Radiation Dose to the Lens Using Different Temporal Bone CT Scanning Protocols

References

1. 1.↵
   1. McCollough C,
   2. Cody D,
   3. Edyvean S,
   4. et al

   . The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. No. 96. Technical report. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 2008. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/. Accessed March 20, 2009
2. 2.↵
   ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) of the extracranial head and neck in adults and children, revised 2006 (Res. 12,17,35). Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/nuc_med/fdg_pet_ct.aspx. Accessed November 25, 2008
3. 3.↵
   1. Tweed JJ,
   2. Davies ML,
   3. Faulkner K,
   4. et al

   . Patient dose and associated risk due to radiological investigation of the internal auditory meatus. Br J Radiol 1991;64:447–51

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Siddle KJ,
   2. Sim LH,
   3. Case CC

   . Radiation doses to the lens of the eye during computerised tomography of the orbit: a comparison of four modern computerised tomography units. Australas Radiol 1990;34:323–25

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Geleijns J,
   2. Van Unnik JG,
   3. Zoetelief J,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computer tomography. Br J Radiol 1994;67:360–65

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Poletti JL

   . Patient doses from CT in New Zealand and a simple method for estimating effective dose. Br J Radiol 1996;69:432–36

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Maclennan AC,
   2. Hadley DM

   . Radiation dose to the lens from computed tomography scanning in a neuroradiology department. Br J Radiol 1995;68:19–22

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Nishizawa K,
   2. Maruyama T,
   3. Takayama M,
   4. et al

   . Determinations of organ doses and effective dose equivalents from computed tomographic examination. Br J Radiol 1991;64:20–28

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Torizuka T,
   2. Hayakawa K,
   3. Satoh Y,
   4. et al

   . High-resolution CT of the temporal bone: a modified baseline. Radiology 1992;184:109–11

   PubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Funama Y,
    2. Awai K,
    3. Shimamura M,
    4. et al

    . Reduction of radiation dose at HRCT of the temporal bone in children. Radiat Med 2005;23:578–83

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Lee CP,
    2. Black ML,
    3. Lamb RB,
    4. et al

    . CT evaluation of the temporal bone ossicles by using oblique reformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:431–33

    FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Husstedt HW,
    2. Prokop M,
    3. Dietrich B,
    4. et al

    . Low-dose high-resolution CT of the petrous bone. J Neuroradiol 2001;27:87–92

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    1. Siebert E,
    2. Klingebiel R

    . Pediatric low-dose CT: skull base. Visions 2008;12:62–65
14. 14.↵
    1. Klingebiel R,
    2. Bauknecht HC,
    3. Kaschke O,
    4. et al

    . High-resolution petrous bone imaging using multi-slice computerized tomography. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:632–36

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Vazquez E,
    2. Castellote A,
    3. Piqueras J,
    4. et al

    . Imaging of complications of acute mastoiditis in children. Radiographics 2003;23:359–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Hopper KD,
    2. Neuman JD,
    3. King SH,
    4. et al

    . Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1194–98

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Caldemeyer KS,
    2. Sandrasegaran K,
    3. Shinaver CN,
    4. et al

    . Temporal bone: comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1675–82

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Lutz J,
    2. Jäger V,
    3. Hempel MJ,
    4. et al

    . Delineation of temporal bone anatomy: feasibility of low-dose 64-row CT in regard to image quality. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2638–45. Epub 2007 Mar 7

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103: Recommendations of the ICRP: Annals of the ICRP. Vol 21. Oxford, UK: Perga