Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Occlusive Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients

K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, T. Kunieda, N. Takabatake, S. Yamamoto and M. Watanabe
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2008, 29 (4) 773-780; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0906
K. Imai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Mori
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Izumoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Kunieda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Takabatake
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Yamamoto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Watanabe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1:

    OTDT/OTPT, preprocedural neurologic symptoms, and DWI/angiographic findings in the occlusion group

    Patient/Sex/Age (y)OTDT/OTPT (h)Preprocedural Neurologic SymptomsA-NIHSS/P-NIHSSHigh Signal Intensity on DWIOccluded Vessels*
    1/M/5768/72Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP12/34M, P, CERlt.V4-pBA, rt.V1
    2/M/7231/48Stupor, OP, BP, HP8/21M, CER, OLlt.V4, rt.V1
    3/M/631/3Coma, AR, OP, BP, QP29/29P, CERlt.V4, rt.V3
    4/M/755/7Somnolence, OP, BP, QP17/17Plt.V4, rt.V3, pBA
    5/F/628/10Somnolence, BP, HP12/12P, CERmBA
    6/F/734/6Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP34/34M, P, MB, CERlt.V3, rt.V1
    7/M/741/3Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP34/34MB, CERpBA
    8/M/775/7Stupor, AR, OP, BP, QP22/22P, CER, OLlt.V4-pBA, rt.V2
    9/M/849/11Somnolence, BP, HP3/15PmBA, lt.V4
    10/F/743/5Coma, AR, OP, BP, QP30/30P, OLmBA
    11/M/742/17Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP4/30CERlt.V4-pBA, rt.V2
    12/M/637/9Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP35/35P, CERrt.V4, lt.V3
    13/F/7624/47Stupor, AR, OP, BP, QP6/27P, CER, OLlt.V4, rt.V4
    14/F/8112/36Coma, AR, OP, BP, QP4/32P, MB, OLmBA
    15/F/714/47Stupor, OP, BP, HP7/20P, CERlt.V3, rt.V3
    16/F/604/6Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP34/34PpBA
    • Note:—OTDT indicates onset-to-door time; OTPT, onset-to-the-procedure time; A-NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission; P-NIHSS, preprocedural National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; M (column 1), male; F, female; DWI, diffusion-weighted MR imaging performed immediately before the procedure; AR, ataxic respiration; OP, ophthalmoplegia; BP, bulbar palsy; QP, quadriparesis; HP, hemiparesis; M (column 5), medulla oblongata; P, pons; MB, midbrain; CER, cerebellum; OL, occipital lobe; lt., left-sided; rt., right-sided; V1, proximal extraosseous segment of the vertebral artery; V2, foraminal segment of the vertebral artery; V3, intra-extraspinal segment of the vertebral artery; V4, intradural segment of the VA; pBA, proximal basilar artery; mBA, middle basilar artery; dBA, distal basilar artery.

    • * This was diagnosed by angiography.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    OTDT/OTPT, preprocedural neurologic symptoms, and DWI/angiographic findings in the stenosis group

    Patient/Sex/Age (y)OTDT/OTPTPreprocedural Neurologic SymptomsA-NIHSS/P-NIHSSHigh Signal Intensity on DWIStenotic Vessels*Occluded Vessels*
    17/M/7724/27Somnolence, OP, BP, HP15/15CERlt.V4-pBA, rt.V4None
    18/M/652/96BP, frequent drop attacks2/1OLrt.V4-pBAlt.V4
    19/M/782/4Deep coma, AR, OP, BP, QP33/33CERdBArt.V2
    20/M/594/72Frequent drop attacks4/0Nonelt.V1, lt.V3, mBANone
    21/M/756/120OP, BP, frequent syncopal attacks2/2OLpBAlt.V3
    22/M/702/168OP, BP, frequent drop attacks6/2PLt.V4, rt.V4, mBANone
    23/F/8224/140BP, HP, frequent syncopal attacks3/3PmBArt.V3
    24/M/6448/168OP, frequent syncopal attacks2/1PpBANone
    25/M/6051/98Stupor, OP, BP, QP8/17MB, CERmBANone
    26/M/7410/96BP, frequent drop attacks1/1NonemBArt.V1
    27/M/7812/144Stupor, OP, BP, HP8/18CERlt. V1, mBArt.V1
    28/M/662/168OP, BP, HP10/7Prt.V4-pBAlt.V3
    • Note:—OTDT indicates onset-to-door time; OTPT, onset-to-the-procedure time; A-NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission; P-NIHSS, preprocedural National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; M (column 1), male; F, female; DWI, diffusion-weighted MR imaging performed immediately before the procedure; AR, ataxic respiration; OP, ophthalmoplegia; BP, bulbar palsy; QP, quadriparesis; HP, hemiparesis; P, pons; MB, midbrain; CER, cerebellum; OL, occipital lobe; lt., left-sided; rt., right-sided; V1, proximal extraosseous segment of the vertebral artery; V2, foraminal segment of the vertebral artery; V3, intraextraspinal segment of the vertebral artery; V4, intradural segment of the vertebral artery; pBA, proximal basilar artery; mBA, middle basilar artery; dBA, distal basilar artery.

    • * This was diagnosed by angiography.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Methods of TAS and angiographic results in the occlusion group

    Patient/Sex/Age (y)No. of Used StentsDose of Urokinase*Preprocedure/Postprocedure TIMI†Prestenosis/Poststenosis (%)‡Technical SuccessProcedural Dissections or Clots
    1/M/57300/3100/10SuccessYes
    2/M/72100/3100/5SuccessYes
    3/M/63300/3100/30SuccessYes
    4/M/750120/3100/40SuccessNo
    5/F/620240/0100/100FailureNE
    6/F/730420/0100/100FailureNE
    7/M/74000/3100/45SuccessNo
    8/M/770120/3100/20SuccessNo
    9/M/84100/3100/10SuccessYes
    10/F/74000/3100/40SuccessNo
    11/M/74100/0100/100FailureYes
    12/M/63000/3100/10SuccessNo
    13/F/76300/3100/8SuccessYes
    14/F/81000/3100/10SuccessNo
    15/F/71100/3100/25SuccessYes
    16/F/60000/3100/20SuccessNo
    • Note:—TAS indicates transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting; NE, no evaluation; M, male; F, female; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

    • * Data are ×104 units.

    • † Grading with the TIMI definitions, 0 indicates no perfusion; 1, penetration without perfusion; 2, partial perfusion; and 3, complete perfusion.

    • ‡ Preprocedural and postprocedural stenotic ratio was measured with the warfarin-aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease method.

    • View popup
    Table 4:

    Methods of TAS and angiographic results in the stenosis group

    Patient/Sex/Age (y)No. of Used StentsDose of Urokinase*Preprocedure/Postprocedure TIMI†Prestenosis/Poststenosis (%)‡Technical SuccessProcedural Dissections or Clots
    17/M/77302/395/10SuccessYes
    18/M/65002/390/22SuccessNo
    19/M/78102/382/0SuccessYes
    20/M/59001/394/30SuccessNo
    21/M/75102/390/12SuccessYes
    22/M/70002/380/20SuccessNo
    23/F/82002/290/90FailureNE
    24/M/64001/390/30SuccessNo
    25/M/60102/390/6SuccessYes
    26/M/74102/380/10SuccessYes
    27/M/78002/384/8SuccessNo
    28/M/66101/395/10SuccessYes
    • Note:—TAS, transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting; M, male; F, female; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; NE, no evaluation.

    • * Data are 104 units.

    • † Grading with the TIMI definitions, 0 indicates no perfusion; 1, penetration without perfusion; 2, partial perfusion; and 3, complete perfusion.

    • ‡ Preprocedural and postprocedural stenotic ratio was measured with the warfarin-aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease method.

    • View popup
    Table 5:

    Complications, subacute occlusion, and neurologic/clinical outcome in the occlusion group

    Patient/Sex/Age (y)Procedure-Related ComplicationsMajor ComplicationsSubacute Occlusion of the Treated VesselNIHSS Score at 7 Days after ProceduremRS Score at 90 Days after Procedure
    1/M/57NoneNoYes346
    2/M/72Distal embolismYesYes285
    3/M/63Distal embolismYesYes335
    4/M/75Hemorrhagic transformationNoNo103
    5/F/62Distal embolismYesNo206
    6/F/73NoneNoNo426
    7/M/74NoneNoNo31
    8/M/77NoneNoNo143
    9/M/84NoneNoYes146
    10/F/74NoneNoNo71
    11/M/74Vessel ruptureYesNo426
    12/M/63Intracranial hemorrhageYesNo426
    13/F/76Subarachnoid hemorrhageNoNo112
    14/F/81NoneNoNo173
    15/F/71Intracranial hemorrhageYesNo426
    16/F/60Distal embolismNoNo225
    • Note:—NIHSS indicates National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; M, male; F, female.

    • View popup
    Table 6:

    Complications, subacute occlusion, and neurologic/clinical outcome in the stenosis group

    Patient/Sex/Age (y)Procedure-Related ComplicationsMajor ComplicationsSubacute Occlusion of the Treated VesselNIHSS Score at 7 Days after ProceduremRS Score at 90 Days after Procedure
    17/M/77NoneNoYes316
    18/M/65NoneNoNo00
    19/M/78NoneNoNo426
    20/M/59NoneNoNo00
    21/M/75NoneNoNo00
    22/M/70NoneNoNo00
    23/F/82Nausea and vomitingNoNo21
    24/M/64NoneNoNo00
    25/M/60Headache and vomitingNoNo82
    26/M/74NoneNoNo00
    27/M/78NoneNoNo126
    28/M/66Headache and vomitingNoNo41
    • Note:—NIHSS indicates National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; M, male; F, female.

    • View popup
    Table 7:

    Comparison of baseline characteristics, procedure, and outcome between the groups

    VariableDataSubgroup (n = 28)P
    Occlusion Group (n = 16)Stenosis Group (n = 12)
    Age, median (range), y73.5 (57.0–84.0)73.5 (57.0–84.0)72 (59–82)NS*
    A-NIHSS, median (range), point8 (1–35)14.5 (3.0–35.0)5 (1–33)<.05*
    P-NIHSS, median (range), point18 (0–35)29.5 (12.0–35.0)2.5 (0.0–33.0)<.001*
    20 ≤P-NIHSS, n (%)14 (50)13 (81)1 (8).0001‡
    OTD time, median (range), h5.5 (1.0–51.0)5 (1-48)8 (2–51)NS*
    OTP time, median (range), h41.5 (3.0–168.0)9.5 (3.0–72.0)109 (4–168)<.01*
    Stenting, n (%)13 (46)7 (44)6 (50).74†
    LIF, n (%)4 (14)4 (25)0 (0).09‡
    Technical success, n (%)24 (86)13 (81)11 (92).42‡
    Major complication, n (%)6 (21)6 (38)0 (0).02‡
    Subacute occlusion, n (%)5 (18)4 (25)1 (8).27‡
    7-NIHSS ≤5 at 7 days, n (%)8 (29)1 (6)7 (58).004‡
    mRS ≤2 at 90 days, n (%)12 (43)3 (19)9 (75).004†
    Death within 90 days, n (%)10 (36)7 (44)3 (25).27‡
    • Note:—A-NIHSS indicates National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission; P-NIHSS, preprocedural National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score; OTD time, onset-to-door time; OTP time, onset-to-procedure time; LIF, localized intra-arterial fibrinolysis; 7-NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 7 days; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NS, not significant.

    • * Data are from Mann-Whitney U test.

    • † Data are from χ2 test for independence.

    • ‡ Data are from Fisher exact test.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 4
April 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Occlusive Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, T. Kunieda, N. Takabatake, S. Yamamoto, M. Watanabe
Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Occlusive Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2008, 29 (4) 773-780; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0906

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Occlusive Lesions in Acute Stroke Patients
K. Imai, T. Mori, H. Izumoto, T. Kunieda, N. Takabatake, S. Yamamoto, M. Watanabe
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2008, 29 (4) 773-780; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0906
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Stenting of complete vertebral artery ostial occlusion in a patient with medically refractory vertebrobasilar ischemia
  • Stenting of acute and subacute intracranial vertebrobasilar arterial occlusive lesions
  • Extracranial and Intracranial Sonographic Findings in Vertebral Artery Diseases
  • Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Guided vs Conventional Angiography Systems
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire