Intra-Arterial Recanalization Techniques for Patients 80 Years or Older with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Pooled Analysis from 4 Prospective Studies

References

1. ↵
   Peterson ED, Batchelor WB. Percutaneous intervention in the very elderly: weighing the risks and benefits. Am Heart J 1999;137:585–87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Census UBot. Sixty-Five Plus in America, P23–178RV; Population Projections of the United States, by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin: 1993 to 2050. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office1992
3. ↵
   Census UBot. Life Tables of the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office;1986
4. ↵
   Chastain HD 2nd, Gomez CR, Iyer S, et al. Influence of age upon complications of carotid artery stenting. UAB Neurovascular Angioplasty Team. J Endovasc Surg 1999;6:217–22

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ, Roubin GS, et al. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:1106–11

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   van Oostenbrugge RJ, Hupperts RM, Lodder J. Thrombolysis for acute stroke with special emphasis on the very old: experience from a single Dutch centre [see comment]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:375–77

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Tanne D, Gorman MJ, Bates VE, et al. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke in patients aged 80 years and older: the tPA stroke survey experience. Stroke 2000;31:370–75

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Flaherty ML, Woo D, Kissela B, et al. Combined IV and intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005;64:386–88

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   Combined intravenous and intra-arterial recanalization for acute ischemic stroke: the Interventional Management of Stroke Study. Stroke 2004;35:904–11

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. ↵
    The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II Study. Stroke 2007;38:2127–35

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    Kim D, Ford GA, Kidwell CS, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute stroke in patients 80 and older: a comparison of results in patients younger than 80 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:159–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Qureshi AI, Janjua N, Kirmani JF, et al. Mechanical disruption of thrombus following intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2007;17:124–30

    PubMed
13. ↵
    Qureshi AI, Harris-Lane P, Kirmani JF, et al. Intra-arterial reteplase and intravenous abciximab in patients with acute ischemic stroke: an open-label, dose-ranging, phase I study. Neurosurgery 2006;59:789–96; discussion 96–97

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    Mahon BR, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL, et al. North American clinical experience with the EKOS MicroLysUS infusion catheter for the treatment of embolic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:534–38

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. ↵
    Qureshi AI, Siddiqui AM, Kim SH, et al. Reocclusion of recanalized arteries during intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:322–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    Qureshi AI. New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2002;50:1405–14; discussion 14–15

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med 1985;312:932–36

    PubMed
18. ↵
    Ahmed S, Antman EM, Murphy SA, et al. Poor outcomes after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of age (a meta-analysis of a decade of trials). J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006;21:119–29

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    DeGeare VS, Stone GW, Grines L, et al. Angiographic and clinical characteristics associated with increased in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous intervention (a pooled analysis of the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials). Am J Cardiol 2000;86:30–34

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    Prasad A, Stone GW, Aymong E, et al. Impact of ST-segment resolution after primary angioplasty on outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients: an analysis from the CADILLAC trial. Am Heart J 2004;147:669–75

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Tandberg Askevold E, Naess H, Thomassen L. Predictors for recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;16:21–24

    CrossRefPubMed
22. ↵
    Zangerle A, Kiechl S, Spiegel M, et al. Recanalization after thrombolysis in stroke patients: predictors and prognostic implications. Neurology 2007;68:39–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Tespili M, Guagliumi G, Valsecchi O, et al. In-hospital clinical outcome in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Italian Heart J 2003;4:193–98
24. ↵
    Katayama T, Kubo N, Takagi Y, et al. Relation of atherothrombosis burden and volume detected by intravascular ultrasound to angiographic no-reflow phenomenon during stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:301–04

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. ↵
    Urbach H, Hartmann A, Pohl C, et al. Local intra-arterial thrombolysis in the carotid territory: does recanalization depend on the thromboembolus type? Neuroradiology 2002;44:695–99

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Tummala RP, Qureshi AI. Is carotid artery stent placement a viable option for carotid artery stenosis in patients aged 80 years or greater?. J Neuroimaging 2008 Dec 5. [Epub ahead of print]
27. ↵
    Yamashita T, Sato A, Ikarugi H, et al. Significantly reduced spontaneous thrombolytic activity in older men: a possible explanation for the gender differences in risk of acute coronary syndromes. Thrombosis Res 2005;116:127–31

    PubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    Ikarugi H, Yamashita T, Aoki R, et al. Impaired spontaneous thrombolytic activity in elderly and in habitual smokers, as measured by a new global thrombosis test. Blood Coag Fibrinolysis 2003;14:781–84

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Yamamoto K, Takeshita K, Kojima T, et al. Aging and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) regulation: implication in the pathogenesis of thrombotic disorders in the elderly. Cardiovasc Res 2005;66:276–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    Wilkerson WR, Sane DC. Aging and thrombosis. Sem Thromb Hemostasis 2002;28:555–68

    CrossRef
31. ↵
    Calles-Escandon J, Ballor D, Harvey-Berino J, et al. Amelioration of the inhibition of fibrinolysis in elderly, obese subjects by moderate energy intake restriction. Am J Clin Nutrition 1996;64:7–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    Schuit AJ, Schouten EG, Kluft C, et al. Effect of strenuous exercise on fibrinogen and fibrinolysis in healthy elderly men and women. Thromb Haemostasis 1997;78:845–51

    PubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    Martina V, Benso A, Gigliardi VR, et al. Short-term dehydroepiandrosterone treatment increases platelet cGMP production in elderly male subjects. Clin Endocrinol 2006;64:260–64

    CrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    Sobesky J, Frackowiak M, Zaro Weber O, et al. The Cologne stroke experience: safety and outcome in 450 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Cerebrovascular Dis 2007;24:56–65

    CrossRefPubMed
35. ↵
    Mohammad Y, Xavier AR, Christoforidis G, et al. Qureshi grading scheme for angiographic occlusions strongly correlates with the initial severity and in-hospital outcome of acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2004;14:235–41

    CrossRefPubMed
36. ↵
    Kurotobi T, Sato H, Kinjo K, et al. Reduced collateral circulation to the infarct-related artery in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:28–34

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Burke SN, Barnes CA. Neural plasticity in the ageing brain. Nature Rev Neurosci 2006;7:30–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    Ward NS. Neural plasticity and recovery of function. Prog Brain Res 2005;150:527–35

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:723–30

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. ↵
    Yan BP, Gurvitch R, Duffy SJ, et al. An evaluation of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:928–36

    CrossRefPubMed
41. ↵
    Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, et al. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (<60, 60 to 80, and >80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1334–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    Mayo NE, Nadeau L, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. The evolution of stroke in Quebec: a 15-year perspective. Neurology 2007;68:1122–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. ↵
    Saposnik G, Cote R, Phillips S, et al. Stroke outcome in those over 80: a multicenter cohort study across Canada. Stroke 2008;39:2310–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. ↵
    Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Nasar A, et al. Thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in the United States: data from National Hospital Discharge Survey 1999–2001. Neurosurgery 2005;57:647–54; discussion 654

    PubMedWeb of Science