Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma

T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. te Rijdt, B. Kegelaers and J.-L. Termote
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2007, 28 (8) 1444-1450; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0608
T.H. Mulkens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Marchal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Daineffe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Salgado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Bellinck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. te Rijdt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Kegelaers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.-L. Termote
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    A, A 53-year-old woman after polytrauma. Sagittal 2.50 mm image of standard-dose 16-MDCT examination (120 kV and fixed 250 mAs) shows fracture at the base of the dens of C2 (arrow). Calculated effective at examination is 3.9 mSv. B, A 62-year-old man after polytrauma. Sagittal 2.5-mm image of low-dose 16-MDCT examination (100 kV and 141 mAs, after tube current modulation) shows fracture at the base of the dens of C2 (arrow). Calculated effective dose is 1.4 mSv.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A, A 53-year-old-man after a high-velocity motor vehicle crash with head injury. Axial 2.5-mm image shows double fracture (arrows) at the transition of the body with each posterior arc of C2. Calculated effective dose of low-dose 16-MDCT examination (100 kV and 96 mAs) is 0.98 mSv. B, Coronal 2.5-mm image shows bilateral fractures at the base of each lateral mass of C2 (arrows). C, Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows fracture at the left arc of C2 (arrow) and at the left arc of C1 (open arrow). D, Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows avulsion fracture of the posterior margin of the body of C2 (open arrow) and posterior subluxation of both posterior arches of C1 and C2 (arrows).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A, A 50-year-old woman with history of lung carcinoma with heavy neck pain after minor blunt cervical trauma. Axial 2.5-mm image shows bilateral osteolytic lesions in each lateral mass of the atlas (C1) (open arrows) and midline fracture (arrow) of the posterior arc of C1. Calculated effective dose of low-dose 6-MDCT examination (130 kV and 89 mAs) is 1.48 mSv. B, Coronal 2.5-mm image confirms bilateral osteolytic lesions in each lateral mass of C1 (open arrows) and transverse fracture (arrows) trough the right lateral mass.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A, A 25-year-old man with tetraplegia after a diving accident. Axial 2.5-mm image shows cross-like burst fracture of the body of C5 (open arrow) with posterior displacement and bilateral fractures (arrows) of the posterior arcs. Calculated effective dose of low-dose 16-MDCT examination (120 kV and 160 mAs) is 2.6 mSv. B, Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows burst fracture of the body of C5 (open arrow) with posterior displacement and spinal cord compression.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    A 39-year-old man with hyperextension trauma of the cervical spine. Sagittal 2.5-mm image shows fracture of the spinous process of C7 (arrow). Calculated effective dose of low-dose 6-MDCT examination (110 kV and 56 mAs) is 0.78 mSv.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    A, An 82-year-old woman with acute neck pain after a motor vehicle crash. Standard radiography, lateral view, was interpreted as negative, but additional CT was proposed because of technical failure to view the lower cervical segment C7 (superposition of the shoulders). B, Standard radiograph with odontoid view was interpreted as negative for fracture in the region of the cranio-cervical junction. C, Sagittal 2.5-mm image of low-dose 16-MDCT-examination (100 kV and 165 mAs) clearly depicts fracture (arrows) at the base of the axis (C2). D, Axial 2.5-mm image of the same low-dose CT examination shows more complex fracture of the body of C2, bilaterally extending in the lateral masses (arrows). Calculated effective dose of MDCT examination is 1.3 mSv.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Data of standard- and low-dose cervical spine trauma MDCT examinations

    VariableStandard DoseLow Dose: High Tube VoltageLow Dose: Low Tube Voltage
    Tube typeFixed tube currentTube current modulationTube current modulation
    No. of patients517070
    Effective dose, mSv*3.75 ± 0.251.57 ± 0.381.08 ± 0.28
    Image noise, HU*14.82 ± 5.4617.46 ± 6.5019.72 ± 6.17
    Image quality scores (0–4)*
        Reviewer 13.02 ± 0.623.04 ± 0.512.95 ± 0.65
        Reviewer 23.02 ± 0.473.06 ± 0.522.94 ± 0.56
        Reviewer 32.92 ± 0.642.99 ± 0.632.81 ± 0.62
        Reviewer 42.82 ± 0.652.90 ± 0.712.70 ± 0.67
    • Note:—Reviewers 1 and 2 are experienced radiologists; reviewers 3 and 4 are a second-year and a first-year resident, respectively.

    • * Data are mean ± SD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 8
September 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. te Rijdt, B. Kegelaers, J.-L. Termote
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1444-1450; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0608

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma
T.H. Mulkens, P. Marchal, S. Daineffe, R. Salgado, P. Bellinck, B. te Rijdt, B. Kegelaers, J.-L. Termote
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1444-1450; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0608
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Systematic Radiation Dose Reduction in Cervical Spine CT of Human Cadaveric Specimens: How Low Can We Go?
  • Comparison of MRI with radiography for detecting structural lesions of the sacroiliac joint using CT as standard of reference: results from the SIMACT study
  • Raise the Bar and Lower the Dose: Current and Future Strategies for Radiation Dose Reduction in Head and Neck Imaging
  • Low Kilovoltage CT of the Neck with 70 kVp: Comparison with a Standard Protocol
  • Implementation of Automated Tube Current Modulation in PET/CT: Prospective Selection of a Noise Index and Retrospective Patient Analysis to Ensure Image Quality
  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Fixed Tube Current and Combined Automatic Tube Current Modulation in Craniocervical CT Angiography
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Advanced Imaging of Type 2 Spinal CSF Leaks
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire