Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

OtherBRAIN

MR Imaging Visualization of the Cerebral Microvasculature: A Comparison of Live and Postmortem Studies at 8 T

Roger A. Dashner, Donald W. Chakeres, Allahyar Kangarlu, Petra Schmalbrock, Gregory A. Christoforidis and Robert M. DePhilip
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2003, 24 (9) 1881-1884;
Roger A. Dashner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald W. Chakeres
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allahyar Kangarlu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Schmalbrock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory A. Christoforidis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. DePhilip
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: In this study, we compared 8-T gradient-echo MR images of the microvasculature in the live human brain with images of the unembalmed and embalmed postmortem brain. Small vessels were well visualized in the live brain and even better seen in the unembalmed postmortem brain, but they could not be visualized in the embalmed postmortem brain. These findings are important for direct comparisons of the microvasculature on 8-T MR images and on histologic sections.

Studies conducted with a whole-body 8-T MR imaging system have clearly demonstrated signal voids (<500 μm in diameter). These voids likely represent the leptomeningeal vasculature, the perforating cortical and medullary vessels, and other deep vessels of the in vivo brain (1–3). However, these observed signal voids have not yet been positively identified as arteries or veins, although some tentative identifications have been made on the basis of anatomic locations alone (1–3).

In this study, we generated images of the unembalmed and embalmed postmortem human brain in situ by using an 8-T MR unit and compared these images to others acquired in vivo. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the quality of the images obtainable from the cadaveric brain. We sought to determine if unembalmed or embalmed postmortem brain tissue is suitable for future correlative histologic studies designed to confirm that observed signal voids represent microscopic vessels and to positively distinguish the microscopic arteries and veins in the brain.

Technique

All images of the live and postmortem human brain were generated by using a console (Avance; Bruker, Billerica, MA) interfaced to an 8-T MR imaging unit with an 80-cm bore (Magnex; General Electric, Abingdon, UK). A 16-strut, modified, two-port, quadrature, transverse electromagnetic resonator radio-frequency (RF) coil was specifically tuned for each subject’s head before imaging was performed. Imaging of the live brain was conducted under institutional review board oversight and under a U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before the imaging study. Imaging of the postmortem brain was performed on a cadaver donated for scientific research.

The unembalmed brain of an 83-year-old male cadaver with no known neurologic disease was imaged in situ within 48 hours of death. A licensed embalmer subsequently embalmed this cadaver, and it was imaged again. High-resolution multisection gradient-echo (GE) images of the unembalmed and embalmed brain were acquired in situ. Pulse-sequence parameters for these images were as follows: TR/TE/NEX, 500–1000/6–17/1; approximate flip angle, 20°; FOV, 20 cm; matrix, 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 pixels; section thickness, 2–4 mm; receiver bandwidth, 50 kHz; and acquisition time, 5–17 minutes.

Closely matched GE images of the live brain were acquired from a 52-year-old male volunteer. These images were generated with the following pulse-sequence parameters: 500–1000/10–16/1, approximate flip angle, 20°; FOV, 20 cm; matrix, 512 × 512 or 1024 × 1024 pixels; section thickness, 2 mm; receiver bandwidth, 50 kHz; and acquisition time, 5–17 minutes.

Images of the live brain and the unembalmed and embalmed postmortem brain were compared for their general appearance and depiction of the microvasculature. In addition, images of the unembalmed cadaveric brain acquired by using short and longer TEs were compared.

Figure 1 shows the 8-T GE images of the brain obtained in vivo, along with the images of the unembalmed and embalmed postmortem brain obtained in situ. The relative signal-intensity characteristics of the gray matter and white matter of the live brain (Fig 1A) were similar to those of the unembalmed postmortem brain (Fig 1B) and the embalmed postmortem brain (Fig 1C). In each set of images, structures with higher water content produced higher signal intensity, such that CSF or formalin demonstrated the highest signal intensity, cerebral gray matter had intermediate intensity, and white matter exhibited lower signal intensity. The lowest signal intensity was observed in the iron-bearing nuclei of the brain.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial 8-T GE images of the corona radiata obtained above the lateral ventricles. Parameters used to image the live and postmortem brain were TR/TE, 1000/16; FOV, 20 cm; matrix, 1024 × 1024 pixels; and section thickness, 2 mm.

A, The live brain.

B, The unembalmed postmortem brain.

C, The embalmed postmortem brain.

D–F, The enlarged regions of the images shown in A (D), B (E), and C (F). Note that the leptomeningeal (LM) and intraparenchymal (IP) vessels are present on both sets of images obtained in live and unembalmed postmortem brain, whereas the perforating cortical (PC) vessels are seen only on images of the live brain. None of these vessels are easily differentiated on images of embalmed postmortem brain. Most leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal vessels appear hyperintense and are difficult to visualize when filled and surrounded by formalin.

The blood vessels on the images of the living and unembalmed postmortem brain were resolved as low-signal-intensity structures, and they appeared enlarged because of magnetic susceptibility effects. The larger leptomeningeal vessels, running on the surface of the cerebral cortex, were well depicted in both the live brain and the cadaveric brain. Relatively few intraparenchymal (medullary) vessels were detected in the corona radiata of the live brain (Fig 1D), whereas a large number of these vessels were visualized in the unembalmed postmortem brain (Fig 1E). In contrast, perforating cortical vessels were better seen in live brain. The leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal vessels were barely visible after embalming (Fig 1F). Several superficial vessels of the scalp with intermediate signal intensities were visible in the live individual, whereas none of these vessels could be seen in the postmortem subject.

On images of the live and unembalmed postmortem brain, the dural sinuses were filled with blood and exhibited low signal intensity, whereas in the embalmed postmortem brain, these sinuses were filled with formalin and demonstrated high signal intensity. Overall, contrast between the gray matter and white matter decreased after embalming, and the images lacked the sharpness demonstrated on the images of the live and unembalmed postmortem brain.

Figure 2 shows GE images of the unembalmed postmortem brain acquired by using short (6 msec) and longer (17 msec) TEs. Images generated by using a shorter TE displayed lower contrast between structures in the gray matter and white matter (Fig 2A and C). Lengthening the TE enhanced the T2* contrast, which improved the overall contrast of the images (Fig 2B and D) and also allowed better visualization of the vasculature and perivascular spaces surrounding the blood vessels. Larger magnetic susceptibility effects were apparent on the images acquired with a longer TE, which enhanced the visibility of the blood vessels. The contrast between the iron-bearing regions of the basal ganglia and midbrain (caudate nuclei, putamen, globus pallidus, substantia nigra, red nuclei) and the remaining brain (thalamus, internal capsule, corpus callosum) increased with increasing TE. Near the air-tissue interfaces, susceptibility-based artifacts due to signal intensity loss were more severe on the images generated with a longer TE.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Axial 8-T images of the basal ganglia (A and B) and midbrain (C and D) acquired from the same unembalmed postmortem brain by using GE pulse sequences with shorter (A and C) and longer (B and D) TEs. Parameters for A and C were 750/6; FOV, 20 cm; matrix, 512 × 512 pixels; and section thickness, 4 mm. Parameters for B and D were 750/17; FOV, 20 cm; matrix, 512 × 512 pixels; and section thickness, 4 mm. Note improvements in the gray matter–white matter contrast and the visibility of the perivascular spaces (PS) with the longer TE. The vasculature is better seen on the GE images acquired with a longer TE because of the increased susceptibility effects surrounding vessels, such as the septal vein (SV) and the cerebral vessels (CV).

Discussion

The 8-T GE images of the unembalmed postmortem brain in situ demonstrated signal intensities similar, although not identical, to those of the brain in vivo (Fig 1). Previous imaging studies conducted at lower field strengths have also demonstrated similarities in signal-intensity characteristics between the unembalmed postmortem brain in situ and the live brain (4, 5). Because signal intensities are largely related to differences in the water concentration within the brain and because water concentrations are assumed to be similar in the living and recently deceased brain, these findings could be anticipated.

Quantitative comparisons of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) are not trivial on high-field-strength images. The difficulty in reporting SNR and CNR data for 8-T MR imaging is that these values substantially vary across an image and between sections. This variation occurs because RF magnetic-field inhomogeneity leads to spatially variable flip angles and receiver sensitivity (6); therefore, the SNR and the CNR have to be described as a function of local flip angles and receiver sensitivity. For these reasons, we did not attempt to make direct quantitative comparisons of the SNR and the CNR on images of the live and postmortem brain.

With GE imaging of the living brain, visualization of blood vessels is largely dependent on blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast and the sensitivity of GE imaging to local field inhomogeneities (7, 8). This susceptibility-based BOLD contrast is observed when diamagnetic oxyhemoglobin loses its oxygen and becomes paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin. This deoxyhemoglobin acts as an endogenous contrast agent in the red blood cells and causes T2* shortening and inhomogeneous field gradients inside and around blood vessels (9). The actual observed effect, due to the presence of deoxyhemoglobin, is a dramatic loss in signal intensity (T2* shortening), which increases with increasing magnetic field strength (10, 11). Geometric distortions surrounding vessel lumina, due to the presence of paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin, have been observed in previous studies (1, 3, 10), as well as our own.

We found that vessels in the brain were remarkably well resolved at 8 T. The number of microscopic leptomeningeal and intraparenchymal vessels visible on images of the unembalmed postmortem brain was much higher than on images of the live brain. Furthermore, these vessels were more clearly seen on the images of the cadaveric brain than on images of the living subject (Fig 1). Increases in deoxyhemoglobin concentration in postmortem vessels may be assumed to further shorten T2* relaxation times, improving vessel contrast in cadaveric studies. In addition, a lack of blood flow after death may be another reason for the improved vascular contrast.

In vivo, the signal intensity of vessels is the result of a complex interplay between time-of-flight (TOF) inflow effects, which increase the signal intensity, and BOLD effects, which decrease the signal intensity. In addition, spin motion in the susceptibility field produced by deoxyhemoglobin may lead to additional dephasing and loss of signal intensity. Intracranial veins always have low signal intensity, suggesting that the BOLD effect dominates the appearance of these vessels. However at 8 T, intracranial arteries generally do not show the high signal intensity TOF effect usually observed at lower field strengths. Presumably, a combination of TOF enhancement, a decrease in the BOLD signal intensity, and dephasing effects render these vessels nearly isointense to the surrounding brain tissue. Even with a TE as short as 3 ms, TOF enhancements are limited, and only a few arteries are seen (12). The fact that superficial scalp vessels have intermediate signal intensity may suggest a different oxygenation level or different dephasing effects due to the flow velocity.

As the TE increased, the conspicuity of the vessels in the brain increased as well (Fig 2). This observation supports earlier research demonstrating an improvement in vascular contrast with the application of a longer TE (7). This increase in TE led to larger magnetic susceptibly effects, which formed parallel bands of high and low signal intensity around the vessels.

After embalming, nearly all of the small blood vessels in the brain that were visible as hypointense voids on the GE images of the unembalmed brain disappeared. This disappearance was due to the replacement of blood in the vessel lumina with formalin (Fig 1). Because of the presence of the formalin within and also surrounding their lumina, these vessels demonstrated high signal intensity that was barely distinguishable within the parenchyma and subarachnoid space of the brain. This observation further confirms the finding that the signal voids on GE images of the unembalmed postmortem brain were related to the paramagnetic properties of the blood constituents and that they were not due to some other property of the vessels themselves.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that 8-T MR imaging of the unembalmed postmortem human brain in situ can produce images similar to those acquired from the brain of a living subject at the same field strength. Much of the vasculature is better visualized on GE images of the unembalmed postmortem brain in situ than on GE images of the brain in vivo because of the universal presence of deoxyhemoglobin in the blood vessels of the recently deceased brain. Vessels are poorly visualized on images of the embalmed postmortem brain. This observation indicated that embalmed specimens are unsuitable for use in evaluating the microvasculature. Imaging the unembalmed postmortem brain by using GE pulse sequences may be suitable for future correlative studies aimed at distinguishing microscopic arteries from veins.

Acknowledgments

We thank Donald P. Kincaid, BS, LE, LFD, for preparing and embalming the cadaver used in this study. We also acknowledge Ryan D. Gilbert, BS, EET, for providing technical assistance in our experiments. In addition, we thank Chastity D. S. Whitaker, BS, for assisting in acquiring and processing the data used in this study.

References

  1. ↵
    Burgess RE, Yu Y, Christoforidis GA, et al. Human leptomeningeal and cortical vascular anatomy of the cerebral cortex at 8 Tesla. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:850–856
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. Christoforidis GA, Bourekas EC, Baujan M, et al. High resolution MRI of the deep brain vascular anatomy at 8 tesla: susceptibility-based enhancement of the venous structures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:857–866
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Abduljalil AM, Robitaille PML. Macroscopic susceptibility in ultra high field MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:832–841
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Blamire AM, Rowe JG, Styles P, McDonald B. Optimising imaging parameters for post mortem MR imaging of the human brain. Acta Radiologica 1999;40:593–597
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Boyko OB, Alston SR, Fuller GN, Hulette CM, Johnson GA, Burger PC. Utility of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in clinical neuropathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:219–225
    PubMed
  6. ↵
    Ibrahim TS, Abduljalil AM, Baertlein BA, Lee R, Robitaille P-ML. Analysis of B1 field profiles and SAR values for multi-strut transverse electromagnetic RF coils in high field MRI applications. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:2545–2555
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:68–78
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Ogawa S, Lee TM. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: in vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:9–18
    PubMed
  9. ↵
    Lee SP, Silva AC, Ugurbil K, Kim SG. Diffusion-weighted spin-echo fMRI at 9.4 T: microvascular/tissue contribution to BOLD signal changes. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:919–928
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Thulborn KR, Waterton JC, Matthews PM, Radda GK. Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982;714:265–270
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Gati JS, Menon RS, Ugurbil K, Rutt BK. Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:296–302
    PubMed
  12. ↵
    Schmalbrock P, Abduljalil AM, Truong TK. TOF and BOLD 3D gradient echo imaging of cerebral vasculature at 8T. Presented at: 10th Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine;2002; Honolulu, HI
  • Received December 6, 2002.
  • Accepted after revision March 31, 2003.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 24 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 24, Issue 9
1 Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Imaging Visualization of the Cerebral Microvasculature: A Comparison of Live and Postmortem Studies at 8 T
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Roger A. Dashner, Donald W. Chakeres, Allahyar Kangarlu, Petra Schmalbrock, Gregory A. Christoforidis, Robert M. DePhilip
MR Imaging Visualization of the Cerebral Microvasculature: A Comparison of Live and Postmortem Studies at 8 T
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2003, 24 (9) 1881-1884;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Imaging Visualization of the Cerebral Microvasculature: A Comparison of Live and Postmortem Studies at 8 T
Roger A. Dashner, Donald W. Chakeres, Allahyar Kangarlu, Petra Schmalbrock, Gregory A. Christoforidis, Robert M. DePhilip
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2003, 24 (9) 1881-1884;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Technique
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire