Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleBrain

3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA

R.P. Lim, M. Shapiro, E.Y. Wang, M. Law, J.S. Babb, L.E. Rueff, J.S. Jacob, S. Kim, R.H. Carson, T.P. Mulholland, G. Laub and E.M. Hecht
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2008, 29 (10) 1847-1854; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1252
R.P. Lim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Shapiro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.Y. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Law
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.S. Babb
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.E. Rueff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.S. Jacob
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.H. Carson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.P. Mulholland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Laub
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E.M. Hecht
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al, for the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2007 update—a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007;115 ;e172 . Epub 2006 Dec 28
    FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Gasecki AP, Eliasziw M, Ferguson GG, et al. Long-term prognosis and effect of endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis and contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion: results from NASCET—North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. J Neurosurg 1995;83:
  3. ↵
    Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363:1491–502
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B, et al. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1117–22
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Brobeck BR, Forero NP, Romero JM. Practical noninvasive neurovascular imaging of the neck arteries in patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack, and suspected arterial disease that may lead to ischemia, infarction, or flow abnormalities. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006;27:177–93
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345–51
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh R, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1615–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Turski PA, Korosec FR, Carroll TJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid bifurcation using the time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) technique. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:175–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Parrish T, Hu X. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:326–36
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Vogt FM, Eggebrecht H, Laub G, et al. High spatial and temporal resolution MRA (TWIST) in acute aortic dissection: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Berlin, Germany: ISMRM;2007 . Berlin, Germany: May 19–25, 2007
  14. ↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrics 1986;42:121–30
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213–19
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Lenhart M, Framme N, Volk M, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:535–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Fellner C, Lang W, Janka R, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries using three different techniques: accuracy compared with intraarterial x-ray angiography and endarterectomy specimens. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:424–31
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Meckel S, Mekle R, Taschner C, et al. Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with GRAPPA on a 1.5-T system for imaging of craniocervical vascular disease: initial experience. Neuroradiology 2006;48:291–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Nael K, Michaely HJ, Villablanca P, et al. Time-resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 Tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol 2006;41:116–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Du J, Fain SB, Korosec FR, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid imaging using undersampled projection reconstruction acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:1093–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Krings T, Hans F. New developments in MRA: time-resolved MRA. Neuroradiology 2004;46 (suppl 2):s214–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Tsuchiya K, Honya K, Fujikawa A, et al. Postoperative assessment of extracranial-intracranial bypass by time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography using parallel imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2243–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Pinto C, Hickey R, Carroll TJ, et al. Time-resolved MR angiography with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition and time-resolved echo-sharing angiographic technique for hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:1003–09
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Frydrychowicz A, Bley TA, Winterer JT, et al. Accelerated time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T: clinical experience in 31 patients. MAGMA 2006;19:187–95
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:283–89
    PubMed
  27. ↵
    Grobner T. Gadolinium: a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:1104–08
    FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Lev MH, Romero JM, Gonzalez RG. Flow voids in time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis? It depends on the TE! AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2120
    FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Lell M, Fellner C, Baum U, et al. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:104–10
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Townsend TC, Saloner D, Pan XM, et al. Contrast material-enhanced MRA overestimates severity of carotid stenosis, compared with 3D time-of-flight MRA. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:36–40
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Song T, Laine AF, Chen Q, et al. A quantitative simulation approach for optimization of spiral k-space-sampled time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Berlin, Germany: ISMRM;2007 . Berlin, Germany: May 3–9, 2007
  32. ↵
    Frayne R, Grist TM, Swan JS, et al. 3D MR DSA: effects of injection protocol and image masking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:476–87
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Gauvrit JY, Law M, Xu J, et al. Time-resolved MR angiography: optimal parallel imaging method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:835–38
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Heverhagen JT. Noise measurement and estimation in MR imaging experiments. Radiology 2007;245:638–39
    CrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 10
November 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
R.P. Lim, M. Shapiro, E.Y. Wang, M. Law, J.S. Babb, L.E. Rueff, J.S. Jacob, S. Kim, R.H. Carson, T.P. Mulholland, G. Laub, E.M. Hecht
3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2008, 29 (10) 1847-1854; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1252

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA
R.P. Lim, M. Shapiro, E.Y. Wang, M. Law, J.S. Babb, L.E. Rueff, J.S. Jacob, S. Kim, R.H. Carson, T.P. Mulholland, G. Laub, E.M. Hecht
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2008, 29 (10) 1847-1854; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1252
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Appropriate Minimal Dose of Gadobutrol for 3D Time-Resolved MRA of the Supra-Aortic Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Single-Phase High-Resolution 3D Contrast-Enhanced MRA
  • Cerebral Perfusion After Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia with Common Carotid Artery Occlusion After ECMO Therapy
  • Comparison of Time-Resolved and First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Pretherapeutic Evaluation of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas
  • Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for pre-angiographic evaluation of suspected spinal dural arterial venous fistulas
  • Improved Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Achieved by Use of Dose-Reduced Gadolinium Blood-Pool Agents for Time-Resolved Intracranial MR Angiography
  • Proximal Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusion, Collateral Vessels, and Walking Performance in Peripheral Artery Disease
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • Quiet PROPELLER MRI Techniques Match the Quality of Conventional PROPELLER Brain Imaging Techniques
  • Predictors of Reperfusion in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire