Temporal Bone Imaging: Comparison of Flat Panel Volume CT and Multisection CT

References

1. ↵
   Kalender WA. Der Einsatz von Flachbilddetektoren für die CT-Bildgebung [The use of flat panel detectors for CT imaging]. Radiologe 2003;43:379–87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007;17:2767–79

   CrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   Gupta R, Grasruck M, Suess C, et al. Ultra-high resolution flat panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1191–205

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Peltonen LI, Aarnisalo AA, Kortesniemi MK, et al. Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear: a comparison with multislice helical computed tomography. Acta Radiol 2007;48:207–12

   CrossRefPubMed
5. ↵
   Ross W, Cody DD, Hazle JD. Design and performance characteristics of a digital flat panel computed tomography system. Med Phys 2006;33:1888–901

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Webb S. Historical experiments predating commercially available computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1992;65:835–37

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial x-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:51–59

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. ↵
   Cohnen M, Kemper J, Mobes O, et al. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12:634–37

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, et al. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508–13

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558–64

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6 Suppl 1:31–36

    CrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    Dalchow CV, Weber AL, Bien S, et al. Value of digital volume tomography in patients with conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:92–99

    CrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    Dalchow CV, Weber AL, Yanagihara N, et al. Digital volume tomography: radiologic examinations of the temporal bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:416–23

    CrossRefPubMed
14. ↵
    Bartling SH, Gupta R, Torkos A, et al. Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:491–98

    CrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    Majdani O, Bartling SH, Leinung M, et al. A true minimally invasive approach for cochlear implantation: high accuracy in cranial base navigation through flat panel-based volume computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:120–23

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Nickoloff EL, Dutta AK, Lu ZF. Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index. Med Phys 2003;30:395–402

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    Rock C, Linsenmaier U, Brandl R, et al. Vorstellung eines neuen mobilen C-Bogen-/CT-Kombinationsgerät (ISO-C-3D). Erste Ergebnisse der 3D-Schnittbildgebung [Introduction of a new mobile C-arm/CT combination equipment (ISO-C-3D). Initial results of 3-D sectional imaging]. Unfallchirurg 2001;104:827–33

    CrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    Rock C, Kotsianos D, Linsenmaier U, et al. Untersuchungen zur Bildqualität, Hochkontrastauflösung und Dosis am Stamm- und Gliedmassenskelett mit einem neuen dedizierten CT-System (ISO-C-3D) [Studies on image quality, high contrast resolution and dose for the axial skeleton and limbs with a new, dedicated CT system (ISO-C-3 D)]. Rofo 2002;174:170–76

    CrossRefPubMed