach J, Brandt T, Knauth M, Jansen O. MRT mit Fettsuppression zur Darstellung des Wandhämatoms bei spontaner Dissektion der A. carotis interna. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1999;171:290–293
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    Timpe L, Daffertshofer M, Gass A, Hennerici M. Stroke vignette: duplex ultrasound diagnosis of carotid/vertebral dissection without hemodynamically relevant stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:334
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received February 26, 2003.
  • Accepted after revision May 11, 2003.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 8
1 Sep 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Horner Syndrome Related to Ipsilateral Carotid Wall Hematoma after Stent Placement for the Treatment of Carotid Stenoses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Michael Rosenkranz, Bernd Eckert, Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Cornelius Weiller, Ulrich Sliwka
Horner Syndrome Related to Ipsilateral Carotid Wall Hematoma after Stent Placement for the Treatment of Carotid Stenoses
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2003, 24 (8) 1508-1511;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Horner Syndrome Related to Ipsilateral Carotid Wall Hematoma after Stent Placement for the Treatment of Carotid Stenoses
Michael Rosenkranz, Bernd Eckert, Wolf-Dirk Niesen, Cornelius Weiller, Ulrich Sliwka
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2003, 24 (8) 1508-1511;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Use of flow diverter stent for treatment of a cervical carotid artery dissection and pseudoaneurysm causing Horners syndrome
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Delayed Reperfusion Post-Thrombectomy&Thrombolysis
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire