Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain

The Venous Distension Sign: A Diagnostic Sign of Intracranial Hypotension at MR Imaging of the Brain

R.I. Farb, R. Forghani, S.K. Lee, D.J. Mikulis and R. Agid
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2007, 28 (8) 1489-1493; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0621
R.I. Farb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Forghani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.K. Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.J. Mikulis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Agid
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with intracranial hypotension (IH) demonstrate intracranial venous enlargement with a characteristic change in contour of the transverse sinus seen on routine T1-weighted sagittal imaging. In IH, the inferior margin of the midportion of the dominant transverse sinus acquires a distended convex appearance; we have termed this the venous distension sign (VDS). This is distinct from the normal appearance of this segment, which usually has a slightly concave or straight lower margin. This sign is introduced, and its performance as a test for the presence of this disease is evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The transverse sinuses on T1-weighted sagittal imaging of 15 patients with IH and 15 control patients were independently assessed in a blinded fashion by 3 readers for the presence of a VDS. A present or absent VDS was determined for each patient by each reader, and a consensus result for each patient was determined by unanimity or majority rule.

RESULTS: Using the VDS, the readers correctly identified 93% (14 of 15) of the IH patients and similarly 93% (14 of 15) of the control patients. There was a high rate of agreement among the readers for the interpretation of the VDS (multirater κ = 0.82). The overall sensitivity of the VDS for the diagnosis of intracranial hypotension was 94%. Specificity was also 94%.

CONCLUSION: The VDS appears to be an accurate test for the presence or absence of IH and may be helpful in the evaluation of these patients.

Intracranial hypotension (IH) is a syndrome of variable etiologies, clinical presentations, and MR imaging appearances that share a unifying cause of CSF volume depletion and resultant low CSF hydrostatic pressure.1–7 The syndrome of spontaneous IH (SIH) typically presents with orthostatic headache associated with MR findings and most commonly results from spontaneous leak of CSF from the spinal thecal sac. Iatrogenic causes of IH include “over shunting” associated with CSF diversion procedures, as well as continued leaks after surgical procedures and lumbar punctures. Many characteristic MR findings have been associated with IH regardless of its etiology.1–12

On review of the MR imaging of patients presenting to our institution with IH, we have identified a highly reliable novel imaging sign for the diagnosis of IH. We have termed this sign the “venous distension sign” (VDS) and evaluated for it on routine nonenhanced sagittal T1-weighted imaging of the brain. In patients with IH, the dural sinuses enlarge as they compensate for the loss of intracranial CSF volume.2,7,13,14 This phenomenon is not easily quantified; however, the expansion results in a characteristic change in the contour of the dural sinuses. This contour change is readily appreciated at the level of the transverse sinus on standard nonenhanced T1-weighted sagittal images of the brain. The presence of this sign can be determined in a binary fashion. Specifically, when visualized in its midportion on sagittal images of the brain, the contour of the dominant (larger) transverse sinus normally has a concave or straight inferior border (Fig 1). In cases of IH, the inferior border acquires a distended appearance with a convex bulging of its inferior border (a VDS, as in Figs 2 and 3). The purpose of this paper is to report this sign and evaluate its performance in a controlled trial for identifying patients with IH and differentiating them from normal age- and sex-matched control subjects.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Normal contour of the transverse sinus. A, T1-weighted image through the approximated middle third of the dominant transverse sinus in a normal control. B, Magnified and cropped image of boxed area in A. C, Same image as B, with schematic representations of the inferior border of the transverse sinus drawn on the image. Both solid and dashed lines represent the normal variability in the contour of this lower border as demonstrated in individual normal controls D through K. The dotted line in C depicts the distended, convex, lower border of the middle third of the dominant transverse sinus (the VDS) as seen in intracranial hypotension (Fig 3).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Typical MR findings in IH. A, Midline sagittal T1-weighted image showing the “sagging brain” appearance with distortion of the anterior margin of the pons and medulla (black arrows) and decreased vertical dimension of the suprasellar cistern and sagging tuber cinereum (dashed arrow), as well as the prominent pituitary gland (white arrow). B, Axial T2-weighted image showing effacement of the perimesencephalic cistern (dotted arrows), as well as the elongated anteroposterior dimension of the midbrain. C, Axial T2-weighted gradient echo (susceptibility weighted) image showing small bilateral subdural effusions (short arrows) with a small amount of hemosiderin staining (arrowheads), indicating previous subdural hemorrhage. D, Gadolinium-enhanced axial T1-weighted image demonstrating diffuse pachymeningeal (dural) enhancement (open arrows). E, T1-weighted image through the approximated middle third of the dominant transverse sinus (located by dashed line in B). F, Magnified image of boxed area in E showing the convex inferior margin of the transverse sinus (curved arrow), that is, the VDS indicative of IH.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Examples of the VDS in 5 patients with IH pretreatment and posttreatment with EBP. A–E, Magnified and cropped sagittal T1-weighted images through the approximated middle third of the dominant transverse sinus of IHPs 1, 5, 11, 13, and 14 at presentation. A′–E′, Corresponding image of each patient at follow-up MR imaging, after EBP and resolution of symptoms. Note the change in the contour of the transverse sinus (particularly the inferior border) between the before and after images of each patient (arrows).

Materials and Methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this project.

Patients with IH

A retrospective review of clinical and imaging records was carried out to identify patients evaluated for IH at our institution from February 2001 to September 2005. Criteria used in this study to firmly establish the diagnosis of IH were similar to those reported previously for SIH2,15 and include the following: diffuse headache that worsens within 15 minutes after sitting or standing; evidence of low CSF pressure on MR imaging; and spontaneous headache resolution or within several days after epidural blood patch (EBP). Fifteen IH patients (IHPs) with complete MR imaging at presentation were identified and included 13 women and 2 men with an overall average age of 46 years. Of the 15 patients with confirmed IH, 12 presented with primary SIH, 2 presented after lumbar puncture, and 1 after a spinal anesthetic procedure. All 15 of the IHPs provided the typical clinical presentation of orthostatic headaches, as well as characteristic findings at gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the brain. Nine of the 15 went on to have EBP treatment, 4 had spontaneous resolution of their symptoms, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Follow-up MR imaging of the brain was available in 10 of the 15 IHPs.

Control Patients

Eighty consecutive potential control patients (CPs) were recruited from the population of cancer patients at our institution who were undergoing screening for intracranial metastatic disease. These patients had no clinical signs or symptoms of neurologic disease. At gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging, 21 of these patients had intracranial abnormalities (metastatic disease) and were excluded from the study. Images from 3 of the CPs were no longer available for review in this study. The preliminary control population consisted of 56 patients with an average age of 58 years and a female-to-male ratio of 1:0.9. A final control population of 15 age-approximated control subjects was derived from the larger control population by sequestering the youngest patients available within the preliminary control population. This control population included 13 women and 2 men, with an overall average age of 51 years. Informed consent was obtained from all of the control subjects before their participation.

MR Imaging, Processing, and Review

All of the MR examinations were carried out with a superconducting 1.5T MR system (Signa EchoSpeed 8.2.3–11.2 software; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) with a standard head coil. All of the examinations included a T1-weighted sagittal conventional spin-echo (CSE) sequence (TR/TE, 600 ms/14 ms; section thickness, 5 mm with an intersection gap of 2 mm; and frequency- and phase-encoding matrix, 256 × 192). This T1-weighted sagittal CSE sequence was the only sequence used for this study. Images of this sequence for each IH and CP were transferred to a PACS viewing workstation (Merge efilm 1.9.4, Milwaukee, Wis). Three neuroradiologists (R.A., S.K.L., D.J.M.) acted as readers for this study. Each reader was independently trained for several minutes on the use of the VDS by the principal author (R.I.F.) and study coordinator (R.F.) by using examples of control and confirmed IHPs not otherwise used in any portion of the study. To standardize the application and interpretation of this sign, the larger (dominant) of the 2 transverse sinuses was used. The middle third of this dominant sinus was approximated to ensure that contour evaluations were not influenced by proximity of the torcula herophili or the sigmoid sinus. The reader was asked to tabulate whether the VDS was present or absent for each image set. The readers were told that they would be evaluating a total of 30 case subjects but were given no indication regarding the number of IHPs versus normal CPs in the randomly assigned grouping. Each of the 15 CPs and 15 IHPs were assigned an identifying number and were then mixed with a digital randomizer. Images were displayed on the viewing workstation with the image cropped such that the readers could easily scroll through the sequential images of each patient's T1 sagittal sequence. In this manner, only the right and left transverse sinuses and little else of the intracranial anatomy were visible to the readers, thus minimizing the possibility that the readers could inadvertently identify other imaging cues of IH. All of the patient information was removed from the images. The review sessions were prepared in this masked (blinded) manner by the study coordinator (R.F.). At each review session, the reader was assisted by the study coordinator to ensure that patient identifiers were removed from the images, the data forms were completed, and the protocol of image presentation was maintained. Care was taken to ensure that R.F. did not inadvertently impart information that would assist or influence the readers in their interpretations. Each reader independently reviewed the 30 sets of images. The results of the 3 readers were grouped for each patient, and a consensus response was derived based on the majority opinion (2 of 3) for response to the binary type question.

Results

The results of the study are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2. The normal contour of the middle segment of the transverse sinus on sagittal imaging was surprisingly consistent, displaying a variable contour of the upper border, a slightly convex posterior (calvarial) border, and a concave or straight inferior border as shown in Fig 1 (an absent VDS). This contour of the midtransverse sinus was seen in 14 of the 15 CPs. Conversely, in 14 of the 15 patients with IH, the inferior border of the midtransverse sinus displayed a convex margin (a VDS). In all 10 of the patients with MR follow-up, resolution of symptoms of IH paralleled the resolution of the MR findings, including the VDS, which reverted to “absent” in all of the subjects (Fig 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patients with intracranial hypotension

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Control patients

Performance of the VDS as a Test

This sign proved to be a highly accurate test for IH with a high rate of agreement among the readers (multirater κ = 0.82). The overall sensitivity of the sign was 93.3%. The 3 readers correctly identified the IHPs with a VDS in 14 of 15 subjects (unanimously in 12 subjects and by most [2 of 3] in 2 subjects). In only 1 subject (IHP 10) did the VDS fail to identify a patient with IH, because 2 of the 3 readers tabulated it negative for the sign (Fig 4). Specificity of the sign was 93.3%. The 3 readers correctly identified the CPs with a negative VDS in 14 of 15 subjects (unanimously in 13 subjects and by most in 1 subject). In 1 subject (CP 1), all of the readers incorrectly designated a CP as a patient with IH with a VDS (Fig 5). The 41 remaining (nonage-matched) CPs were reviewed in a nonrandomized fashion by the principal author alone. In all of the subjects the VDS was negative.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

False-negative case. Sagittal T1-weighted image through the approximated middle third of the dominant transverse sinus magnified and cropped of IHP 10. This was interpreted as absent VDS by 2 of the 3 readers and was, therefore, registered as a false-negative result. Note the lower margin of the transverse sinus does appear straight (arrow).

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

False-positive case. Sagittal T1-weighted image through the approximated middle third of the dominant transverse sinus magnified and cropped of CP 1. This was interpreted as a VDS by all 3 of the readers and, therefore, registered as a false-positive result. Note that the lower margin of the transverse sinus does appear slightly convex (arrow).

Discussion

The CSF, arterial and venous pressure-volume dynamic, and its effect on the intracranial contents are explained by what has become known as the Monro-Kellie hypothesis. This concept, which takes its origins from Monro's16 original publication,2,13 holds that, in the intact skull, the sum of the volumes of brain, blood, CSF, meninges, and ECF must remain constant. Because the brain itself is not significantly compressible or expandable, a loss of CSF volume must be compensated by an increase in extracellular fluid (ECF) and/or blood volume. These elements also have limitations in accommodating the needed volume. The blood-brain barrier restricts ECF expansion internal to the arachnodural junction; however, significant transudate can accumulate external to this layer of the meninges in patients with IH and is seen on postgadolinium enhanced T1-weighted imaging as pachymeningeal thickening and enhancement. This accumulation of fluid occurs in the loose connective tissue of the so-called “subdural space.” The intracranial venous compartment, in particular, the dural sinuses, can substantially enlarge to compensate for lost CSF volume (resulting in the VDS described here). The MR findings associated with IH (Fig 2) can be predicted by the Monro-Kellie hypothesis and can be categorized as either compensatory or passive. Venous engorgement with enlargement of the dural venous sinuses, enlargement of the pituitary gland, thickening and subsequent enhancement of the loose connective tissue of the subdural space, and transudative fluid collections within this space, as well as frank subdural hematomas are all phenomena that “compensate” for the loss of intracranial volume. The passive findings, which include “slitlike” lateral ventricles and effacement of sulci, as well as the downward transtentorial herniation of the brain with the “sagging brain” appearance, result from the CSF hypovolemia and are further exacerbated by the supratentorial compensatory phenomena. The recognition and interpretation of these MR findings remain qualitative and somewhat subjective. In florid cases of IH, all or most of these findings would probably be present. However, the clinical and MR presentation of this disease is commonly variable1,3,5,17–23 and can occasionally provide a diagnostic challenge; thus, a quantitative reliable sign of venous engorgement may prove useful. We initially noted this VDS at gadolinium-enhanced MR venography in patients with IH and subsequently found that the presence or absence of this sign was easily determined on standard nonenhanced sagittal T1-weighted images.

As a compensatory phenomenon, venous dilation probably occurs early in the course of IH accounting for the high prevalence of this sign in these patients. The concept that the signs of IH appear in a sequential, escalating fashion dependent on the duration and rate of CSF leak has been proposed previously.7,24 In a corollary fashion, venous distension is probably the first finding of IH to disappear on cessation of the CSF leak (after EBP or spontaneous closure), whereas other findings of IH, such as dural enhancement and subdural fluid collections, would require more time to resolve. This concept may explain the single “false-negative” occurrence (Fig 4) in this study (IHP 10). This IHP did have spontaneous resolution of symptoms and may have been imaged shortly after the CSF stopped leaking. This postulate that the MR findings of IH will ensue and subsequently recede in a predictable sequence may be substantiated in the future. The single false-positive case in this study is shown in Fig 5. The explanation for this occurrence is uncertain. It may simply relate to normal variation of the contour of the normal transverse sinus and suggests a possible limitation of VDS. The convex contour of the undersurface of the transverse sinus, however, was not encountered in any of the remaining 41 nonage-matched control subjects.

In summary, evaluation of headache is a common indication for MR of the brain worldwide. IH is increasingly being recognized as a treatable cause of headache that, when left undiagnosed, can lead to prolonged disability. Furthermore, misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary invasive interventions. IH may not be readily apparent clinically and, thus, not suspected at the time of MR referral. As shown in the present study, the VDS is a reliable sign for the presence of IH that can be applied to the most common and rudimentary of sequences (nonenhanced sagittal T1-weighted image) providing insight into the status of intracranial pressure simply with a glance at the contour of the transverse sinus. In our experience and as shown in the present trial, the VDS appears to be an accurate and potentially helpful imaging sign for the diagnosis of IH.

Footnotes

  • This research was supported by the Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto.

References

  1. ↵
    Mokri B. Headaches caused by decreased intracranial pressure: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:319–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Schievink WI. Spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypotension. JAMA 2006;295:2286–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Dillon WP, Fishman RA. Some lessons learned about the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1001–02
  4. Mokri B. Syndrome of cerebral spinal fluid hypovolemia: clinical and imaging features and outcome. Neurology 2001;56:1607–08
  5. ↵
    Chung SJ, Kim JS, Lee MC. Syndrome of cerebral spinal fluid hypovolemia: clinical and imaging features and outcome. Neurology 2000;55:1321–27
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Ferrante E, Savino A, Sances G, et al. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome: report of twelve cases. Headache 2004;44:615–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Paldino M, Mogilner AY, Tenner MS. Intracranial hypotension syndrome: a comprehensive review. Neurosurg Focus 2003;15:ECP2
    PubMed
  8. Fishman RA, Dillon WP. Dural enhancement and cerebral displacement secondary to intracranial hypotension. Neurology 1993;43:609–11
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Bakshi R, Mechtler LL, Kamran S, et al. MRI findings in lumbar puncture headache syndrome: abnormal dural-meningeal and dural venous sinus enhancement. Clin Imaging 1999;23:73–76
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. Francia A, Parisi P, Vitale AM, et al. Life-threatening intracranial hypotension after diagnostic lumbar puncture. Neurol Sci 2001;22:385–89
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Bruera OC, Bonamico L, Giglio JA, et al. Intracranial hypotension: the nonspecific nature of MRI findings. Headache 2000;40:848–52
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Kuhn J, Hofmann B, Knitelius HO, et al. Bilateral subdural haematomata and lumbar pseudomeningocele due to a chronic leakage of liquor cerebrospinalis after a lumbar discectomy with the application of ADCON-L gel. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1031–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Mokri B. The Monro-Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion. Neurology 2001;56:1746–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Baryshnik DB, Farb RI. Changes in the appearance of venous sinuses after treatment of disordered intracranial pressure. Neurology 2004;62:1445–46
    FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24(suppl 1):9–160
  16. ↵
    Monro A. Observations on Structure and Functions of the Nervous System. Edinburgh, UK: Creech and Johnson;1783
  17. ↵
    Mokri B, Atkinson JL, Piepgras DG. Absent headache despite CSF volume depletion (intracranial hypotension). Neurology 2000;55:1722–24
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. Ferrante E, Savino A. Nonpostural headache by spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Headache 2003;43:127–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. Ferrante E, Savino A. Thunderclap headache caused by spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurol Sci 2005;26(suppl 2):s155–s157
  20. Mokri B, Atkinson JL, Dodick DW, et al. Absent pachymeningeal gadolinium enhancement on cranial MRI despite symptomatic CSF leak. Neurology 1999;53:402–04
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. Kashmere JL, Jacka MJ, Emery D, et al. Reversible coma: a rare presentation of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Can J Neurol Sci 2004;31:565–68
    PubMed
  22. Schievink WI. Misdiagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1713–18
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Schievink WI, Tourje J. Intracranial hypotension without meningeal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. Case report. J Neurosurg 2000;92:475–77
    PubMed
  24. ↵
    Brightbill TC, Goodwin RS, Ford RG. Magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial hypotension syndrome with pathophysiological correlation. Headache 2000;40:292–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received December 5, 2006.
  • Accepted after revision January 29, 2007.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 8
September 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Venous Distension Sign: A Diagnostic Sign of Intracranial Hypotension at MR Imaging of the Brain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.I. Farb, R. Forghani, S.K. Lee, D.J. Mikulis, R. Agid
The Venous Distension Sign: A Diagnostic Sign of Intracranial Hypotension at MR Imaging of the Brain
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1489-1493; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0621

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
The Venous Distension Sign: A Diagnostic Sign of Intracranial Hypotension at MR Imaging of the Brain
R.I. Farb, R. Forghani, S.K. Lee, D.J. Mikulis, R. Agid
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2007, 28 (8) 1489-1493; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0621
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnostic Yield of Decubitus CT Myelography for Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas
  • Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group
  • Evaluation of MR Elastography as a Noninvasive Diagnostic Test for Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension
  • Optic Nerve Sheath MR Imaging Measurements in Patients with Orthostatic Headaches and Normal Findings on Conventional Imaging Predict the Presence of an Underlying CSF-Venous Fistula
  • Transvenous embolization of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas: Independent validation and feasibility of upper-extremity approach and using dual-microcatheter and balloon pressure cooker technique
  • Likelihood of Discovering a CSF Leak Based on Intracranial MRI Findings in Patients without a Spinal Longitudinal Extradural Collection: A New Probabilistic Scoring System
  • Teaching NeuroImages: Intracranial hypotension in a patient with Marfan syndrome
  • MRI Findings after Recent Image-Guided Lumbar Puncture: The Rate of Dural Enhancement and Subdural Collections
  • Angiographic cerebral venous sinus calibers and drainage patterns in patients with normal intracranial pressure and idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • The Interpeduncular Angle: A Practical and Objective Marker for the Detection and Diagnosis of Intracranial Hypotension on Brain MRI
  • Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Systematic Imaging Approach for CSF Leak Localization and Management Based on MRI and Digital Subtraction Myelography
  • Teaching NeuroImages: Intracranial hypotension in a patient with Marfan syndrome
  • Imaging Signs in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Prevalence and Relationship to CSF Pressure
  • Rebound Intracranial Hypertension: A Complication of Epidural Blood Patching for Intracranial Hypotension
  • MR Imaging of the Optic Nerve Sheath in Patients with Craniospinal Hypotension
  • Relative Decrease in Signal Intensity of Subcortical White Matter in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension on Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Images
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire