Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleBRAIN

Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-Value

S. Bisdas, D.E. Bohning, N. Bešenski, J.S. Nicholas and Z. Rumboldt
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2008, 29 (6) 1128-1133; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1044
S. Bisdas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.E. Bohning
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Bešenski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.S. Nicholas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. Rumboldt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Normal subject. FA map shows highly directional white matter tracts (corticospinal tracts) in the region of brain stem. The ROIs (50 mm2) for the estimation of the FA values are placed exclusively within the central portion of the visualized white matter tracts.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Descriptive statistics of FA values (×103) (SD), as well as results of the performed t test (P) in the examined anatomic structures on the basis of 2 b-values (mm2/s) and both scanning sessions.

    Anatomic Structureb-ValueSession 1Session 2
    Right internal capsule anterior limb1000691 (71)672 (54)
    700702 (63)718 (60)
    Right internal capsule genu1000702 (51)*737 (48)
        P = .02700745 (67)*760 (51)
    Right internal capsule posterior limb1000745 (33)732 (45)
    700761 (54)751 (37)
    Corpus callosum genu1000782 (71)816 (64)
    700769 (74)782 (70)
    Corpus callosum splenium1000823 (71)836 (69)
    700829 (53)851 (47)
    Left internal capsule anterior limb1000617 (81)*682 (65)
    Left internal capsule genu1000729 (53)746 (65)
    700741 (44)752 (57)
    Left internal capsule posterior limb1000766 (51)745 (55)
    700781 (53)767 (65)
    Right corticospinal tract1000646 (67)†570 (54)†
        P = .048700661 (54)631 (60)
    Left corticospinal tract1000672 (73)649 (61)
    700662 (91)672 (72)
    Right thalamus1000349 (36)†316 (24)†
        P = .024700358 (41)340 (39)
    • Note:—The values are based on the readings of the first rater.

    • * Statistically significant changes in the obtained FA between the 2 b-values are shown.

    • † Statistically significant changes in the obtained FA between the 2 scanning sessions are shown.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Intraclass correlation coefficients for interrater agreement between 2 observers for the examined FA values in various anatomic locations

    Anatomic Locationb-ValuesIntraclass Correlation Coefficients (95% Confidence Intervals), mm2/s
    Right internal capsule anterior limb10000.70 (0.49–0.85)
    7000.71 (0.61–0.92)
    Left internal capsule anterior limb10000.58 (0.31–0.72)
    7000.37 (0.20–0.56)
    Right internal capsule posterior limb10000.40 (0.28–0.60)
    7000.31 (0.10–0.52)
    Left internal capsule posterior limb10000.46 (0.20–0.67)
    7000.53 (0.33–0.87)
    Right internal capsule genu10000.58 (0.31–0.77)
    7000.39 (0.20–0.62)
    Left internal capsule genu10000.38 (0.17–0.49)
    7000.28 (0.13–0.47)
    Corpus callosum genu10000.73 (0.47–0.89)
    7000.60 (0.47–0.79)
    Corpus callosum splenium10000.82 (0.61–0.90)
    7000.88 (0.59–0.96)
    Right corticospinal tract10000.35 (0.18–0.58)
    7000.38 (0.16–0.53)
    Left corticospinal tract10000.34 (0.29–0.62)
    7000.47 (0.29–0.75)
    Right thalamus10000.64 (0.56–0.79)
    7000.65 (0.51–0.89)
    • Note:—The coefficients are calculated for 2 b-values.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Mean difference (SD) and 95% limits of agreement of the FA values (×103) for the ROI analysis between the 2 sessions, as well as measurement error and repeatability for the serial FA measurements in healthy subjects

    Anatomic Structureb-ValueMean Difference (SD)95% Limits of AgreementWithin-Subject SDWithin-Subject Coefficient of Variation, %Repeatability CoefficientSignificant Change for a Single Subject, %
    Right internal capsule anterior limb1000−18.4 (95.71)−206 to 169.2171.31319
    700−27 (88.03)−145 to 199.54061116
    Right internal capsule genu100074.7 (99.31)−119.9 to 269.4161.21116
    700−5.7 (130.17)−260.9 to 249.4263910
    Right internal capsule posterior limb100016.9 (35.48)−52.6 to 86.5130.677
    7009.5 (28.99)−47.3 to 66.314255
    Corpus callosum genu1000−22.2 (41.42)−103.4 to 59.0120.444
    70012.9 (49.71)−84.5 to 110.322367
    Corpus callosum splenium100010.6 (43.98)−103.4 to 59.020276
    700−22.7 (37.51)−92.9 to 50.921267
    Left internal capsule anterior limb1000−4.1 (59.45)−199.0 to 190.85161218
    700−20.7 (43.58)−106.2 to 64.04061317
    Left internal capsule genu1000−8.5 (66.63)−139.2 to 122.0334811
    700−3.4 (80.07)−160.4 to 153.54651115
    Left internal capsule posterior limb100023.0 (52.81)−80.5 to 126.5313719
    70028.3 (28.3)−41.0 to 97.522267
    Right corticospinal tract100074.7 (99.31)−119.9 to 269.46081624
    700−6.7 (130.17)−260.9 to 249.462101727
    Left corticospinal tract100054.9 (99.27)−139.7 to 249.55171520
    700−11.5 (131.9)−139.7 to 247.16391826
    Right thalamus100036.5 (29.32)−20.9 to 94.02261617
    70010.9 (56.26)−95.4 to 117.3268721
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 29 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 29, Issue 6
June 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-Value
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Bisdas, D.E. Bohning, N. Bešenski, J.S. Nicholas, Z. Rumboldt
Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-Value
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2008, 29 (6) 1128-1133; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1044

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-Value
S. Bisdas, D.E. Bohning, N. Bešenski, J.S. Nicholas, Z. Rumboldt
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2008, 29 (6) 1128-1133; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1044
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Early Prediction of Delayed Ischemia and Functional Outcome in Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Role of Diffusion Tensor Imaging
  • Toward Precision and Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Multicenter Diffusion Phantom and Traveling Volunteer Study
  • A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values
  • Multicentre imaging measurements for oncology and in the brain
  • Crossref (67)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners
    Christian Vollmar, Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh, Gareth J. Barker, Mark R. Symms, Pamela Thompson, Veena Kumari, John S. Duncan, Mark P. Richardson, Matthias J. Koepp
    NeuroImage 2010 51 4
  • A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values
    R.J. Fox, K. Sakaie, J.-C. Lee, J.P. Debbins, Y. Liu, D.L. Arnold, E.R. Melhem, C.H. Smith, M.D. Philips, M. Lowe, E. Fisher
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2012 33 4
  • A comprehensive reliability assessment of quantitative diffusion tensor tractography
    Jun Yi Wang, Hervé Abdi, Khamid Bakhadirov, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Michael D. Devous,
    NeuroImage 2012 60 2
  • MRI of healthy brain aging: A review
    M. Ethan MacDonald, G. Bruce Pike
    NMR in Biomedicine 2021 34 9
  • Brain aging in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): magnetic resonance imaging studies of macro- and microstructural changes
    Xu Chen, Bhargav Errangi, Longchuan Li, Matthew F. Glasser, Lars T. Westlye, Anders M. Fjell, Kristine B. Walhovd, Xiaoping Hu, James G. Herndon, Todd M. Preuss, James K. Rilling
    Neurobiology of Aging 2013 34 10
  • Toward Precision and Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Multicenter Diffusion Phantom and Traveling Volunteer Study
    E.M. Palacios, A.J. Martin, M.A. Boss, F. Ezekiel, Y.S. Chang, E.L. Yuh, M.J. Vassar, D.M. Schnyer, C.L. MacDonald, K.L. Crawford, A. Irimia, A.W. Toga, P. Mukherjee
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 3
  • Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects
    Jorge Jovicich, Moira Marizzoni, Beatriz Bosch, David Bartrés-Faz, Jennifer Arnold, Jens Benninghoff, Jens Wiltfang, Luca Roccatagliata, Agnese Picco, Flavio Nobili, Oliver Blin, Stephanie Bombois, Renaud Lopes, Régis Bordet, Valérie Chanoine, Jean-Philippe Ranjeva, Mira Didic, Hélène Gros-Dagnac, Pierre Payoux, Giada Zoccatelli, Franco Alessandrini, Alberto Beltramello, Núria Bargalló, Antonio Ferretti, Massimo Caulo, Marco Aiello, Monica Ragucci, Andrea Soricelli, Nicola Salvadori, Roberto Tarducci, Piero Floridi, Magda Tsolaki, Manos Constantinidis, Antonios Drevelegas, Paolo Maria Rossini, Camillo Marra, Josephin Otto, Martin Reiss-Zimmermann, Karl-Titus Hoffmann, Samantha Galluzzi, Giovanni B. Frisoni
    NeuroImage 2014 101
  • Enhanced ICBM diffusion tensor template of the human brain
    Shengwei Zhang, Huiling Peng, Robert J. Dawe, Konstantinos Arfanakis
    NeuroImage 2011 54 2
  • Impact of MR Acquisition Parameters on DTI Scalar Indexes: A Tractography Based Approach
    Gonzalo Barrio-Arranz, Rodrigo de Luis-García, Antonio Tristán-Vega, Marcos Martín-Fernández, Santiago Aja-Fernández, Huiguang He
    PLOS ONE 2015 10 10
  • Reproducibility, reliability and variability of FA and MD in the older healthy population: A test-retest multiparametric analysis
    Pedro A. Luque Laguna, Anna J.E. Combes, Johannes Streffer, Steven Einstein, Maarten Timmers, Steve C.R. Williams, Flavio Dell'Acqua
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2020 26

More in this TOC Section

  • Usefulness of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for the Diagnosis of Parkinson Disease
  • Evaluating the Effects of White Matter Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on the Volume Estimation of 6 Brain Tissue Segmentation Methods
  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire