Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleSPINE

Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma

T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. te Rijdt, B. Kegelaers and J.-L. Termote
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2007, 28 (8) 1444-1450; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0608
T.H. Mulkens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Marchal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Daineffe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Salgado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Bellinck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. te Rijdt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Kegelaers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-L. Termote
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A, A 53-year-old woman after polytrauma. Sagittal 2.50 mm image of standard-dose 16-MDCT examination (120 kV and fixed 250 mAs) shows fracture at the base of the dens of C2 (arrow). Calculated effective at examination is 3.9 mSv. B, A 62-year-old man after polytrauma. Sagittal 2.5-mm image of low-dose 16-MDCT examination (100 kV and 141 mAs, after tube current modulation) shows fracture at the base of the dens of C2 (arrow). Calculated effective dose is 1.4 mSv.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A, A 53-year-old-man after a high-velocity motor vehicle crash with head injury. Axial 2.5-mm image shows double fracture (arrows) at the transition of the body with each posterior arc of C2. Calculated effective dose of low-dose 16-MDCT examination (100 kV and 96 mAs) is 0.98 mSv. B, Coronal 2.5-mm image shows bilateral fractures at the base of each lateral mass of C2 (arrows). C, Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows fracture at the left arc of C2 (arrow) and at the left arc of C1 (open arrow). D, Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows avulsion fracture of the posterior margin of the body of C2 (open arrow) and posterior subluxation of both posterior arches of C1 and C2 (arrows).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A, A 50-year-old woman with history of lung carcinoma with heavy neck pain after minor blunt cervical trauma. Axial 2.5-mm image shows bilateral osteolytic lesions in each lateral mass of the atlas (C1) (open arrows) and midline fracture (arrow) of the posterior arc of C1. Calculated effective dose of low-dose 6-MDCT examination (130 kV and 89 mAs) is 1.48 mSv. B, Coronal 2.5-mm image confirms bilateral osteolytic lesions in each lateral mass of C1 (open arrows) and transverse fracture (arrows) trough the right lateral mass.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A, A 25-year-old man with tetraplegia after a diving accident. Axial 2.5-mm image shows cross-like burst fracture of the body of C5 (open arrow) with posterior displacement and bilateral fractures (arrows) of the posterior arcs. Calculated effective dose of low-dose 16-MDCT examination (120 kV and 160 mAs) is 2.6 mSv. B, Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows burst fracture of the body of C5 (open arrow) with posterior displacement and spinal cord compression.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    A 39-year-old man with hyperextension trauma of the cervical spine. Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows fracture of the spinous process of C7 (arrow). Calculated effective dose of low-dose 6-MDCT examination (110 kV and 56 mAs) is 0.78 mSv.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    A, An 82-year-old woman with acute neck pain after a motor vehicle crash. Standard radiography, lateral view, was interpreted as negative, but additional CT was proposed because of technical failure to view the lower cervical segment C7 (superposition of the shoulders). B, Standard radiograph with odontoid view was interpreted as negative for fracture in the region of the cranio-cervical junction. C, Sagittal 2.5-mm image of low-dose 16-MDCT-examination (100 kV and 165 mAs) clearly depicts fracture (arrows) at the base of the axis (C2). D, Axial 2.5-mm image of the same low-dose CT examination shows more complex fracture of the body of C2, bilaterally extending in the lateral masses (arrows). Calculated effective dose of MDCT examination is 1.3 mSv.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Data of standard- and low-dose cervical spine trauma MDCT examinations

    VariableStandard DoseLow Dose: High Tube VoltageLow Dose: Low Tube Voltage
    Tube typeFixed tube currentTube current modulationTube current modulation
    No. of patients517070
    Effective dose, mSv*3.75 ± 0.251.57 ± 0.381.08 ± 0.28
    Image noise, HU*14.82 ± 5.4617.46 ± 6.5019.72 ± 6.17
    Image quality scores (0–4)*
        Reviewer 13.02 ± 0.623.04 ± 0.512.95 ± 0.65
        Reviewer 23.02 ± 0.473.06 ± 0.522.94 ± 0.56
        Reviewer 32.92 ± 0.642.99 ± 0.632.81 ± 0.62
        Reviewer 42.82 ± 0.652.90 ± 0.712.70 ± 0.67
    • Note:—Reviewers 1 and 2 are experienced radiologists; reviewers 3 and 4 are a second-year and a first-year resident, respectively.

    • * Data are mean ± SD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 8
September 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. te Rijdt, B. Kegelaers, J.-L. Termote
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1444-1450; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0608

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. te Rijdt, B. Kegelaers, J.-L. Termote
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1444-1450; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0608
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Systematic Radiation Dose Reduction in Cervical Spine CT of Human Cadaveric Specimens: How Low Can We Go?
  • Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study
  • Raise the Bar and Lower the Dose: Current and Future Strategies for Radiation Dose Reduction in Head and Neck Imaging
  • Low Kilovoltage CT of the Neck with 70 kVp: Comparison with a Standard Protocol
  • Implementation of Automated Tube Current Modulation in PET/CT: Prospective Selection of a Noise Index and Retrospective Patient Analysis to Ensure Image Quality
  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography
  • Crossref (63)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study
    Torsten Diekhoff, Kay-Geert A Hermann, Juliane Greese, Carsten Schwenke, Denis Poddubnyy, Bernd Hamm, Joachim Sieper
    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2017 76 9
  • Spine Computed Tomography Doses and Cancer Induction
    Paula J. Richards, Jennifer George, Marie Metelko, Mark Brown
    Spine 2010 35 4
  • Posterior cranial fossa morphometry in symptomatic adult Chiari I malformation patients: Comparative clinical and anatomical study
    Ahmet Dagtekin, Emel Avci, Engin Kara, Deniz Uzmansel, Oykut Dagtekin, Aslihan Koseoglu, Derya Talas, Celal Bagdatoglu
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 2011 113 5
  • Imaging Evaluation of Adult Spinal Injuries: Emphasis on Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
    Felipe Munera, Luis A. Rivas, Diego B. Nunez, Robert M. Quencer
    Radiology 2012 263 3
  • Low Kilovoltage CT of the Neck with 70 kVp: Comparison with a Standard Protocol
    R. Gnannt, A. Winklehner, R. Goetti, B. Schmidt, S. Kollias, H. Alkadhi
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012 33 6
  • CT dose optimisation and reduction in osteoarticular disease
    A. Gervaise, P. Teixeira, N. Villani, S. Lecocq, M. Louis, A. Blum
    Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 2013 94 4
  • Technical aspects of CT imaging of the spine
    Bernhard Tins
    Insights into Imaging 2010 1 5-6
  • Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction
    Fabio Becce, Yosr Ben Salah, Francis R. Verdun, Bruno C. Vande Berg, Frederic E. Lecouvet, Reto Meuli, Patrick Omoumi
    Skeletal Radiology 2013 42 7
  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography
    E.J. Lee, S.K. Lee, R. Agid, P. Howard, J.M. Bae, K. terBrugge
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2009 30 9
  • Radiation dose reduction in multidetector CT in fracture evaluation
    Jung Woo Yi, Hee Jin Park, So Yeon Lee, Myung Ho Rho, Hyun Pyo Hong, Yoon Jung Choi, Mi Sung Kim
    The British Journal of Radiology 2017 90 1077

More in this TOC Section

  • Bern Score Validity for SIH
  • MP2RAGE 7T in MS Lesions of the Cervical Spine
  • Deep Learning for STIR Spine MRI Quality
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire