Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Characterization of a First-Pass Gradient-Echo Spin-Echo Method to Predict Brain Tumor Grade and Angiogenesis

Kathleen M. Schmainda, Scott D. Rand, Allen M. Joseph, Rebecca Lund, B. Doug Ward, Arvind P. Pathak, John L. Ulmer, Michael A. Baddrudoja and Hendrikus G. J. Krouwer
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2004, 25 (9) 1524-1532;
Kathleen M. Schmainda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott D. Rand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen M. Joseph
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Lund
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Doug Ward
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arvind P. Pathak
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Ulmer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Baddrudoja
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hendrikus G. J. Krouwer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Sample SE rCBV map shows hot-spot ROIs (black outlines and arrows), which represent the highest approximate 10–20% of microvascular rCBVs. These were used to mask the image maps and perform hot-spot analysis.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images (a and e) GE rCBV maps (b and f), SE rCBV maps (c and g), and ratio maps (d and h) obtained in a 53-year-old man with an anaplastic oligodendroglioma (a–d) and a 55-year-old man with a glioblastoma multiforme (e–h).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Whole-tumor ROI analysis for gliomas.

    A, GE rCBV, which is sensitive to total blood volume, is significantly correlated with tumor grade (n = 72).

    B, Conversely, SE rCBV, which is sensitive to microvascular blood volume, is not significantly correlated with tumor grade (n = 67).

    C, ΔR2*/ΔR2 ratio, an index of mVD, is significantly correlated with tumor grade (n = 67).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Microvascular hot-spot ROI analysis for gliomas.

    A, GE rCBV results maintain a significant correlation (n = 67).

    B, Contrary to whole-tumor results, SE rCBV shows a significant correlation with tumor grade (n = 67).

    C, While a significant correlation with tumor grade is retained, the correlation is weaker than that of whole-tumor ROIs (n = 67).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    SE rCBV data as a function of GE rCBV data. The K nearest-neighbor analysis (K = 5) resulted in correct classification of five (69%) of 16 grade I–II tumors (circles) and 49 (95%) of 51 grade III–IV tumors (squares). Asterisk indicates misclassified data points; the arrows indicate two low-grade tumors where diagnosis was based on biopsy.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    MRI-derived (a) post-contrast (b) GE rCBV, (c) SE rCBV and (d) ratio maps obtained in a 66-year-old female patient prior to CT-guided biopsy. The biopsy pathologic results suggest low-grade astrocytoma. This diagnosis is not consistent with either the rCBV results or the clinical course of this patient.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Patient histology and imaging results

    Patient/Age (y)/SexPathologic Diagnosis
    1/80/MEpendymoma grade II
    2/40/FAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III*
    3/50/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    4/32/FAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    5/52/FRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    6/73/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    7/45/FAnaplastic oligodendroglioma grade IV
    8/37/FAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    9/66/MMixed glioblastoma multiforme and low-grade astrocytoma
    10/69/MAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    11/47/MAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    12/48/FAstrocytoma II, with markers of glioblastoma multiforme
    13/48/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    14/68/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    15/50/FRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    16/50/MLow-grade glioma grade II*
    17/77/MAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    18/41/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    19/59/MOligodendroglioma
    20/23/FRecurrent central neurocytoma
    21/50/MRecurrent anaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    22/42/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    23/74/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    24/39/MOligodendroglioma grade II
    25/49/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    26/50/MAstrocytoma grade II*
    27/71/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    28/30/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    29/41/MMalignant oligodendroglioma grade III
    30/53/MAstrocytoma grade II
    31/41/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    32/65/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    33/42/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    34/66/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    35/41/MAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    36/56/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    37/77/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    38/66/FAstrocytoma grade II*
    39/30/MMixed glioma: astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma
    40/55/MAnaplastic oligodendroglioma grade III
    41/54/FRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    42/45/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    43/19/MAstrocytoma grade II
    44/55/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    45/40/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    46/78/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    47/54/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    48/46/FMixed anaplastic astrocytoma
    49/43/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    50/45/FRecurrent malignant mixed glioma
    51/32/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    52/42/MRecurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    53/40/MMixed gliomas: mostly oligodendroglioma, some astrocytoma
    54/25/FAstrocytoma grade II
    55/33/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    56/41/MGlioma grade II
    57/34/FOligodendroglioma grade II
    58/52/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    59/68/MAnaplastic astrocytoma
    60/44/FAnaplastic astrocytoma
    61/56/FAnaplastic astrocytoma
    62/42/MAnaplastic astrocytoma grade III
    63/64/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    64/28/MAnaplastic astrocytoma
    65/23/MGiant cell astrocytoma grade I
    66/40/FAnaplastic astrocytoma
    67/36/MAnaplastic astrocytoma
    68/53/MRecurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma
    69/62/MGlioblastoma multiforme
    70/68/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    71/52/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    72/52/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    73/54/FGlioblastoma multiforme
    • * Pathologic diagnosis was based on tissue biopsy.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 25 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 25, Issue 9
1 Oct 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of a First-Pass Gradient-Echo Spin-Echo Method to Predict Brain Tumor Grade and Angiogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Kathleen M. Schmainda, Scott D. Rand, Allen M. Joseph, Rebecca Lund, B. Doug Ward, Arvind P. Pathak, John L. Ulmer, Michael A. Baddrudoja, Hendrikus G. J. Krouwer
Characterization of a First-Pass Gradient-Echo Spin-Echo Method to Predict Brain Tumor Grade and Angiogenesis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1524-1532;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Characterization of a First-Pass Gradient-Echo Spin-Echo Method to Predict Brain Tumor Grade and Angiogenesis
Kathleen M. Schmainda, Scott D. Rand, Allen M. Joseph, Rebecca Lund, B. Doug Ward, Arvind P. Pathak, John L. Ulmer, Michael A. Baddrudoja, Hendrikus G. J. Krouwer
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2004, 25 (9) 1524-1532;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low-Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors
  • Optimization of Acquisition and Analysis Methods for Clinical Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Using a Population-Based Digital Reference Object
  • Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project
  • Impact of Software Modeling on the Accuracy of Perfusion MRI in Glioma
  • ASFNR Recommendations for Clinical Performance of MR Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of the Brain
  • Differentiation between Oligodendroglioma Genotypes Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion-Weighted Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopy
  • The Effect of Pulse Sequence Parameters and Contrast Agent Dose on Percentage Signal Recovery in DSC-MRI: Implications for Clinical Applications
  • Semi-automated and automated glioma grading using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI relative cerebral blood volume measurements
  • The Role of Preload and Leakage Correction in Gadolinium-Based Cerebral Blood Volume Estimation Determined by Comparison with MION as a Criterion Standard
  • Correlations between Perfusion MR Imaging Cerebral Blood Volume, Microvessel Quantification, and Clinical Outcome Using Stereotactic Analysis in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma
  • Recent advances in imaging epilepsy
  • Acquisition of MR perfusion images and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in acute ischaemic stroke patients: which procedure should be done first?
  • Magnetic Resonance As a Cancer Imaging Biomarker
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire