Posterior Glottic Stenosis with a Calcified Interarytenoid Scar Band: CT and Laryngoscopic Correlation

Discussion

PGS is usually due to soft-tissue adhesions in the interarytenoid region and/or the posterior commissure.^1–3 A calcified interarytenoid scar band is not typical. Although the calcified interarytenoid scar band can sometimes be visualized on direct laryngoscopy, it can be difficult to distinguish from the posterior plate of the cricoid, especially if there are contiguous soft-tissue adhesions spread between the arytenoids and posterior commissure. The neck CT was important for presurgical planning because it established that the calcified interarytenoid scar band was separate from the cricoid cartilage, an important structure to avoid during laser lysis, and assured the surgeon that definitive treatment could be safely pursued. Definitive treatment of PGS is lysis of the offending adhesions, whether soft tissue or calcified scar. Cutting of the cricoid cartilage is considered an iatrogenic injury, would not accomplish the desired goal of PGS treatment, and can result in subsequent airway complications.

In cases of PGS without a calcified interarytenoid scar band, CT imaging findings include narrowing or obliteration of the glottic airway, the presence of extra interarytenoid soft tissue, medialized vocal folds, and/or medialized arytenoid cartilage. It is important to report the lack of supraglottic, subglottic, or upper tracheal stenosis, which are pertinent negative imaging findings to exclude. CT imaging is also important to exclude paralaryngeal space or extralaryngeal abnormalities. Noncontrast CT imaging of the larynx may be accomplished with thin-section 2- to 3-mm collimation helical scanning technique with the gantry angled to parallel the laryngeal ventricles or the intervertebral endplates at the level of the larynx with the patient in quiet respiration. Some centers add a breath-hold scan to determine vocal fold mobility. Coronal and sagittal reformats are often helpful. If recurrent laryngeal nerve pathology is in question, a contrast-enhanced study is necessary to evaluate for a lesion along the course of these nerves.

The classification of PGS involves laryngoscopic palpation of the cricoarytenoid joints because it is based on the location of adhesions and the presence versus absence of cricoarytenoid joint fixation.¹ The classification scheme described by Bogdasarian and Olson¹ divides PGS into 4 categories: Type 1 is the presence of interarytenoid adhesions without extension to the posterior commissure, leaving a sinus tract or gap posteriorly. Type 2, the next in severity, is the presence of interarytenoid adhesions with extension to the posterior commissure. In these first 2 categories, the cricoarytenoid joints are not fixed. In the third and fourth types, there is unilateral and bilateral cricoarytenoid joint fixation, respectively. Our patient was classified as having type 2 PGS because the cricoarytenoid joints remained mobile and the scarring extended to the posterior commissure mucosal wall without a gap.

Two similar cases of PGS with calcified interarytenoid scar band were previously described,^4,5 though these were type 1 compared with our type 2 PGS. In the first case,⁴ preoperative CT showed bilateral cord fixation in the paramedian position and hyperossification of the vocal processes of the arytenoids. No calcified bridge was identified between the arytenoids on CT, but an interarytenoid “ossification” was found intraoperatively. Unlike our case, there was a submillimeter gap between the “ossification” and the intact mucosa of the posterior commissure, indicating that the “ossified” scar was distinct from the cricoid and allowing the surgeon to saw through the “ossification” for definitive treatment. In the second case,⁵ there was a 5-mm gap between the calcified interarytenoid scar band and the posterior commissure shown by both CT and laryngoscopy.

PGS may result from a variety of causes, including traumatic or prolonged intubation, external laryngeal trauma, postsurgery, radiation therapy, neoplastic involvement, infection, or inflammatory disorders.^1–5 Our patient's PGS with interarytenoid calcification was likely a delayed complication of intubation and inhalational injury.

PGS is a well-described entity in the otolaryngologic literature^1–3,5,6 but not well-emphasized in the radiologic literature. Although PGS itself may have nonspecific imaging findings, the presence of an associated calcified interarytenoid scar band is a specific but atypical finding. Identifying a calcified interarytenoid scar band separate from the cricoid cartilage is important for presurgical planning, and this band can be definitively treated. Radiologists need to understand and recognize this important variant of posterior glottic stenosis during the imaging evaluation of laryngotracheal stenosis.