Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

Whole-Brain Histogram and Voxel-Based Analyses of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Magnetization Transfer Ratio in Celiac Disease, Epilepsy, and Cerebral Calcifications Syndrome

R. Della Nave, A. Magaudda, R. Michelucci, G. Capizzi, A. Calabrò, L. Guerrini, C. Gavazzi, S. Diciotti, P. Riguzzi, O. Daniele, N. Villari, C.A. Tassinari and M. Mascalchi
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2007, 28 (3) 479-485;
R. Della Nave
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Magaudda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Michelucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Capizzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Calabrò
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Guerrini
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Gavazzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Diciotti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Riguzzi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Daniele
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Villari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.A. Tassinari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Mascalchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion and magnetization transfer (MT) techniques have been applied to the investigation with MR of epilepsy and have revealed changes in patients with or without abnormalities on MR imaging. We hypothesized that also in the coeliac disease (CD), epilepsy and cerebral calcifications (CEC) syndrome diffusion and MT techniques could reveal brain abnormalities undetected by MR imaging and tentatively correlated to epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion and MT weighted images were obtained in 10 patients with CEC, 8 patients with CD without epilepsy and 17 healthy volunteers. The whole brain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and MT ratio (MTR) maps were analyzed with histograms and the Statistical Parametric Mapping 2 (SPM2) software. We employed the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to assess differences for ADC and MTR histogram metrics. Voxel by voxel comparison of the ADC and MTR maps was performed with 2 tails t-test corrected for multiple comparison.

RESULTS: A significantly higher whole brain ADC value as compared to healthy controls was observed in CEC (P = 0.006) and CD (P = 0.01) patients. SPM2 showed bilateral areas of significantly decreased MTR in the parietal and temporal subcortical white matter (WM) in the CEC patients.

CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that diffusion and MT techniques are also capable of revealing abnormalities undetected by MR imaging. In particular patients with CEC syndrome show an increase of the whole brain ADC histogram which is more pronounced than in patients with gluten intolerance. IN CEC patients, voxel-based analysis demonstrates a localized decrease of the MTR in the parieto-temporal subcortical WM.

In the syndrome of celiac disease, epilepsy, and cerebral calcifications (CEC), epilepsy is not strictly associated with local deposit of calcium.1 In fact, its onset can anticipate the appearance of calcifications on CT2,3 and its severity and evolution toward an epileptiform encephalopathy are independent of the extent of calcifications.4,5 MR imaging in patients with CEC syndrome does not show significant abnormalities.4,6,7 Diffusion and magnetization transfer (MT) techniques have been applied to the investigation with MR of epilepsy and have revealed focal or diffuse changes in patients with or without focal abnormalities on MR imaging.8–12 We hypothesized also that in CEC diffusion, MT techniques could reveal brain abnormalities undetected by MR imaging and tentatively correlated to epilepsy. To test this hypothesis we performed whole-brain histogram and voxel-based analyses of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) maps in a group of patients with CEC syndrome and 2 control groups represented by patients with celiac disease without epilepsy or neurologic involvement and healthy volunteers.

Materials and Methods

Patient Selection

Ten patients (7 women and 3 men; mean age, 29.6 ± 5.8 years) with CEC syndrome on a gluten-free diet (GFD) gave their informed consent to participate in this prospective study, which was approved by our local Ethical Committee. Their neurologic and electroencephalography (EEG) findings are summarized in Table 1. Nine of them showed cerebral calcifications with a typical distribution in prior CT examinations and had diagnoses of celiac disease based on the results of jejunal biopsy or presence of anti-gliadin, anti-endomysium, or anti-transglutaminase antibodies in the serum. Because CT scans obtained 0–16 years before MR imaging (mean, 8.5 years) were available for all patients, we did not repeat CT examination to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Clinical, EEG, and CT findings in 10 patients with CEC syndrome

One control group comprised 8 (7 women and 1 man; mean age, 33 ± 11.9 years) patients with celiac disease on a GFD without epilepsy or neurologic deficit, hereafter labeled as patients with CD. The other control group included 17 (7 women and 10 men; mean age, 34.2 ± 9.1 years) healthy volunteers. Because patients with CD do not show increased frequency of brain calcifications5,13 we did not submit them to CT.

MR Examination Protocol

All examinations were performed on a 1.5T system equipped with 30 mT/m gradients. After scouts, 3-mm axial T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (TR, 6000 ms; TE, 100 ms; inversion recovery, 2100 ms; FOV, 230 mm; matrix size, 256 × 256; NEX, 2) turbo spin-echo images were obtained. For diffusion-weighted imaging, 24 contiguous axial sections were acquired with a double-shot, echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence (TR, 1600 ms; TE, 102 ms, EPI factor, 15 with peripheral pulse gating). The section thickness was 5 mm, the FOV was 230 mm, and the matrix was 100 × 256. Diffusion-sensitizing gradients were applied along the 3 orthogonal axes using a b-value of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. For MT imaging, 24 contiguous sections were acquired with a T2*-weighted gradient recalled-echo sequence (TR, 640 ms; TE, 12 ms; flip angle, 20°; NEX, 2) with and without an off-resonance pulse (1.5-kHz; Gaussian envelope duration, 16.4 ms; flip angle, 50°). The section thickness was 5 mm, the FOV was 256 mm, and the matrix 192 × 256.

Image Evaluation and Data Analysis

Visual Assessment.

Two observers jointly rated the extent of cerebral calcifications in the CT of the patients with CEC by using a 4-point rating scale: 1, minimal, punctate, unilateral; 2, mild, punctate, bilateral; 3, moderate, punctate on one side and coarse on the other; and 4, severe, coarse, bilateral.

Moreover, they evaluated the FLAIR images of the patients and control subjects for possible areas of increased signal intensity, as well as the T2*-weighted gradient-echo images without MT pulse for possible areas of decreased signal intensity consistent with calcifications.

Data Analyses.

MRIcro 1.38 (http://www.mricro.com)14 was used for image display and histogram analysis. ImageJ 1.32 (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/) software was used for image display and MTR map calculation. Brain tissue extraction was performed using the Brain Extraction Tool (BET) (http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/bet2/index.html).15 SPM2 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) was used for image segmentation16 and voxel-based MTR and ADC analysis.10,12,17–19 Brain tissue volume, normalized for subject head size, was estimated by SIENAX (structural image evaluation, using normalization, of atrophy, single time-point version) method,20 part of FSL 3.2.21

Maps of the ADC were reconstructed for each diffusion-weighted image. MTR maps were calculated by a custom-made ImageJ plug-in applying the following equation, pixel by pixel, after automatic segmentation of brain from nonbrain tissue15: [(M0 − Ms)/M0] × 100, where M0 and Ms are the images obtained without and with the sequence with the MT saturation pulse, respectively.

Histogram Analysis

For each ADC and MTR map, 2 binary brain masks were created. The first, excluding nonbrain tissues and CSF, was obtained with the BET software.15 The second was created by SPM2 segmentation capability as the union of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) SPM2-segmented images to exclude the remaining CSF, using the equation (i1 + i2)>0.5 in the ImCalc function in SPM2, where i1 and i2 represent the probability maps for GM and WM, respectively. The 2 masks were intersected obtaining a final brain mask that was applied in MRIcro for ADC or MTR voxel-by-voxel data extraction. After normalization for brain volume, the 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentile values, skewness, and kurtosis of the whole-brain ADC and MTR histograms were computed using a custom-made Matlab (Matlab 6.5 R13; The MathWorks, Natick, Mass) program.

Brain Volume Analysis

To explore possible differences in brain atrophy between the subject and patients groups, SIENAX was applied to each subject T2*-weighted gradient-echo images without MT pulse to estimate the total brain volume, normalized for subject head size.

Voxel-Based Analysis

The origin of all source images was set on the anterior commissure. To improve the quality of segmentation and normalization,22 customized SPM2 templates were created for b0 EPI images and T2*-weighted gradient-echo images with MT saturation pulse using the whole sample of patients and control subjects. Spatial normalization parameters (12-parameter affine transformation, 16 nonlinear iterations) were estimated to match SPM2 EPI and T2 standard templates, respectively, and then applied to the original b0 EPI and T2* gradient- echo images. Normalized images were averaged and smoothed with a 8-mm Gaussian kernel to create the customized templates.23

For each b0 EPI image, normalization parameters were estimated with a 12-parameter affine and 16 nonlinear iterations using the customized b0 EPI template and then applied to the corresponding ADC map; the same procedure was applied to normalize MTR maps using T2*-weighted images and a T2*-customized template. Normalized ADC and MTR maps were smoothed with a 10-mm, full-width, half-maximum Gaussian kernel to improve normal distribution and increase signal-to-noise ratio (averaging out noise).

Statistical Analyses

We used the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to explore differences between the patients with CEC, the patients with CD, and healthy control subjects for ADC and MTR histogram features and for normalized total brain volume. Significance was set at P ≤ .01.

Voxel-by-voxel whole-brain comparison based on the general linear model, and the theory of Gaussian random fields was performed using SPM2 for ADC and MTR normalized maps. In these instances, the 2-tailed t test was chosen for group comparisons. For multiple comparison correction, the False Discovery Rate method was used,24 set at P ≤ .05; moreover, an extent threshold of 63 contiguous voxels (0.5 cm3) was adopted. The correlation between the localized areas of MTR changes in the brain (see below) and cerebral calcium extent score was assessed with SPM2 and a significance level of P < .05. We applied the MNI (Montreal Neurologic Institute) space utility (http://www.ihb.spb.ru/∼pet_lab/MSU/MSUMain.html) to achieve a more accurate spatial localization of the significant clusters.

Results

The extent of calcification in the patients with CEC was minimal in 3 patients, mild in 3 patients, moderate in 3 patients, and severe in 1 patient (Fig 1). Cerebral calcifications appeared as areas lacking in signal intensity on T2*-weighted images in patients with CEC with moderate or severe extent of calcifications (Fig 1). Few focal cerebral WM lesions appearing hyperintense in FLAIR images were present in 5 (50%) of 10 patients with CEC, in 3 (37%) of 8 patients with CD, and in none of the healthy control subjects.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Examples of visual rating of the extent of occipital calcifications on CT (A, C, E, and G) and corresponding T2*-weighted gradient-echo images without MT pulse (B, D, F, and H) in patients with CEC: minimal (score = 1) (A and B), mild (score = 2) (C and D), moderate (score = 3) (E and F), and severe (score = 4) (G and H). Only moderate and severe calcifications are appreciable as areas of low signal intensity in T2*-weighted images.

Table 2 details the results of the whole-brain histogram analyses of the ADC and MTR maps and of the normalized brain volume. A rightward shift of the ADC histogram with significantly higher value of the median ADC compared with healthy control subjects was observed in CEC (P = .006) and CD (P = .01) patients (Fig 2). Compared with healthy control subjects, patients with CEC also showed a significant increase in the 25th percentile value and a significant decrease of kurtosis and skewness. No significant differences were observed between the 3 groups concerning the 75th percentile. The differences between the 3 groups of subjects for MTR metrics were mild and nonsignificant.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Averaged whole-brain ADC histograms in the 3 groups of subjects. Patients with CEC and patients with CD show a rightward shift of the ADC values, implying increase of the median ADC value. In addition in patients with CEC and patients with CD, the histogram peak is less sharp, implying a reduced kurtosis, and the curve asymmetry is less pronounced, implying a reduced skewness.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Whole-brain histogram analysis of the ADC and MTR maps and SIENAX results in the three groups of subjects

No significant difference of the normalized brain volume was observed among the 3 subject groups. No cluster of significantly increased ADC was demonstrated in any of the 3 subject groups by SPM2 analysis.

In the patients with CEC, compared with healthy subjects, SPM2 showed areas of significantly decreased MTR in the subcortical WM of the parietal lobe, bilaterally, and left temporal lobe (Fig 3A and Table 3). Essentially the same areas of decreased MTR were also identified when comparing patients with CEC and patients with CD (Fig 3B). In this instance, however, the difference did not reach the statistical threshold chosen for multiple comparison (Table 4). SPM2 revealed no significant differences between MTR maps of CD and healthy control subjects. The focal areas of decreased MTR in patients with CEC did not correlate with the cerebral calcium extent score.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

SPM2 results showing areas of decreased MTR in patients with CEC versus healthy control subjects (A) and versus patients with CD (B) superimposed on anatomic references. In patients with CEC, areas of significantly (PFDRcorr<0.05) decreased MTR compared with control subjects (A) include the white matter of the parietal lobe bilaterally (see Table 3; unthresholded statistical map is provided as supplemental Fig 2). Compared with patients with CD (B), the patients with CEC show areas of decreased MTR (Puncorr < 0.001) in the white matter of the left temporal lobe and right parietal lobe (see Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Coordinates of the clusters of reduced MTR in the patients with CEC versus healthy control subjects

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4:

Coordinates of the clusters of reduced MTR in the patients with CEC versus patients with CD

Discussion

CD is an autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation in the wall of the small intestine caused by a permanent intolerance to gluten protein. Epilepsy prevalence in CD ranges between 1.2% and 5% of all CD cases.5,25,26 The CEC syndrome is a rare clinical condition; most cases are observed in Italy, Spain, and South America.3 Whether CEC is the consequence of an untreated CD, a genetic syndrome, or both has yet to be established.3

Epilepsy in CEC is characterized by occipital seizures and has a variable evolution. In fact, seizures may respond well to treatment or may be drug-resistant. The condition can also evolve into an epileptic encephalopathy that is associated with mental deterioration.3,6 EEG shows focal abnormalities localized over 1 or both occipital lobes or diffuse paroxysms.5,27

CT demonstration of cerebral calcifications is an important clue to the diagnosis of CEC and in epileptic patients should prompt investigation for CD.3 Typical calcifications are located in the occipital regions and appear as bilateral, linear, or flocculonodular, cortical or subcortical, roughly symmetrical or asymmetrical hyperdense areas.3,28 There is no brain atrophy. Calcifications of CEC are generally stable.26 Although GFD may be effective in controlling epilepsy,3,5,29 its usefulness in preventing or arresting brain calcifications in patients with CD with epilepsy has not been documented.

The possibility that some patients have an incomplete CEC triad is recognized.3 Patients with epilepsy and cerebral calcifications without CD are supposed to have CEC syndrome with silent or latent CD, and patients with CD and focal occipital epilepsy without cerebral calcifications are considered to have an incomplete form of CEC. Patients with CD and typical cerebral calcifications without epilepsy were also reported.3

The mechanism underlying calcifications in CEC is unknown.3 Low serum levels of folic acid are common in patients with CEC.3 However, the hypothesis that the calcifications are a consequence of a folic acid deficiency because of malabsorption, possibly exacerbated by antiepileptic drugs, which reduce folic acid absorption,29 is at variance with the observation that only a very small percentage of patients with CD without epilepsy have cerebral calcifications.5,13 Hence, it has been hypothesized that calcifications might merely represent an epiphenomenon of the underlying disease process.1

In line with prior reports4,6,30 MR imaging in our patients with CEC demonstrated moderate or extensive calcifications as areas of hypointensity in T2*-weighted images. Moreover, it showed few small focal cerebral WM hyperintense areas in 50% of patients with CEC and 37% of patients with CD. In our opinion, these WM lesions are related to CD rather than CEC. In fact, taking into account that our patients with CEC and CD were adults, our findings are in line with the 20% prevalence of similar WM lesions demonstrated by MR imaging in pediatric patients with CD on GFD and assumed to be ischemic in origin as a result of vasculitis or caused by inflammatory demyelination.13

ADC and MTR provide sensitive, quantitative, and reproducible information about physicochemical properties of the brain, which is relatively independent from MR signal intensity changes.10–12,31,32

In our study, we evaluated whole-brain ADC and MTR maps with histogram and voxel-based analyses. The 2 types of analysis share the capability to examine the whole brain in an automatic way but have different advantages and drawbacks that make them complementary. In fact, a histogram provides a measurement of the global brain damage and might better assess the effect of gluten sensitivity on the brain, whereas voxel-based methods are suitable for evaluation of focal abnormalities possibly associated with epilepsy.

We observed a significant increase of the median ADC in patients with either CD or CEC compared with healthy control subjects. The diffuse ADC abnormality was more prominent in CEC, in which an increase of the 25th percentile and a decrease of kurtosis and skewness of the ADC histogram compared with control subjects were also present, indicating a higher degree of damage. Similar changes of the ADC histogram metrics were reported in patients with multiple sclerosis.32 The discrepancy between ADC and MTR histogram findings in our study might arise from the fact that, whereas ADC is sensitive to the microscopic structure, MTR reflects the bound-to-free water ratio and could be a less sensitive marker of tissue change.

Although the voxel-based analysis of ADC failed to show significant focal abnormalities in patients with CEC, voxel-based analysis of MTR maps demonstrated a localized bilateral decrease of the MTR in the parietal and temporal subcortical WM compared with healthy control subjects. Interestingly, the same areas of decreased MTR in the parietal and temporal subcortical WM were identified in comparing patients with CEC and patients with CD, suggesting that they could be correlated to epilepsy.

We hypothesize that the areas of localized decrease of the MTR correspond to areas of gliosis. In fact, in the few cases of CEC in which pathologic examination was available, gliosis variably combined with axonal loss, and wallerian degeneration was found in addition to cerebral calcifications.3,33–35 Moreover, a study in an experimental animal model36 indicated that gliosis is associated with a decrease of MTR.

Whether these areas of decreased MTR in the parietal and temporal subcortical WM are cause or consequence of epilepsy in the CEC syndrome is an open question. The following 2 arguments support the hypothesis that they may have a possible epileptogenic role. First, electroencephalographic abnormalities were documented outside the occipital lobes in 6 of our 10 patients with CEC. Second, there is growing evidence that a focal decrease of MTR might be linked to epileptogenesis.12,37–39 In particular, in patients with neurocysticercosis, a closer correlation of epilepsy with perilesional gliosis appearing as a focal area of decreased MTR rather than with calcification was reported.37–39

We recognize 2 limitations of our study. First, we did not obtain CT examinations concurrently with MR. Coregistration of CT and MR examination should be considered in future studies. Second, we did not examine patients with CD and epilepsy without calcifications. This would have improved our understanding of the relationship between the focal MTR abnormalities and epilepsy.

Conclusion

Our study indicates that diffusion and MT techniques are also capable of revealing abnormalities undetected by MR imaging in patients with CEC. In particular, patients with CEC syndrome show an increase of the whole-brain ADC histogram, which is more pronounced than in patients with gluten intolerance. In patients with CEC, voxel-based analysis demonstrates a localized decrease of the MTR in the parieto-temporal subcortical WM, which might have a role beside cerebral calcifications in epileptogenesis. Further studies including ADC and MTR evaluation in patients with CD and epilepsy without calcifications are worthy to elucidate CEC pathophysiology.

References

  1. ↵
    Taylor I, Scheffer IE, Berkovic SF. Occipital epilepsies: identification of specific and newly recognized syndromes. Brain 2003;126:753–69
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Hernandez MA, Colina G, Ortigosa L. Epilepsy, cerebral calcifications and clinical or subclinical coeliac disease. Course and follow up with gluten-free diet. Seizure 1998;7:49–54
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Gobbi G. Coeliac disease, epilepsy and cerebral calcifications. Brain Dev 2005;27:189–200
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Triulzi F. Neuroradiological findings in celiac disease, epilepsy and cerebral calcifications. In: Gobbi G, Andermann F, Naccarato S, et al, eds. Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders in Coeliac Disease. London: John Libbey & Co;1997 :187–94
  5. ↵
    Magaudda A, Dalla Bernardina B, Magazzù G, et al. Bilateral occipital calcifications, epilepsy and coeliac disease: report of 22 cases and prevalence study of calcifications in epilepsy and coeliac disease. In: Gobbi G, Andermann F, Naccarato S, et al, eds. Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders in Coeliac Disease. London: John Libbey & Co;1997 :121–32
  6. ↵
    Magaudda A, Della Bernardina B, De Marco P, et al. Bilateral occipital calcification, epilepsy and celiac disease: clinical and neuroimaging features of a new syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:885–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Santos CH, Almeida IL, Gomes MD, et al. Bilateral occipital calcification, epilepsy and coeliac disease: case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002;60:840–43
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Ferini-Strambi L, Bozzali M, Cercignani M, et al. Magnetization transfer and diffusion-weighted imaging in nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 2000;54:2331–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Arfanakis K, Herman BP, Rogers BP, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI in temporal lobe epilepsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:511–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Rugg-Gunn FJ, Eriksson SH, Symms MR, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of cryptogenic and acquired partial epilepsies. Brain 2001;124:627–36
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. Eriksson SH, Rugg-Gunn FJ, Symms MR, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with epilepsy and malformations of cortical development. Brain 2001;124:617–26
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Rugg-Gunn FJ, Eriksson SH, Boulby PA, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging in focal epilepsy. Neurology 2003;60:1638–45
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Kieslich M, Errazuriz G, Posselt HG, et al. Brain white-matter lesions in celiac disease: a prospective study of 75 diet-treated patients. Pediatrics 2001;108:E21
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol. 2000;12:191–200
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Smith S. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Map 2002;17:143–45
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Ashburner J, Friston K. Multimodal image co-registration and partitioning-a unified framework. Neuroimage 1997;6:209–17
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Foong J, Symms MR, Barker GJ, et al. Neuropathological abnormalities in schizophrenia: evidence from magnetization transfer imaging. Brain 2001;124:882–92
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. Leung LH, Ooi GC, Kwong DL, et al. White-matter diffusion anisotropy after chemo-irradiation: a statistical parametric mapping study and histogram analysis. Neuroimage 2003;21:261–68
  19. ↵
    Bruno SD, Barker GJ, Cercignani M, et al. A study of bipolar disorder using magnetization transfer imaging and voxel-based morphometry. Brain 2004;127:2433–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, et al. Accurate, robust and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. NeuroImage 2002;17:479–89.
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004;23:208–19.
    CrossRef
  22. ↵
    Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, et al. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry-the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Nichols T, Hayasaka S. Controlling the family wise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res 2003;12:419–46
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Luostarinen L, Pirttila T, Collin P. Coeliac disease presenting with neurological disorders. Eur Neurol 1999;42:130–35
  26. ↵
    Chapman RWG, Laidlow JL, Colin-Jones DG, et al. Increased prevalence of epilepsy in celiac disease. BMJ 1978;2:250–51
    FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Gobbi G, Sorrenti G, Cantucci M, et al. Epilepsy with bilateral occipital calcifications: a benign onset with progressive severity. Neurology 1988;38:913–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Longo M, Magaudda A, Dalla Bernardina B, et al. Sindrome delle calcificazioni occipitali bilaterali, epilessia e malattia celiaca. Diagnosi differenziale con la sindrome di Sturge-Weber. Studio multicentrico in 20 casi. In: Neuroradiologia 1992. Scotti G, ed. Udine: Edizioni del Centauro;1992 :109–12
  29. ↵
    Ambrosetto G, Antonini L, Tassinari CA. Occipital lobe seizures related to clinically asymptomatic celiac disease in adulthood. Epilepsia 1992;23 Suppl 4:476–81
  30. ↵
    Lea ME, Harbord M, Sage MR. Bilateral occipital calcification associated with celiac disease, folate deficiency, and epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:1498–500
    Abstract
  31. ↵
    Rovaris M, Iannucci G, Cercignani M, et al. Age-related changes in conventional, magnetization transfer, and diffusion-tensor MR findings: study with whole-brain tissue histogram analysis. Radiology 2003;227:731–38
    PubMed
  32. ↵
    Cercignani M, Bozzali M, Iannucci G, et al. Magnetization transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and gray matter from patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:311–17
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Taly AR, Nagaraja D, Das S, et al. Sturge-Weber-Dimitri disease without facial nevus. Neurology 1987;37:1063–64
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. Bye AME, Andermann F, Robitaille Y, et al. Cortical vascular abnormalities in the syndrome of celiac disease, epilepsy, bilateral occipital calcifications, and folate deficiency. Ann Neurol 1993;34:399–403
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Toti P, Balestri P, Cano M, et al. Celiac disease with cerebral calcium and silica deposits: x-ray spectroscopic findings, an autopsy study. Neurology 1995;46:1088–92
  36. ↵
    Kimura H, Meaney DF, McGowan JC, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging of diffuse axonal injury following experimental brain injury in the pig: characterization by magnetization transfer ratio with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:540–46
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Pradhan S, Kathuria MK, Gupta RK. Perilesional gliosis and seizure outcome: a study based on magnetizaztion transfer magnetic resonance imaging in patients with neurocysticercosis. Ann Neurol 2000;48:181–87
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. Kumar R, Gupta RK, Husain M, et al. Magnetization transfer MR imaging in patients with post-traumatic epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;23:218–24
  39. ↵
    Agarwal A, Raghav S, Husain M, et al. Epilepsy with focal cerebral calcification: role of magnetization transfer MR imaging. Neurol India 2004;52:197–99
    PubMed
  • Received April 19, 2006.
  • Accepted after revision June 1, 2006.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 3
March 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Whole-Brain Histogram and Voxel-Based Analyses of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Magnetization Transfer Ratio in Celiac Disease, Epilepsy, and Cerebral Calcifications Syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R. Della Nave, A. Magaudda, R. Michelucci, G. Capizzi, A. Calabrò, L. Guerrini, C. Gavazzi, S. Diciotti, P. Riguzzi, O. Daniele, N. Villari, C.A. Tassinari, M. Mascalchi
Whole-Brain Histogram and Voxel-Based Analyses of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Magnetization Transfer Ratio in Celiac Disease, Epilepsy, and Cerebral Calcifications Syndrome
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2007, 28 (3) 479-485;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Whole-Brain Histogram and Voxel-Based Analyses of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Magnetization Transfer Ratio in Celiac Disease, Epilepsy, and Cerebral Calcifications Syndrome
R. Della Nave, A. Magaudda, R. Michelucci, G. Capizzi, A. Calabrò, L. Guerrini, C. Gavazzi, S. Diciotti, P. Riguzzi, O. Daniele, N. Villari, C.A. Tassinari, M. Mascalchi
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2007, 28 (3) 479-485;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • STRUCTURAL ANOMALY OF LEFT LATERAL TEMPORAL LOBE IN EPILEPSY DUE TO MUTATED LGI1
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire