Differences in Brain Structure in Deaf Persons on MR Imaging Studied with Voxel-Based Morphometry

References

1. ↵
   Mehl AL, Thomson V. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992–1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2002;109:E7
2. ↵
   Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:224–33

   CrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   Lee JS, Lee DS, Oh SH, et al. PET evidence of neuroplasticity in adult auditory cortex of postlingual deafness. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1435–39

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Neville HJ, Bavelier D, Corina D, et al. Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:922–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Finney EM, Clementz BA, Hickok G, et al. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects: evidence from MEG. Neuroreport 2003;14:1425–27

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Morita T, Naito Y, Tsuji J, et al. Relationship between cochlear implant outcome and the diameter of the cochlear nerve depicted on MRI. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2004;56–59
7. ↵
   Geschwind N, Levitsky W. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science 1968;161:186–87

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Bonvillian JD, Orlansky MD, Garland JB. Handedness patterns in deaf persons. Brain Cogn 1982;1:141–57

   CrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, et al. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21–36

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Good CD, Johnsrude I, Ashburner J, et al. Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:685–700

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Nichols T, Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res 2003;12:419–46

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Westbury CF, Zatorre RJ, Evans AC. Quantifying variability in the planum temporale: a probability map. Cereb Cortex 1999;9:392–405

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Rademacher J, Morosan P, Schormann T, et al. Probabilistic mapping and volume measurement of human primary auditory cortex. Neuroimage 2001;13:669–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Brett M. The MNI brain and the Talairach atlas. Available at: http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/Imaging/Common/mnispace.shtml.
15. ↵
    Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapping 2000;10:120–31

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Moore JK, Niparko JK, Perazzo LM, et al. Effect of adult-onset deafness on the human central auditory system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:385–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    Penhune VB, Cismaru R, Dorsaint-Pierre R, et al. The morphometry of auditory cortex in the congenitally deaf measured using MRI. Neuroimage 2003;20:1215–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Emmorey K, Allen JS, Bruss J, et al. A morphometric analysis of auditory brain regions in congenitally deaf adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:10049–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Kang E, Lee DS, Kang H, et al. Age-associated changes of cerebral glucose metabolic activity in both male and female deaf children: parametric analysis using objective volume of interest and voxel-based mapping. Neuroimage 2004;22:1543–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Finney EM, Fine I, Dobkins KR. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat Neurosci 2001;4:1171–73

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Shibata DK, Zhong J. Tactile vibrations are heard in auditory cortex in the deaf: study with FMRI. Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; Chicago, Ill;2001; p.259
22. ↵
    Mamata H, Mamata Y, Westin CF, et al. High-resolution line scan diffusion tensor MR imaging of white matter fiber tract anatomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:67–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Chang Y, Lee SH, Lee YJ, et al. Auditory neural pathway evaluation on sensorineural hearing loss using diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroreport 2004;15:1699–703

    CrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    Gates L, Yoon MG. Distinct and shared cortical regions of the human brain activated by pictorial depictions versus verbal descriptions: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2005;24:473–86

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Shibata DK, Kwok E. Temporal lobe perfusion in the deaf: MR measurement with pulsed arterial spin labeling. Acad Radiol 2006;13:738–43

    CrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    Munte TF, Altenmuller E, Jancke L. The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:473–78

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Toga AW, Thompson PM. Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:37–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Kertesz A, Black SE, Polk M, et al. Cerebral asymmetries on magnetic resonance imaging. Cortex 1986;22:117–27

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Kertesz A, Polk M, Black SE, et al. Sex, handedness, and the morphometry of cerebral asymmetries on magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res 1990;530:40–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    Watkins KE, Paus T, Lerch JP, et al. Structural asymmetries in the human brain: a voxel-based statistical analysis of 142 MRI scans. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:868–77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    Pilcher DL, Hammock EA, Hopkins WD. Cerebral volumetric asymmetries in non-human primates: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Laterality 2001;6:165–79

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. ↵
    Crow TJ. Handedness, language lateralisation and anatomical asymmetry: relevance of protocadherin XY to hominid speciation and the aetiology of psychosis. Point of view. Br J Psychiatry 2002;181:295–97

    FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Luders E, Gaser C, Jancke L, et al. A voxel-based approach to gray matter asymmetries. Neuroimage 2004;22:656–64

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    Bellugi U, Poizner H, Klima ES. Brain organization for language: clues from sign aphasia. Hum Neurobiol 1983;2:155–70

    PubMed
35. ↵
    Damasio A, Bellugi U, Damasio H, et al. Sign language aphasia during left-hemisphere Amytal injection. Nature 1986;322:363–65

    CrossRefPubMed
36. ↵
    Corina DP, San Jose-Robertson L, Guillemin A, et al. Language lateralization in a bimanual language. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:718–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Emmorey K, Damasio H, McCullough S, et al. Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language. Neuroimage 2002;17:812–24

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. Neuroimage 2001;14:1238–43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    Bookstein FL. “Voxel-based morphometry” should not be used with imperfectly registered images. Neuroimage 2001;14:1454–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. ↵
    Testa C, Laakso MP, Sabattoli F, et al. A comparison between the accuracy of voxel-based morphometry and hippocampal volumetry in Alzheimer’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:274–82

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. Giuliani NR, Calhoun VD, Pearlson GD, et al. Voxel-based morphometry versus region of interest: a comparison of two methods for analyzing gray matter differences in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2005;74:135–47

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    Eckert MA, Leonard CM, Wilke M, et al. Anatomical signatures of dyslexia in children: unique information from manual and voxel based morphometry brain measures. Cortex 2005;41:304–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. ↵
    Valente AA, Jr., Miguel EC, Castro CC, et al. Regional gray matter abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a voxel-based morphometry study. Biol Psychiatry 2005;58:479–87

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. ↵
    Padovani A, Borroni B, Brambati SM, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and voxel-based morphometry study in early progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;10:1136–48
45. ↵
    Karas GB, Burton EJ, Rombouts SA, et al. A comprehensive study of gray matter loss in patients with Alzheimer’s disease using optimized voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2003;18:895–907

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science