Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

The Utility of In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging in Differentiating Malignancy from Acute Benign Compression Fractures of the Spine

W.K. Erly, E.S. Oh and E.K. Outwater
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2006, 27 (6) 1183-1188;
W.K. Erly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.S. Oh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.K. Outwater
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Motor vehicle crash involving 31-year-old man. Images demonstrate signal intensity–to-noise measurement technique used in assessing the abnormal signal intensity in the acute T12 compression fracture (arrows).

    A, T1-weighted image.

    B, T2-weighted image.

    C, In-phase image.

    D, Opposed-phase image. Region of interest cursor is on the region of abnormal signal intensity on the T1- and T2-weighted images. SIR is 0.76, indicating the presence of fat or benign marrow. Note the suppression of signal intensity from the normal fatty marrow in the adjacent vertebra.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Plot of SIR of the data points with triangle indicating the benign fractures and circle denoting the malignant marrow infiltration. While there is variation in the SIR of the benign lesion, malignant infiltration does not suppress.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Illustration of the physical principles of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging.

    A, At echo time (TE) of 4.6 ms, both the fat and water protons are in phase, and signal intensity is received from voxels containing both tissue types.

    B, At TE of 2.4 ms, the protons on water and fat molecules are 180° opposed, and the signal intensity from one cancels the signal intensity from the other. Voxels that contain both tissue types have a reduction in signal intensity.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Metastatic melanoma in a 56-year-old man.

    A and B, Routine T1- and T2-weighted images of metastatic melanoma with pathologic fracture of L2 (arrows). Metastatic lesions of L1 and L3 are difficult to see on the routine sequences.

    C, In-phase image (TE = 4.6 ms).

    D, Opposed-phase image (echo time [TE] = 2.4 ms). Marrow replaced by tumor does not suppress (arrows), whereas the normal fatty marrow appears dark on these images (asterisks).

    E, In-phase image with region of interest cursor in place. Signal intensity ratio of L2 is 0.90, indicating the absence of fat and a malignant result.

    F, Opposed-phase image with region of interest cursor in place. Signal intensity ratio of L2 is 0.90, indicating the absence of fat and a malignant result.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Lymphoma in a 33-year-old man. False-negative for malignancy.

    A and B, T1- and T2-weighted images, respectively, done in February 2003 show abnormal decreased signal intensity (arrows) on the T1-weighted sequence and increased signal intensity (arrows) on the T2-weighted sequence compared with normal marrow. These findings were considered to be due to lymphomatous marrow infiltration.

    C and D, In-phase image and opposed-phase image, respectively, done in February 2003. Signal intensity measurement is 202 on the in-phase sequence and 215 on the opposed phase, a ratio of 1.1 or a malignant result.

    E–H, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, in-phase, and opposed-phase images 3 months later. Patient has received prior radiation therapy. T1- and T2-weighted images continue to show abnormal signal intensity relative to the normal marrow (arrows), though the signal intensity changes have evolved since the initial examination. Signal intensity on the in-phase image is 90 and 46 on the opposed-phase, a SIR of 0.51, a benign result in a lesion that was still considered malignant on the routine sequences.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 27 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 27, Issue 6
June 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Utility of In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging in Differentiating Malignancy from Acute Benign Compression Fractures of the Spine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
W.K. Erly, E.S. Oh, E.K. Outwater
The Utility of In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging in Differentiating Malignancy from Acute Benign Compression Fractures of the Spine
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2006, 27 (6) 1183-1188;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Utility of In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging in Differentiating Malignancy from Acute Benign Compression Fractures of the Spine
W.K. Erly, E.S. Oh, E.K. Outwater
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2006, 27 (6) 1183-1188;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Review of the Imaging Features of Benign Osteoporotic and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures
  • Predictive Models in Differentiating Vertebral Lesions Using Multiparametric MRI
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Advanced Imaging of Type 2 Spinal CSF Leaks
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire