Noninvasive Imaging of Treated Cerebral Aneurysms, Part I: MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Coiled Aneurysms

References

1. ↵
   Adams WM, Laitt RD, Jackson A. The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1618–28

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. Atlas SW, Sheppard L, Goldberg HI, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: detection and characterization with MR angiography with use of an advanced postprocessing technique in a blinded-reader study. Radiology 1997;203:807–14

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. Horikoshi T, Fukamachi A, Nishi H, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurysms by three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroradiology 1994;36:203–07

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, et al. Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:449–55

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, et al. Postoperative 3D angiography in intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1463–69

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1545–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Anzalone N, Righi C, Simionato F, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:746–52

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Boulin A, Pierot L. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;219:108–13

   PubMed
9. ↵
   Brunereau L, Cottier JP, Sonier CB, et al. Prospective evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial saccular aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:216–23

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, et al. MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:279–86

    Abstract
11. Kahara VJ, Seppanen SK, Ryymin PS, et al. MR angiography with three-dimensional time-of-flight and targeted maximum-intensity-projection reconstructions in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms embolized with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1470–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Weber W, Yousry TA, Felber SR, et al. Noninvasive follow-up of GDC-treated saccular aneurysms by MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1792–97

    CrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    Molyneaux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trail (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Molyneaux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Manabe H, Fujita S, Hatayama T, et al. Re-rupture of coil-embolized aneurysm during long-term observation: case report. J Neurosurg 1998;88:1096–98

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneaux AJ, et al. Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656–63

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. Hodgson TJ, Carroll T, Jellinek DA. Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to late recurrence of a previously unruptured aneurysm after complete endovascular occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1939–41

    Abstract
19. Hope JK, Byrne JV, Molyneux AJ. Factors influencing successful angiographic occlusion of aneurysms treated by coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:391–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. Malisch TW, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;87:176–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. Lin T, Fox AJ, Drake CG. Regrowth of aneurysm sacs from residual neck following aneurysm clipping. J Neurosurg 1989;70:556–60

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Todd NC. Aneurysm rebleeding after treatments that leave the aneurysm sac patent. Br J Neurosurg 1990;4:373–79

    PubMed
23. ↵
    McDougall CG, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, et al. Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using electrolytically detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1996;84:393–99

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997;86:475–82

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. Vanninen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, et al. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils—a prospective randomized study. Radiology 1999;211:325–36

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Kuether TA, Nesbit GS, Barnwell SL. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: a single-center experience. Neurosurgery 1998;43:1016–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. Leffers AM, Wagner A. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: a retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 2000;41:204–10

    FREE Full Text
29. Warnock NG, Gandhi MR, Bergvall U, et al. Complications of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease. Br J Radiol 1993;66:855–58

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243–46

    PubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 1987;18:997–1004

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    CARAT Investigators. Rates of delayed rebleeding from intracranial aneurysms are low after surgical and endovascular treatment. Stroke 2006;37:1437–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Masaryk AM, Frayne R, Unal O, et al. Utility of CT angiography and MR angiography for the follow-up of experimental aneurysms treated with stents or Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1523–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. ↵
    Westerlaan HE, van der Vliet AM, Hew JM, et al. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology 2005;47:622–29

    CrossRefPubMed
35. ↵
    Gaurvit JY, Leclerc X, Pernodet M, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: usefulness of 6-month imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:515–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    Leclerc X, Navez JF, Gauvrit JY, et al. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1121–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. ↵
    Pierot L, Delcourt C, Bouquigny F, et al. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:744–49

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. ↵
    Farb RI, Nag S, Scott JN, et al. Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:507–15

    CrossRefPubMed
39. ↵
    Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK, et al. Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology 2007;242:647–49. Epub 2007 Jan 9

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. ↵
    Hartmann J, Nguyen T, Larsen D, et al. MR artifacts, heat production, and ferromagnetism of Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:497–501

    Abstract
41. ↵
    Schmalbrock P, Yaun C, Chakeres DW, et al. Volume MR angiography: methods to achieve very short echo times. Radiology 1990;175:861–65

    PubMed
42. ↵
    Wehrli FW, Chao PW, Youssem DM. Parameter dependence of susceptibility-induced signal losses in gradient-echo imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1989;7:139
43. ↵
    Gonner F, Heid O, Remonda L, et al. MR angiography with ultrashort echo time in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1324–28

    Abstract
44. ↵
    Walker MT, Tsai J, Parish T, et al. MR angiographic evaluation of platinum coil packs at 1.5T and 3T: an in vitro assessment of artifact production— technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:848–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. ↵
    Majoie CB, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. ↵
    Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1797–803

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. ↵
    van Holten J, Wielopolski P, Bruck E, et al. High flip angle imaging of metallic stents: implications for MR angiography and intraluminal signal interpretation. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:879–83

    CrossRefPubMed
48. ↵
    Wang Y, Truong TN, Yen C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:972–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science