Distinguishing Recurrent Intra-Axial Metastatic Tumor from Radiation Necrosis Following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Using Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging

References

1. ↵
   Mintz A, Perry J, Spithoff K, et al. Management of single brain metastasis: a practice guideline. Curr Oncol 2007;14:131–43

   CrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   Tsuruda JS, Kortman KE, Bradley WG, et al. Radiation effects on cerebral white matter: MR evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:165–71

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Dooms GC, Hecht S, Brant-Zawadzki M, et al. Brain radiation lesions: MR imaging. Radiology 1986;158:149–55

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Tomiguchi S, et al. Posttherapeutic intraaxial brain tumor: the value of perfusion-sensitive contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from nonneoplastic contrast-enhancing tissue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:901–09

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Cha S, Lupo JM, Chen MH, et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1078–84

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Lupo JM, Cha S, Chang SM, et al. Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1446–54

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. Essig M, Waschkies M, Wenz F, et al. Assessment of brain metastases with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial results. Radiology 2003;228:193–99

   PubMed
8. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1479–86

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. Lev MH, Ozsunar Y, Henson JW, et al. Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:214–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. Cha S, Lu S, Johnson G, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging: correlation of signal intensity changes with cerebral blood volume measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:114–19

    CrossRefPubMed
11. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41–51

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Law M, Cha S, Knopp EA, et al. High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases: differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging. Radiology 2002;222:715–21

    PubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Oh BC, Liu CY, Wang MY, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery: adjacent tissue injury and response after high-dose single fraction radiation. Part 1. Histology, imaging, and molecular events. Neurosurgery 2007;60:31–45

    PubMed
14. ↵
    Kamiryo T, Lopes MB, Kassell NF, et al. Radiosurgery-induced microvascular alterations precede necrosis of the brain neuropil. Neurosurgery 2001;49:409–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Long DM. Capillary ultrastructure in human metastatic brain tumors. J Neurosurg 1979;51:53–58

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. Remler MP, Marcussen WH, Tiller-Borsich J. The late effects of radiation on the blood brain barrier. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986;12:1965–69

    CrossRefPubMed
17. Jinnouchi T, Shibata S, Fukushima M, et al. Ultrastructure of capillary permeability in human brain tumor. Part 6. Metastatic brain tumor with brain edema [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1988;16 (5 suppl):563–68

    PubMed
18. ↵
    Spiegelmann R; Friedmann WA, Bova FJ, et al. LINAC radiosurgery: an animal model. J Neurosurg 1993;78:638–44

    PubMed
19. ↵
    Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, et al. Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth;1984
20. ↵
    The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org. Accessed February2008
21. ↵
    Chao S, Suh J, Raja S, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in distinguishing recurrent brain tumor from radionecrosis in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Cancer 2001;96:191–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. Ericson K, Kihlström L, Mogard J, et al. Positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with stereotactically irradiated brain metastases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1996;66 (suppl 1):214–24

    CrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    Petronas NJ, DiChiro G, Brooks RA, et al. Work in progress: [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in the evaluation of radiation necrosis of the brain. Radiology 1982;144:885–89

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Griffeth LK, Rich KM, Dehdashti F, et al. Brain metastases from non-central nervous system tumors: evaluation with PET. Radiology 1993;186:37–44

    PubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Kahn D, Follett KA, Bushnell DL, et al. Diagnosis of recurrent brain tumor: value of 201Tl SPECT vs 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1459–65

    CrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    Graves E, Nelson S, Vigneron D, et al. Serial proton MR spectroscopic imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas after gamma knife radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:613–24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    Schlemmer H, Bachert P, Herfarth K, et al. Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1316–24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. Hein P, Eskey C, Dunn J, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:201–09

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    Hollingworth W, Medina L, Lenkinski R, et al. A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1404–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    Lupo JM, Lee MC, Han ET, et al. Feasibility of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging at 3T using a standard quadrature head coil and eight-channel phased-array coil with and without SENSE reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:520–29

    CrossRefPubMed