Three-Dimensional Dynamic MR Digital Subtraction Angiography Using Sensitivity Encoding for the Evaluation of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study

References

1. ↵
   Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, Wilkinson ID, Anderson B, Romanowski CA. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892–1899

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M. Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 2000;42:104–107

   CrossRefPubMed
3. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1858–1864

   CrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Yoshino A, Hachiya J. MR digital subtraction angiography of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:707–711

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition, and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:551–556

   PubMed
6. ↵
   Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451–453

   PubMed
7. ↵
   Mori H, Aoki S, Okubo T, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of small to medium-size intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2003;45:27–33

   PubMed
8. ↵
   Warren DJ, Hoggard N, Walton L, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 2001;48:973–982; discussion 982–973

   CrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, Griffiths PD. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404–407

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    Noguchi K, Melhem ER, Kanazawa T, Kubo M, Kuwayama N, Seto H. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:183–190

    PubMed
11. ↵
    Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293–1295

    PubMed
12. ↵
    Wetzel SG, Haselhorst R, Bilecen D, et al. Preliminary experience with dynamic MR projection angiography in the evaluation of cervicocranial steno-occlusive disease. Eur Radiol 2001;11:295–302

    CrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952–962

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:671–677

    CrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    Golay X, Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, et al. PRESTO-SENSE: an ultrafast whole-brain fMRI technique. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:779–786

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA, Li W, Wolff S, Manning WJ, Edelman RR. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics: a pilot study. Radiology 2000;217:284–289

    PubMed
17. ↵
    Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591–603

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Chen Q, Quijano C, Mai V, et al. On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology 2004;231:893–899

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Meder JF, Oppenheim C, Blustajn J, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: the value of radiologic parameters in predicting response to radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1473–1483

    Abstract
20. ↵
    Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography–initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244–251

    PubMed
21. ↵
    Spetzler R, Martin N. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–483

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345–351

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877–881

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Barger AV, Block WF, Toropov Y, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging with isotropic resolution and broad coverage using an undersampled 3D projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:297–305

    CrossRefPubMed
25. Carroll TJ. The emergence of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for intracranial angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:346–348

    FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    Shim YW, Chung TS, Kang WS, Joo JY, Strecker R, Hennig J. Non-invasive follow-up evaluation of post-embolized AVM with time-resolved MRA: a case report. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:271–275

    PubMed
27. ↵
    Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, Strecker R. Time-resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:341–345

    PubMed
28. ↵
    Kesava P, Turski P. Magnetic resonance angiography of vascular malformations. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:811–833

    PubMed
29. ↵
    Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT, Knopp MV, van Kaick G, Essig M. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2957–2964. Epub 2002 Jun 4

    PubMed
30. ↵
    Mori H, Aoki S, Masumoto T, et al. Two-dimensional magnetic resonance digital substraction angiography using array spatial sensitivity encoding techniques in the assessment of intracranial hemodynamics. Radiat Med 2002;20:223–229

    PubMed
31. ↵
    Gaa J, Weidauer S, Requardt M, Kiefer B, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE. Comparison of intracranial 3D-ToF-MRA with and without parallel acquisition techniques at 1.5T and 3.0T: preliminary results. Acta Radiol 2004;45:327–332

    PubMed
32. ↵
    Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Boesiger P. Sensitivity encoded cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001;3:1–9

    CrossRefPubMed
33. ↵
    Frayne R, Grist TM, Swan JS, Peters DC, Korosec FR, Mistretta CA. 3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:476–487

    CrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    Paschal CB, Morris HD. K-space in the clinic. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:145–159

    CrossRefPubMed
35. ↵
    Sanelli PC, Mifsud MJ, Stieg PE. Role of CT angiography in guiding management decisions of newly diagnosed and residual arteriovenous malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:1123–1126

    PubMed
36. ↵
    Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642–651

    PubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Maki JH, Prince MR, Chenevert TC. Optimizing three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: original investigation. Invest Radiol 1998;33:528–537

    CrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    Leclerc X, Khalil C, Silvera S, et al. Imaging of non-traumatic intracerebral hematoma. J Neuroradiol 2003;30:303–316

    CrossRefPubMed