Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Multiparametric Iterative Self-Organizing MR Imaging Data Analysis Technique for Assessment of Tissue Viability in Acute Cerebral Ischemia

Panayiotis D. Mitsias, James R. Ewing, Mei Lu, Mohammed M. Khalighi, Mamatha Pasnoor, Hassan B. Ebadian, Qingming Zhao, Sunitha Santhakumar, Michael A. Jacobs, Nikolaos Papamitsakis, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh, David Hearshen, Suresh C. Patel and Michael Chopp
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2004, 25 (9) 1499-1508;
Panayiotis D. Mitsias
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Ewing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mei Lu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed M. Khalighi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mamatha Pasnoor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hassan B. Ebadian
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qingming Zhao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunitha Santhakumar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Jacobs
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikolaos Papamitsakis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Hearshen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suresh C. Patel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Chopp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Standardized ISODATA image reveals a right hemispheric ischemic lesion. The ischemic lesion is inhomogeneous and contains two different tissue signatures (4 and 5). The MR imaging study was performed 12 hours after symptom onset.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Calculation of tissue recovery based on acute phase ISODATA image and outcome-phase T2-weighted image.

    A, Acute phase ISODATA image.

    B, Acute phase diffusion-weighted image.

    C, Outcome (3-month) phase T2-weighted image.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    Distribution of MR Imaging Parameters during the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke

    MR Imaging Parameter (No. of Tissues)Total n = 200 (%)rt-PA Treatment n = 49 (%)No rt-PA Treatment n = 151 (%)P Value*
    Signature number
        <343 (21.5)10 (4.5)33 (17.0)
        471 (35.5)21 (10.5)50 (25.0)
        557 (28.5)10 (5)47 (23.5)
        ≥629 (14.5)8 (4)21 (13.82)0.49
    rADC
        Median0.780.790.770.91
        (2nd, 3rd QL)(0.66, 0.91)(0.68, 0.90)(0.65, 0.92)
    rT2
        Median181.191.170.20
        (2nd, 3rd QL)(1.09, 1.33)(1.10, 1.34)(1.10, 1.25)
    ADC
        Median609.8 μm2/s620.4 μm2/s608.3 μm2/s0.79
        (2nd, 3rd QL)(513.8, 694.6)(548.5, 675.4)(497.1, 707.5)
    T2
        Median85.181.086.20.04
        (2nd, 3rd QL)(78.0, 97.6)(76.7, 89.3)(78.1, 98.9)
    Stroke onset to MR imaging time
        Median9.47.99.80.24
        (2nd, 3rd QL)(7.8, 11.8)(5.6, 12.0)(8.8, 11.0)
    • Note.—rt-PA indicates recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; rT2, relative T2; QL, quartile; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.

    • * Comparison between rt-PA-treated and non-rt-PA-treated groups using the generalized estimation equations approach considering the correlation among sections and among tissues.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    Association of Acute Phase MR Imaging Parameters with Outcome of ≥20% Recovery at 3 Months: Individual Parameter Effect

    VariableOdds Ratio (95% CI)*P Value*Odds Ratio (95% CI)†P Value†
    Tissue signature––2.40 (0.98, 5.89)0.06
    rADC36.41 (4.92, 269.19)<0.010.09 (0.002, 4.07)0.18
    rT20.06 (0.01, 0.28)<0.010.93 (0.05, 18.35)0.94
    ADC1.005 (1.003, 1.007)<0.011.001 (0.99, 1.006)0.86
    T20.99 (0.97, 1.011)0.290.97 (0.93, 1.02)0.24
    Stroke onset to MR imaging time0.97 (0.92, 1.01)0.130.97 (0.92, 1.12)0.75
    rt-PA treatment1.51 (0.61, 3.75)0.37––
    • Note.—CI indicates confidence interval; –, invalid test; rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; rT2, relative T2, ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

    • * Testing for individual MR image parameter effect or the interaction of MR imaging parameter by rt-PA treatment effect adjusting for acute phase lesion size volume and correlation among sections and among tissues.

    • † Testing the rt-PA by MR imaging parameter interaction.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3:

    Effects of Tissue Signature Value, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value, and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment on Outcome of ≥20% Recovery of Ischemic Lesion at 3 Months: Demonstration of Three-Way Interaction among These Individual Factors Regarding Eventual Recovery in Comparison with the Reference Groups

    Recovery # (N) %Odds Ratio (95% CI)Odds Ratio (95% CI)
    rt-PASignaturerADC (Med)
    No>4<0.7911 (45) 0.24MLTR group0.12 (0.03, 0.47)*
    ≥0.7914 (23) 0.614.27 (1.52, 11.99)*0.51 (0.11, 2.3)
    ≤4<0.7922 (33) 0.676.75 (2.6, 17.51)*0.81 (0.2, 3.2)
    ≥0.7940 (50) 0.8012.67 (4.4, 36.44)*1.51 (0.35, 6.45)
    Yes>4<0.797 (10) 0.706.82 (1.84, 25.31)*0.81 (0.23, 2.86)
    ≥0.796 (8) 0.755.5 (0.87, 34.55)0.66 (0.09, 5.02)
    ≤4<0.797 (12) 0.585.65 (1.56, 20.54)*0.68 (0.23, 1.97)
    ≥0.7914 (19) 0.748.37 (2.12, 33.02)*LLTR group
    ADC (Med)
    No>4<609 μm2/s11 (46) 0.24MLTR group0.13 (0.03, 0.52)*
    ≥609 μm2/s14 (22) 0.644.22 (1.65, 10.79)*0.57 (0.14, 2.31)
    ≤4<609 μm2/s22 (30) 0.739.31 (2.8, 30.99)*1.26 (0.29, 5.5)
    ≥609 μm2/s40 (53) 0.759.09 (3.33, 24.83)*1.23 (0.3, 4.94)
    Yes>4<609 μm2/s7 (9) 0.7810.18 (1.91, 54.34)*1.37 (0.28, 6.72)
    ≥609 μm2/s6 (9) 0.673.73 (0.71, 19.65)0.5 (0.08, 3.27)
    ≤4<609 μm2/s9 (14) 0.646.27 (1.47, 26.74)*0.84 (0.24, 2.99)
    ≥609 μm2/s12 (17) 0.717.42 (1.92, 28.64)*LLTR group
    • Note.—rt-PA indicates recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; Med, median; Reference, reference group.

    • * P < .05 compared with the reference group using the generalized estimation equations approach considering the correlation among sections and among tissues.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4:

    Subgroup Analysis for Untreated Patients Only, Indicating the Effects of Tissue Signature Value, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value, and Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Treatment on Tissue Outcome, in Comparison with the Most Likely to Recover and Least Likely to Recover Reference Groups

    Recovery # (N) %Odds Ratio (95% CI)Odds Ratio (95% CI)
    rt-PATissue SignaturerADC (Med)
    No≤3, 4<0.7922 (33) 0.670.65 (0.32, 1.35)3.5 (1.24, 9.87)*
    ≥0.7940 (50) 0.80MLTR group6 (1.84, 19.58)*
    =5<0.799 (29) 0.310.12 (0.05, 0.30)*0.7 (0.33, 1.49)
    ≥0.7911 (18) 0.610.42 (0.13, 1.29)1.95 (0.61, 6.22)
    ≥6<0.792 (16) 0.130.04 (0.01, 0.18)*LLTR group
    ≥0.793 (5) 0.600.37 (0.05, 2.90)1.55 (0.21, 11.46)
    SignaturesrADC (1st QL)
    No≤3, 4<0.6611 (13) 0.852.99 (0.57, 15.73)70.65 (8.93, 558.74)*
    ≥0.6651 (70) 0.73MLTR group23.64 (6.62, 84.41)*
    =5<0.665 (17) 0.290.12 (0.04, 0.39)*2.92 (0.99, 8.6)
    ≥0.6615 (30) 0.500.35 (0.14, 0.89)*8.28 (2.28, 30.04)*
    ≥6<0.661 (10) 0.100.04 (0.01, 0.15)*LLTR group
    ≥0.664 (11) 0.360.21 (0.05, 0.85)*4.88 (1.11, 21.47)*
    • Note.—CI indicates confidence interval; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rADC, relative apparent diffusion coefficient; Med, median; QL, quartile; Reference, reference group.

    • * P < .05 compared with the reference group using the generalized estimation equations approach considering the correlation among sections and among tissues.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 9
1 Oct 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multiparametric Iterative Self-Organizing MR Imaging Data Analysis Technique for Assessment of Tissue Viability in Acute Cerebral Ischemia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Panayiotis D. Mitsias, James R. Ewing, Mei Lu, Mohammed M. Khalighi, Mamatha Pasnoor, Hassan B. Ebadian, Qingming Zhao, Sunitha Santhakumar, Michael A. Jacobs, Nikolaos Papamitsakis, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh, David Hearshen, Suresh C. Patel, Michael Chopp
Multiparametric Iterative Self-Organizing MR Imaging Data Analysis Technique for Assessment of Tissue Viability in Acute Cerebral Ischemia
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1499-1508;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Multiparametric Iterative Self-Organizing MR Imaging Data Analysis Technique for Assessment of Tissue Viability in Acute Cerebral Ischemia
Panayiotis D. Mitsias, James R. Ewing, Mei Lu, Mohammed M. Khalighi, Mamatha Pasnoor, Hassan B. Ebadian, Qingming Zhao, Sunitha Santhakumar, Michael A. Jacobs, Nikolaos Papamitsakis, Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh, David Hearshen, Suresh C. Patel, Michael Chopp
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1499-1508;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Does Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Represent the Ischemic Core? An Evidence-Based Systematic Review
  • The technology of MRI -- the next 10 years?
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire