Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula with Retrograde Cortical Venous Drainage: Use of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging in Combination with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Awad I,
   2. Little J,
   3. Akrawi W,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg 1990;72:839–50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Malik GM,
   2. Pearce JE,
   3. Ausman JI,
   4. et al

   . Dural arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1984;15:332–39

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Vinuela F,
   2. Fox AJ,
   3. Pelz DM,
   4. et al

   . Unusual clinical manifestations of dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:554–58

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Borden JA,
   2. Wu JK,
   3. Shucart WA

   . A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 1995;82:166–79

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Gobin Y,
   3. Pierot L,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 1995;194:671–80

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. van Dijk JM,
   2. terBrugge KG,
   3. Willinsky RA,
   4. et al

   . Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke 2002;33:1233–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Lasjaunias P,
   2. Chiu M,
   3. terBrugge K,
   4. et al

   . Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:724–30

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Hurst RW,
   2. Bagley LJ,
   3. Galetta S,
   4. et al

   . Dementia resulting from dural arteriovenous fistulas: the pathologic findings of venous hypertensive encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1267–73

   Abstract
9. 9.↵
   1. Willinsky R,
   2. Goyal M,
   3. terBrugge K,
   4. et al

   . Tortuous, enlarged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1031–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. DeMarco K,
    2. Dillon WP,
    3. Halbach VV,
    4. et al

    . Dural arteriovenous fistula: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1990;175:193–99

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen JC,
    2. Tsuruda JS,
    3. Halbach VV

    . Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR angiography in seven patients. Radiology 1992;183:265–71

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Willinsky R,
    2. terBrugge K,
    3. Montanera W,
    4. et al

    . Venous congestion: an MR finding in dural arteriovenous malformations with cortical venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1501–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Noguchi K,
    2. Melhem ER,
    3. Kanazawa T,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:183–90

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Coley SC,
    2. Romanowski CA,
    3. Hodgson TJ,
    4. et al

    . Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404–07

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Horie N,
    2. Morikawa M,
    3. Kitigawa N,
    4. et al

    . 2D thick-section MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:264–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Noguchi K,
    2. Kuwayama N,
    3. Kubo M,
    4. et al

    . Dural arteriovenous fistula involving the transverse sigmoid sinus after treatment: assessment with magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2007;49:639–43

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Farb RI,
    2. Agid R,
    3. Willinsky RA,
    4. et al

    . Cranial dural arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis and classification with time-resolved MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1546–51

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Nishimura S,
    2. Hirai T,
    3. Sasao A,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:80–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Noguchi K,
    2. Kubo M,
    3. Kuwayama N,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with retrograde cortical venous drainage: assessment with cerebral blood volume by dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1252–56

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Reichenbach JR,
    2. Venkatesan R,
    3. Schillinger DJ,
    4. et al

    . Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology 1997;204:272–77

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Reichenbach JR,
    2. Jonetz-Mentzel L,
    3. Fitzek C,
    4. et al

    . High-resolution blood oxygen-level dependent MR venography. Neuroradiology 2001;43:364–69

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Cheng YC,
    4. et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Barth M,
    2. Nobauer-Huhmann IM,
    3. Reichenbach JR,
    4. et al

    . High-resolution three-dimensional contrast-enhanced blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance venography of brain tumors at 3 Tesla: first clinical experience and comparison with 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2003;38:409–14

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Herigault G,
    3. Kido D,
    4. et al

    . Observing tumor vascularity noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging. Image Anal Stereol 2002;21:107–13
25. 25.↵
    1. Wycliffe ND,
    2. Choe J,
    3. Holshouser B,
    4. et al

    . Reliability in detection of hemorrhage in acute stroke by a new three-dimensional gradient recalled echo susceptibility-weighted imaging technique compared to computed tomography: a retrospective study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:372–77

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Tong KA,
    2. Ashwal S,
    3. Holshouser BA,
    4. et al

    . Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results. Radiology 2003;227:332–39

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Tong KA,
    2. Ashwal S,
    3. Holshouser BA,
    4. et al

    . Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Ann Neurol 2004;56:36–50

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Ogg RJ,
    2. Langston JW,
    3. Haacke EM,
    4. et al

    . The correlation between phase shifts in gradient-echo MR images and regional brain iron concentration. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:1141–48

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Lee BC,
    2. Vo KD,
    3. Kido DK,
    4. et al

    . MR high-resolution blood oxygenation level–dependent venography of occult (low-flow) vascular lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiology 1999;20:1239–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Haacke EM,
    2. Makki M,
    3. Ge Y,
    4. et al

    . Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:537–44

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Saini J,
    2. Thomas B,
    3. Bodhey NK,
    4. et al

    . Susceptibility-weighted imaging in cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:E6

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Thulborn KR,
    2. Waterton JC,
    3. Matthews PM,
    4. et al

    . Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982;714:265–70

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Li D,
    2. Waight DJ,
    3. Wang Y

    . In vivo correlation between blood T2* and oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1236–39

    PubMed