Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Book ReviewBook Review

Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: Advanced Techniques and Controversies

J.J. Yue, R. Bertagnoli, P.C. McAfee and H.S. An
American Journal of Neuroradiology October 2009, 30 (9) E134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1707
J.J. Yue
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Bertagnoli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.C. McAfee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H.S. An
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Spinal fusion is the standard treatment for back pain that has failed conservative management. Although often effective, this surgery is not without adverse outcomes, including development of degenerative disk disease at an adjacent level, pseudoarthrosis, facet arthropathy, spondylolysis, and spondylolisthesis. The goal of motion preservation surgery is to closely replicate normal spinal biomechanics, the result of which should, in theory, be the limitation of complications associated with conventional fusion.

The rationale behind motion preservation is similar to that used in hip and knee arthroplasty. The functional spinal unit is more complicated, however; and the replication of normal spinal motion has been challenging. Each level is composed of not 1 but 3 separate joints: the intervertebral disk and the 2 facet joints. Not surprisingly, many different general approaches have been taken in the design of these devices, the result of which is a huge number of devices created with the goal of motion preservation. The number of these devices (I counted 47 listed in this book) and the variety of designs present the radiologist with the daunting task of identifying and classifying the types of devices.

In Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: Advanced Techniques and Controversies, Yue et al provide a thorough background, with an excellent description of the limitations of conventional fusion, and describe in great detail the goals of motion preservation. Most of the book, however, is devoted to descriptions of the individual motion-preservation devices. The book effectively categorizes these devices into 6 general groups on the basis of the spinal region being treated and the morphologic structure within the spine that is being replaced. These categories include the following: cervical total disk revision (TDR), lumbar TDR, nucleus replacement, pedicle screw− based posterior dynamic stabilization, interspinous spaced posterior dynamic stabilization, and lumbar facet replacement. The physical description of the devices, including the materials used in the construction and the biomechanical properties of the devices, is excellent and is supplemented with high-quality photographs, diagrams, and conventional x-rays of many of the devices. Many of the chapters also provide background information on the rationale for the individual devices, the stage of development, ideal patient selection, and the indications and contraindications for use.

Figure

In addition to a thorough background on motion preservation surgery and the devices used, there were several other features of this book that I found helpful. I found a chapter on the socioeconomic impact of these devices to be particularly interesting. As the author puts it, “There is big money in the spine,” and not surprisingly, a great deal of resources have been allocated to the advancement of this field. The chapter offers an objective evaluation of the major players (biotechnology companies, spine surgeons, and the government) in the motion preservation market and touches on the increasing role of surgeons in the design and development of these devices and the potential conflicts of interest that they may encounter. Chapters on spinal anatomy, complications of the anterior cervical approach, and a chapter on invasive diagnostic tools, such as facet blocks and diskography, are also very informative.

As a radiologist, I did find some minor limitations with this book. First, the target audience of this book is the surgeon, not the radiologist, and a significant portion of the book is devoted to the techniques of spinal surgery in general as well as more specific details of the implementation of individual devices. Second, in my opinion, there is relatively little information about the complications of these devices. This is, I suspect, in part due to the relatively short existence of many of these devices and the lack of significant long-term follow-up. A brief discussion of complications was given for the devices with longer term clinical follow-up, such as the Charite and Pro-Disc devices, but no images were provided. As we gain more experience with these devices, additional literature specifically discussing the radiologic complications will likely prove useful.

Due to the unique design of these devices, it is likely that many will present with a unique complement of complications. It is, therefore, imperative that the radiologist be able to differentiate between conventional fusion hardware and motion preservation devices. Although strict memorization of the imaging features of all devices would prove tedious and probably counterproductive, a review of this book will at least give the radiologist a basic understanding of the general device categories and the rationale for each. The individual devices are described in great detail, and once the device is correctly identified as motion-preserving, this book could serve as an excellent reference for further information regarding the specific device.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 30 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 30, Issue 9
1 Oct 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: Advanced Techniques and Controversies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2009, 30 (9) E134; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1707

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Motion Preservation Surgery of the Spine: Advanced Techniques and Controversies
American Journal of Neuroradiology Oct 2009, 30 (9) E134; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1707
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (7)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Two-year follow-up results of the Isobar TTL Semi-Rigid Rod System for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
    Zhonghai Li, Fengning Li, Shunzhi Yu, Hui Ma, Zhaohui Chen, Hailong Zhang, Qiang Fu
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2013 20 3
  • Viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement devices: Design concepts
    Celien A.M. Jacobs, Christoph J. Siepe, Keita Ito
    The Spine Journal 2020 20 12
  • Management Considerations for Total Intervertebral Disc Replacement
    Marco Foreman, Aashay Patel, Andrew Nguyen, Devon Foster, Adrienne Orriols, Brandon Lucke-Wold
    World Neurosurgery 2024 181
  • Surgical methods of treatment of back pain syndrome recurrence in the degenerative pathology of the lumbar spine
    P.G. Shnyakin, A.V. Botov, A.A. Amelchenko
    Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology 2018 12 3
  • Mechanical characterization of a novel biomimetic artificial disc for the cervical spine
    Celien A.M. Jacobs, S. Amir Kamali, Abdelrahman M. Abdelgawad, Björn P. Meij, Samaneh Ghazanfari, Marianna A. Tryfonidou, Stefan Jockenhoevel, Keita Ito
    Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2023 142
  • A Case-Based Approach to Neck Pain
    Caroline Varlotta
    2022
  • On the suitability of additively manufactured gyroid structures and their potential use as intervertebral disk replacement - a feasibility study
    Valentin Gross, Sergej Zankovic, Bernd Rolauffs, Dirk Velten, Hagen Schmal, Michael Seidenstuecker
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2024 12

More in this TOC Section

  • HIV and the Brain: New Challenges in the Modern Era (Current Clinical Neurology)
  • EXPERT ddx Brain and Spine
  • Ischemia and Loss of Vascular Autoregulation in Ocular and Cerebral Disease: A New Perspective
Show more Book Reviews

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire