Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

Reference Values for Long Echo Time MR Spectroscopy in Healthy Adults

Yair Safriel, MarlyAnne Pol-Rodriguez, Edward J. Novotny, Douglas L. Rothman and Robert K. Fulbright
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2005, 26 (6) 1439-1445;
Yair Safriel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MarlyAnne Pol-Rodriguez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward J. Novotny
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas L. Rothman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert K. Fulbright
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a lack of information with regard to normal metabolic ratios acquired with MR spectroscopy utilizing a long echo time technique. Our purpose was to measure metabolic ratios in healthy adults to determine whether the metabolites varied across brain regions and by sex.

METHODS: Single voxel proton spectra were acquired with an echo time of 135 milliseconds in 10 brain regions of 72 healthy subjects ranging in age from 20 to 44 years. Six gray matter sites in the cerebrum included four cortical areas in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes, and two deep nuclear sites in the basal ganglia and the thalamus. Two subcortical white matter regions were in the parietal and the frontal lobes. Two posterior fossa sites included the pons and the cerebellum. All 10 brain regions were not studied in each subject. For each spectrum, the metabolites n-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), and choline (Ch) were identified and ratios of NAA/Cr and Ch/Cr calculated for each brain region. A multifactorial analysis of variance was performed with the two metabolic ratios as dependent variables and with brain region and sex as independent variables. Post hoc statistical analysis consisted of the Scheffé F statistic for significant difference between pairs of brain regions for both metabolic ratios.

RESULTS: There was significant regional variation for both the NAA/Cr ratio (P < .0001) and the Ch/Cr ratio (P < .0001). The NAA/Cr ratio was consistent within cortical gray and white matter but differed between cortical gray (smaller ratio) and white matter (larger ratio). The Ch/Cr ratio was variable in the gray matter, differed between some but not all gray and white matter regions, but was consistent within subcortical white matter regions. There was no difference between men and women for either metabolic ratio.

CONCLUSION: There was variation of the NAA/Cr ratio and the Ch/Cr ratio across brain regions, but no sex differences were found. These findings provide the requisite normative values to use single voxel, long-echo-time MR spectroscopy in adult patients with neurologic disorders.

MR spectroscopy is used clinically to measure brain metabolites in a variety of disorders, including neoplasms, metabolic diseases, inflammatory processes, and infections (1–4). To be accepted as a diagnostic test, it is essential to define a range of normal values against which disease will be judged, as is the case for most laboratory tests. In clinical applications of MR spectroscopy, the ratios of the various metabolites are used more often than absolute metabolite concentrations (1–3). Commonly used metabolic ratios include the ratio of n-acetylacetate asparte to creatine (NAA/Cr) and the ratio of choline to creatine (Ch/Cr). In many cases, MR spectra are obtained from affected brain tissue and contralateral unaffected tissue, because a normal reference data base may not be available. Earlier studies that defined normal metabolite values either used short echo times or studied actual metabolite concentration in a limited number of brain areas (5–12). Current clinical applications of MR spectroscopy, however, routinely include spectra obtained with long echo times (TE) in a variety of different brain regions, therefore by using normal volunteers, we set out to define a range of normal NAA/Cr and Ch/Cr ratios for both sexes in a number of brain areas by using long TE MR spectroscopy. We hypothesized that both the NAA/Cr ratio and Ch/Cr ratio would differ across brain regions.

Methods

Seventy-two healthy subjects (32 men and 40 women) participated in this study. Subjects ranged in age from 22 to 44 years. Mean age was 27 years (±6 years). Subjects were recruited from the university or medical center by word of mouth and e-mail. All subjects had attended college or were in college. Subjects filled out a questionnaire regarding past medical and surgical history. All subjects gave written informed consent, and the research was approved by the institutional review board. Exclusion criteria included claustrophobia, pregnancy, history of serious medical or neurologic illness, and failure to fulfill the safety criteria for patients undergoing MR imaging.

MR studies were performed on a 1.5-T MR imaging system. Subjects lay supine in the magnet with their heads immobilized by a neck support, foam wedges, and a restraining band drawn around the forehead. Scout images in the sagittal plane were acquired with parameters of 500/11 (TR/TE), a field of view of 24 cm, an imaging matrix of 256 × 192, and 5-mm contiguous sections. Axial T2-weighted images were acquired through the entire brain by using a fast spin-echo sequence with parameters of 3,000/80 (TR/TE), a field of view of 22 cm, an imaging matrix of 256 × 192, an echo train length of 16, and 3-mm contiguous sections.

On the basis of the T2-weighted images, voxels in 10 regions of the brain were chosen for MR spectroscopy spectra (see below). Voxels were 2 × 2 × 2 cm or 2 × 2 × 1.5 cm in size. The spectra were acquired by using a point-resolved 1H spectroscopy (PRESS) technique. After the transmitter and receiver were automatically adjusted, water signal intensity was automatically shimmed to within a line width of 3–5 Hz. The parameters for MR spectroscopy were 2,000/135 (TR/TE), a field of view of 22 × 22 cm, an imaging matrix of 256 × 192, 128 total scans, and scan time of 4 minutes 56 seconds. All data processing was performed by software provided by the manufacturer. Spectral processing included zero-filling, Gaussian apodization, Fourier transformation, water reference processing, frequency shift correction, and phase and baseline correction. By using the curve-fitting software provide by the manufacturer, peak integral values were determined. NAA was assigned at 2.02 parts per million (ppm), Ch at 3.2 ppm, and Cr at 3.03 ppm. The peak areas of NAA and Ch were normalized with respect to Cr. The integral value of each peak was dimensionless and represented relative measurement of the amount of each metabolite. The ratios of NAA to Cr and Ch to Cr were calculated. Spectra and integral values were displayed next to an anatomic T2-weighted image on which a square box was overlaid to indicate the anatomic location of each voxel from which the spectra was obtained.

In the examination time available, each of the 10 brain regions could not be studied in each subject, so spectra from three or four regions were sampled in three different subject groups. In group 1, spectra were collected from three brain regions of 22 subjects (10 men and 12 women): the occipital lobe gray matter, which included aspects of the cuneus, lingual gyrus and calcarine fissure; the lentiform nuclei (basal ganglia); and the posterior white matter (primarily the subcortical white matter in the parietal lobe). In group 2, spectra were collected from the frontal gray matter (superior frontal gyri), frontal white matter (subcortical white matter bordering superior and middle frontal gyri), and pons of 31 subjects (12 men and 19 women). Spectra were also collected from the temporal gray matter (primary auditory cortex in posterior aspect of the superior temporal gyrus) of 15 group 2 subjects. In group 3, spectra were collected from the thalamus, cerebellar hemisphere, and parietal gray matter (middle aspect of the intraparietal sulcus) of 20 subjects (10 men and 10 women). As in group 2, spectra were also collected from the temporal gray matter of 13 group 3 subjects. Figure 1 illustrates the four different brain regions and their corresponding spectra.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Single voxel PRESS proton MR spectra (TR/TE = 2000/135) demonstrate choline (Ch), creatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) peaks from occipital gray matter (A), posterior white matter (B), thalamus (C), and pons (D). The axial T2 FSE image shows the voxel location for the acquired spectrum. The chemical shift scale is in parts per million relative to tetramethylsilane.

An analysis of variance with age as the dependent variable and group as a factor demonstrated no significant difference between the mean ages of the three subject groups (F [2, 64] = 0.95; P = .4). The mean ages were 29, 27, and 27 years. An omnibus multifactorial analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed that collapsed across the three groups and examined the two metabolite ratios as the dependent measures and brain region (all 10 regions) and sex as independent variables, or factors. Post hoc analysis consisted of the Scheffé F statistic for any significant difference between pairs of brain regions for both the NAA/Cr ratio and the Ch/Cr ratio. To guard against the possibility that significant effects or interactions of brain region and sex could result from differences in variance among the three groups of subjects, a separate MANOVA was performed for each of the three subject groups with the metabolic ratios of NAA/Cr and Ch/Cr as the dependent variables and with brain region and sex as factors. Post hoc analysis again consisted of the Scheffé F statistic for significant differences between pairs of brain regions for both NAA/Cr and Ch/Cr (13).

Results

The omnibus MANOVA for the NAA/Cr ratio collapsed across the three groups and 10 brain regions revealed a main effect of brain region (F[9, 213] = 27; P < .0001), which indicates regional variation for the NAA/Cr ratio. There was no main effect of sex (F[1, 213] = 0.123; P = .73) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[9, 213] = 0.614; P = .78). Table 1 lists the mean NAA/Cr ratio and standard deviation (SD) for the 10 brain regions, collapsed across sex. The omnibus MANOVA for the Ch/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[9, 213] = 85; P < .0001), which again indicates regional variation of Ch/Cr. There was no effect of sex (F[1, 213] = 1.26; P = .26) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[9, 213] = 0.742; P = .67). Table 2 shows the mean Ch/Cr ratio and SD for the 10 brain regions, collapsed across sex. Figure 1 illustrates the MR spectra obtained from different brain regions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1:

Mean NAA/Cr ratio in 10 brain regions

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2:

Mean Ch/Cr ratio in 10 brain regions

The main effect of brain region and lack of an effect of sex were confirmed with the additional MANOVAs calculated separately for each of the three subject groups. The MANOVA for group 1 (basal ganglia, occipital gray matter, and posterior white matter) for the NAA/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[2, 56] = 30; P < .0001) but no effect of sex (F [1, 56] = 2.384; P = .13) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[2, 56] = 0.87; P = .42). Results for the Ch/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[2, 56] = 74; P < .0001) but no effect of sex (F[1, 56] = 1.3; P = .25), and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[2, 56] = 0.027; P = .97).

The separate MANOVA for group 2 (frontal gray matter, frontal white matter, temporal gray matter, and pons) for the NAA/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[3, 90] = 25; P < .0001) but no effect of sex (F[1, 90] = 0.109; P = .74) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[3, 90] = 0.165; P = .92). Results for the Ch/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[2, 56] = 74; P < .0001) but no effect of sex (F[1, 56] = 1.3; P = .25) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[2, 56] = 0.027; P = .97).

The separate MANOVA for group 3 (parietal gray matter, temporal gray matter, thalamus, and cerebellum) for the NAA/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[3, 54] = 23; P < .0001) but no effect of sex (F[1, 54] = 0.002; P = .96) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[3, 54] = 0.165; P = .25). Results for the Ch/Cr ratio demonstrated a main effect of brain region (F[2, 56] = 74; P < .0001) but no effect of sex (F[1, 56] = 1.3; P = .25) and no interaction between brain region and sex (F[2, 56] = 0.027; P = .97).

To determine which brain regions differed for a given metabolic ratio, the post hoc analysis on the omnibus MANOVA consisted of calculating the Scheffé F statistic for pairwise comparisons between brain regions for the NAA/Cr ratio (see www.ajnr.org for Table 3) and the Ch/Cr ratio (see www.ajnr.org for Table 4), respectively. Forty-five pairwise comparisons were made for both metabolic ratios. Twenty-one comparisons were significant for the NAA/Cr ratio (Table 3), and twenty-eight comparisons were significant for the Ch/Cr ratio (Table 4). For the NAA/Cr ratio, a direct comparison of regions containing predominately gray matter, like the four cerebral cortical regions and the gray matter nuclei of the basal ganglia and thalamus, did not show significant differences among each other. Similarly, a comparison of regions containing predominately white matter, like the frontal white matter and the posterior white matter, did not differ from each other. The white matter regions also did not differ from the pons. Each cortical gray matter had a smaller NAA/Cr ratio than each cerebral white matter region and the pons. Each cortical gray matter region except the frontal area had a larger NAA/Cr ratio than the cerebellum, with the frontal area not showing a significant difference with the cerebellum. The NAA/Cr ratio of the basal ganglia was significantly smaller than the frontal and posterior white matter regions and the pons, but it was not significantly different from the cerebellum. The thalamic NAA/Cr ratio, however, did not differ from the subcortical white matter regions or the pons, but it was larger than the cerebellum.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3:

Comparison of NAA/Cr between pairs of brain regions

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4:

Comparison of Ch/Cr between pairs of brain regions

The Ch/Cr ratio varied widely across different brain regions (Tables 2, 4). The cortical gray matter sites showed significant differences between each other, with only the occipital gray and parietal gray matter regions having similar Ch/Cr ratios. The ratio in the occipital gray matter was smaller than the ratio in the frontal and temporal regions. The Ch/Cr ratios in the two subcortical white matter sites were equivalent, but, unlike the NAA/Cr ratio, they had significantly different (smaller) ratios compared with the pons. The basal ganglia and thalamus had statistically similar Ch/Cr ratios. The basal ganglia showed few significant differences with other regions. The thalamus also differed with only a few regions. The post hoc Scheffé F statistic analyses on both the omnibus MANOVA and in the MANOVA calculated separately for each group resulted in similar findings, which suggests that the three groups of subjects had relatively homogeneous variance with regard to MR spectroscopy measurements of the metabolic ratios.

Discussion

Many MR spectroscopy data bases of normal brain metabolites and metabolic ratios published to date use stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) short TE proton MR spectroscopy. In clinical practice, however, the PRESS technique, with longer echo times, is also used. We undertook this study to establish a data base of normal metabolic values obtained with the PRESS technique and a long echo time. These results provide normal reference values for comparison with spectra from adults with neurologic disease.

We studied a number of different regions of the brain because of the histologic and functional differences of cortical and subcortical areas. Cytoarchitectural studies of gray matter indicate that there are six fundamental layers of cortex that can be differentiated on the basis of geometry, attenuation, and types of cells (14). Cytoarchitectural maps like the Broadmann map demonstrate how these cortical layers also vary across brain regions (14). This variance in histology is often related to function. Functional imaging methods have confirmed clinical and electrophysiologic evidence that cortical regions can have different functions (15). Organization of the cortical gray matter differs from that of the thalamus, basal ganglia, and cerebellum, and gray matter in general is different from white matter (14). Although we expected subcortical white matter regions to be similar, we included white matter regions in the frontal and posterior areas on the possibility that metabolic ratios might vary based on the percentage of association or projection fibers. Because there are neurologic diseases that do not have a predilection for any particular brain location yet different areas of the brain vary according to function and histology, we established a data base of normal controls that included metabolic values for a number of brain regions.

Our study found significant differences in both the NAA/Cr and Ch/Cr ratios across various brain regions. The NAA/Cr ratio differed between white matter and gray matter brain regions but did not vary significantly within gray matter or within white matter regions (Tables 1, 3). There were also no significant differences in the NAA/Cr ratio of gray matter regions and cortical nuclei or in white matter regions and the pons. The white matter regions and the pons had lager NAA/Cr ratios compared with the cortical gray matter, basal ganglia, and cerebellum. The cerebellum had a smaller NAA/Cr ratio compared with the gray matter and the thalamus. The Ch/Cr ratio demonstrated greater variability across brain regions than did the NAA/Cr ratio, including variation within gray matter sites (Tables 2, 4). The Ch/Cr ratio did not differ significantly within different white matter sites.

Prior studies, most of which used short TE STEAM MR spectroscopy, also demonstrated that metabolite concentrations vary across brain regions (5–12). A report that is comparable to our study in technique rather than aim was primarily targeted at determining the reproducibility of MR spectroscopy spectra in vivo and in vitro rather than determining a normative range (16). Metabolic concentrations and ratios in a single voxel placed over the parietal white matter in both hemispheres were measured normal volunteers by using similar parameters as our study. The mean NAA/Cr ratio in parietal white matter was consistent with the NAA/Cr ratio we report in the posterior white matter.

Metabolite concentrations are also affected by age (5–7, 9, 17–20). Myoinositol is the dominant peak in short TE spectra of in neonates, choline is the dominant peak in older infants, and the adult spectrum has NAA as the major metabolite (6). Older adults show different NAA, Cr, and Ch levels compared with young adults (18–20). Our study is pertinent to MR spectroscopy in adults and is not necessarily applicable to the pediatric or geriatric population.

The effect of sex on metabolic ratios in normal individuals is less well studied, and conclusions of the few published reports have been conflicting. Some studies showed no sex differences in NAA/Cr, NAA/Ch, and Ch/Cr ratios or absolute concentration in white matter and gray matter (8, 12, 18). A study by using the STEAM technique at short TE in six brain regions reported no sex difference in four regions. Increased levels of NAA in women compared with men were found in the sensorimotor cortex and orbitofrontal cortex (5). Another study used a PRESS sequence with a TE of 135 milliseconds revealed significantly smaller NAA/Ch and larger Ch/Cr ratios in the parietooccipital white matter in males as compared with females (21). Our study, utilizing a long TE PRESS technique and sampling from 10 brain regions, showed no sex differences in the metabolite ratios.

Because only three or four regions were measured for each subject group in our study, the effect of brain region on the metabolic ratio could result from a difference in variance between groups rather than a true difference between brain regions. Measurement of metabolite ratios in all 10 regions of interest in each subject would have been ideal; however, time constraints precluded us from doing so. The Scheffé F statistic, the most conservative of the paired comparison procedures (13), was used in the data analysis to account for this potential confounding variable. This procedure is useful for post hoc comparisons if samples sizes vary in size and if there is a possibility of heterogeneous variances among groups. The post hoc analysis by using Scheffé F statistic resulted in similar findings in both the omnibus MANOVA and in the MANOVA calculated separately for each group, which indicates that the three groups of subjects had relatively homogeneous variance within the measured metabolic ratios.

The Ch/Cr ratio varied significantly within gray matter regions. This variability could be technical in nature because of data collection and processing limitations or errors. The large voxel size inherent to single voxel MR spectroscopy means that volumes of interest do not contain only one tissue type. Other technical factors include artifacts from inadequate shimming in regions close to bone. Suboptimal shimming affects spectral quality and the metabolic ratios. Our results, as well as others reported in the literature, could be refined by additional shimming procedures, by segmenting gray and white matter to achieve a more homogeneous volume of interest, and by off-line processing of data, but these steps are rarely used in the clinical setting. The variability in Ch/Cr could also be biologic in nature. A previous study reported that choline levels changed across gray matter regions (12). We used the same collection and processing parameters for NAA/Cr and Ch/Cr, and no significant variation was observed for NAA/Cr within gray matter sites. It is unlikely that a technical problem would cause variation in the Ch/Cr ratio in gray matter and no variation in NAA/Cr ratio.

Both the PRESS and STEAM techniques are used in clinical practice today and are available on most commercially made high field scanners. Compared with PRESS, the major advantage of STEAM is that shorter echo times can be used to detect small metabolites with shorter T2 times (1–3). The main disadvantage of the STEAM sequence is its lower signal intensity–to-noise ratio compared with PRESS. PRESS was used in this study because it offers the benefits of improved signal intensity–to-noise ratio and a simpler spectrum with less peak interference from lipid signals and metabolites with short T2 values, which aids in the interpretation of the spectrum (1–3). We chose a TE of 135 milliseconds because this TE is close to an odd multiple of the inverse of the J coupling, or spin-spin coupling constant for lactate (J = 7.3 Hz; 1/J = 136 milliseconds). Lactate is inverted at this TE and can be better differentiated from lipids. Longer echo times such as 270 milliseconds or 288 milliseconds can also be used, but they do not invert lactate and can result in signal intensity loss due to T2 signal intensity decay. Disadvantages of PRESS include more modulation from J coupling and less sensitivity to metabolites with short T2 values, which can be important in the clinical evaluation of certain diseases (1–3).

Quantification of metabolites in MR spectroscopy can be difficult, so a more practical method to assess variations in metabolite levels is to calculate peak area ratios. The metabolite ratios calculated in this study are routinely employed in clinical practice. They are simple to obtain, require no technical expertise or additional software, are independent of changes in coil loading or other differences among individuals, and do not require relaxation-time measurements (1–3, 8). The metabolites of interest are in lower concentrations in CSF, so ratios are relatively unaffected by inclusion of small amounts of CSF in the voxel as compared with the use of absolute metabolite concentrations. A limitation of using metabolic ratios is that the concentration of both metabolites could be abnormally increased or decreased together, resulting in a normal ratio despite the presence of disease. If Cr is used as the reference value, the assumption that its concentration does not change is not always the case and can lead to erroneous interpretation (1, 11).

A need exists for a normal reference range of metabolite ratios for single voxel, long TE, PRESS MR spectroscopy. A data base of normal values can be referred to while reading clinical cases and also minimizes the need to perform MR spectroscopy on the brain contralateral to the area of pathology. We provide physicians who interpret an MR spectroscopy study in the clinical setting a set of reference values (Table 1, 2) to compare with the MR spectroscopy data acquired at their respective institutions.

Conclusion

The NAA/Cr ratio was consistent within cortical gray and white matter but differed between cortical gray and white matter. The Ch/Cr ratio was variable in the gray matter and differed between some but not all gray and white matter regions but was consistent within subcortical white matter regions. There was no sex difference for either metabolic ratio. The results of this study provide a reference set of normal values for MR spectroscopy studies in adults acquired with a single voxel, PRESS, long TE technique.

References

  1. ↵
    Salibi N, Brown MA. Clinical MR spectroscopy: first principles. New York: Wiley-Liss;1998;62–186
  2. Kwock L. Localized MR spectroscopy: basic principles. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1998;8:713–31
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Castillo M, Kwock L, Mukherji SK. Clinical applications of proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1–15
    PubMed
  4. ↵
    Novotny EJ Jr, Fulbright RK, Pearl PL, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of neurotransmitters in human brain. Ann Neurol 2003;54(Suppl 6):S25–S31
  5. ↵
    Grachev ID, Apkarian AV. Chemical heterogeneity of the living human brain: a proton MR spectroscopy study on the effects of sex, age, and brain region. Neuroimage 2000;11:554–563
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Kreis R, Ernst T, Ross BD. Development of the human brain: in vivo quantification of metabolite and water content with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:424–437
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Pouwels PJ, Brockmann K, Kruse B, et al. Regional age dependence of human brain metabolites from infancy to adulthood as detected by quantitative localized proton MRS. Pediatr Res 1999;46:474–485
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Komoroski RA, Heimberg C, Cardwell D, Karson CN. Effects of gender and region on proton MRS of normal human brain. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:427–433
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Cady EB, Penrice J, Amess PN, et al. Lactate, n-acetylaspartate, choline and creatine concentrations, and spin-spin relaxation in thalamic and occipito-parietal regions of developing human brain. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:878–886
    PubMed
  10. Michaelis T, Merboldt KD, Bruhn H, et al. Absolute concentrations of metabolites in the adult human brain in vivo: quantification of localized proton MR spectra. Radiology 1993;187:219–227
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Kreis R, Ernst T, Ross BD. Absolute quantitation of water and metabolites in the human brain. II. Metabolite concentrations. J Magn Reson Ser B 1993;102:9–19
    CrossRef
  12. ↵
    Pouwels PJ, Frahm J. Regional metabolite concentrations in human brain as determined by quantitative localized proton MRS. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:53–60
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    Scheffé H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 1953;40:87–104
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Carpenter MB. Core text of neuroanatomy. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1991 :250–429
  15. ↵
    Logothetis NK, Wandell BA. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Ann Rev Physiol 2004;66:735–769
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Marshall I, Wardlaw J, Cannon J, et al. Reproducibility of metabolite peak areas in 1H MRS of brain. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:281–292
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Peden CJ, Cowan FM, Bryant DJ, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy of the brain in infants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:886–894
    PubMed
  18. ↵
    Charles HC, Lazeyras F, Krishnan KR, et al. Proton spectroscopy of human brain: effects of age and sex. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1994;18:995–1004
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Shonk T, Ross BD. Role of increased cerebral myo-inositol in the dementia of Down syndrome. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:858–861
    PubMed
  20. ↵
    Leary SM, Brex PA, MacManus DG, et al. A (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of aging in parietal white matter: implications for trials in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:455–459
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Wilkinson ID, Paley MN, Miszkiel KA, et al. Cerebral volumes and spectroscopic proton metabolites on MR: is sex important? Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:243–248
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received August 29, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision October 27, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 6
1 Jun 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reference Values for Long Echo Time MR Spectroscopy in Healthy Adults
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Yair Safriel, MarlyAnne Pol-Rodriguez, Edward J. Novotny, Douglas L. Rothman, Robert K. Fulbright
Reference Values for Long Echo Time MR Spectroscopy in Healthy Adults
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1439-1445;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Reference Values for Long Echo Time MR Spectroscopy in Healthy Adults
Yair Safriel, MarlyAnne Pol-Rodriguez, Edward J. Novotny, Douglas L. Rothman, Robert K. Fulbright
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2005, 26 (6) 1439-1445;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Measuring Cerebral and Cerebellar Glutathione in Children Using 1H MEGA-PRESS MRS
  • Reduction in hypothalamic 1H-MRS metabolite ratios in patients with cluster headache
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire