Prediction of Functional Outcome in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 3T: A Prospective Study

References

1. ↵
   1. Sawlani V,
   2. Gupta RK,
   3. Singh MK,
   4. et al

   . MRI demonstration of wallerian degeneration in various intracranial lesions and its clinical implications. J Neurol Sci 1997; 146: 103– 08

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Cho SH,
   2. Kim SH,
   3. Choi BY,
   4. et al

   . Motor outcome according to diffusion tensor tractography findings in the early stage of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosci Lett 2007; 421: 142– 46

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Ward NS,
   2. Newton JM,
   3. Swayne OB,
   4. et al

   . Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain 2006; 129: 809– 19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   1. Inoue Y,
   2. Matsumura Y,
   3. Fukuda T,
   4. et al

   . MR imaging of wallerian degeneration in the brainstem: temporal relationships. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 897– 902

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   1. Binkofski F,
   2. Seitz RJ,
   3. Arnold S,
   4. et al

   . Thalamic metabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol 1996; 39: 460– 70

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Mukherjee P

   . Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in acute stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005; 15: 655– 65

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Buffon F,
   2. Molko N,
   3. Hervé D,
   4. et al

   . Longitudinal diffusion changes in cerebral hemispheres after MCA infarcts. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005; 25: 641– 50

   CrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Yang Q,
   2. Tress BM,
   3. Barber PA,
   4. et al

   . Serial study of apparent diffusion coefficient and anisotropy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 2382– 90

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Zelaya F,
   2. Flood N,
   3. Chalk JB,
   4. et al

   . An evaluation of the time dependence of the anisotropy of the water diffusion tensor in acute human ischemia. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 331– 48

   CrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Pierpaoli C,
    2. Barnett A,
    3. Pajevic S,
    4. et al

    . Water diffusion changes in wallerian degeneration and their dependence on white matter architecture. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 1174– 85

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Thomalla G,
    2. Glauche V,
    3. Koch MA,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging detects early wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract after ischemic stroke. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 1767– 74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Werring DJ,
    2. Toosy AT,
    3. Clark CA,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging can detect and quantify corticospinal tract degeneration after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 269– 72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Kuzu Y,
    2. Inoue T

    . Predictability of motor dysfunction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: fractional anisotropy value study. [Japanese] J Iwate Med Assoc 2005; 57: 267– 75
14. ↵
    1. Yoshida H,
    2. Horikoshi T,
    3. Aoki S,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor tractography predicts motor functional outcome in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2008; 62: 97– 103

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Yokoyama K,
    2. Matsuki M,
    3. Shimano H,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging in chronic subdural hematoma: correlation between clinical signs and fractional anisotropy in the pyramidal tract. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1159– 63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. van Swieten JC,
    2. Koudstaal PJ,
    3. Visser MC,
    4. et al

    . Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604– 07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Mahoney F,
    2. Barthel D

    . Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md Med J 1965; 1: 56– 61
18. ↵
    1. Brott T,
    2. Adams HP Jr.,
    3. Olinger CP,
    4. et al

    . Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864– 70

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Hemphill JC 3rd.,
    2. Bonovich DC,
    3. Besmertis L,
    4. et al

    . The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2001; 32: 891– 97

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Cheung RT,
    2. Zou LY

    . Use of the original, modified, or new intracerebral hemorrhage score to predict mortality and morbidity after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2003; 34: 1717– 22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Ganesan V,
    2. Ng V,
    3. Chong WK,
    4. et al

    . Lesion volume, lesion location, and outcome after middle cerebral artery territory stroke. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81: 295– 300

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Kuhn MJ,
    2. Mikulis DJ,
    3. Ayoub DM,
    4. et al

    . Wallerian degeneration after cerebral infarction: evaluation with sequential MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 172: 179– 82

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Delsing BJP,
    2. Catsman-Berrevoets CE,
    3. Appel IM

    . Early prognostic indicators of outcome in ischemic childhood stroke. Pediatr Neurol 2001; 24: 283– 89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Hsieh CT,
    2. Chen CY,
    3. Chiang YH,
    4. et al

    . Role of diffusion tensor imaging in a patient with spontaneous intracerebral hematoma treated by stereotactic evacuation. Surg Neurol 2008; 70: 75– 78

    CrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    1. de Haan R,
    2. Limburg M,
    3. Bossuyt P,
    4. et al

    . The clinical meaning of Rankin “handicap” grades after stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 2027– 30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Uyttenboogaart M,
    2. Luijckx GJ,
    3. Vroomen PC,
    4. et al

    . Measuring disability in stroke: relationship between the modified Rankin scale and the Barthel index. J Neurol 2007; 254: 1113– 37

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 1. Liang Z,
    2. Zeng J,
    3. Liu S,
    4. et al

    . A prospective study of secondary degeneration following subcortical infarction using diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78: 581– 86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Nieuwenhuys R,
    2. Voogd J,
    3. van Huijzen C

    . The Human Central Nervous System. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2008: 851– 56
29. ↵
    1. Aoki S,
    2. Iwata NK,
    3. Masutani Y,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative evaluation of the pyramidal tract segmented by diffusion tensor tractography: feasibility study in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Radiat Med 2005; 23: 195– 99

    PubMed
30. ↵
    1. Frank LR

    . Anisotropy in high angular resolution diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 935– 39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Tuch DS,
    2. Reese TG,
    3. Wiegell MR,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion MRI of complex neural architecture. Neuron 2003; 40: 885– 95

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Kabasawa,
    2. Alexander AL,
    3. Hasan KM,
    4. et al

    . Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 770– 80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Masutani Y,
    2. Aoki S,
    3. Abe O,
    4. et al

    . A new fiber tracking method based on vector field reconstruction excepting fiber crossing area in MR diffusion tensor images. [Japanese] Med Imag Tech 2004; 22: 243– 49
34. ↵
    1. Poonawalla AH,
    2. Zhou XJ

    . Analytical error propagation in diffusion anisotropy calculations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 489– 98

    CrossRefPubMed